From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com>
Cc: shuah@kernel.org, john.johansen@canonical.com, jmorris@namei.org,
serge@hallyn.com, keescook@chromium.org, alan.maguire@oracle.com,
yzaikin@google.com, davidgow@google.com, tytso@mit.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Salvatore <mike.salvatore@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-kselftest/test v1] apparmor: add AppArmor KUnit tests for policy unpack
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:29:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191018122949.GD11244@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191018001816.94460-1-brendanhiggins@google.com>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 05:18:16PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> From: Mike Salvatore <mike.salvatore@canonical.com>
>
> In order to write the tests against the policy unpacking code, some
> static functions needed to be exposed for testing purposes. One of the
> goals of this patch is to establish a pattern for which testing these
> kinds of functions should be done in the future.
And you'd run into the same situation expressed elsewhere with kunit of
an issue of the kunit test as built-in working but if built as a module
then it would not work, given the lack of exports. Symbols namespaces
should resolve this [0], and we'd be careful where a driver imports this
namespace.
[0] https://lwn.net/Articles/798254/
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-18 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-18 0:18 [PATCH linux-kselftest/test v1] apparmor: add AppArmor KUnit tests for policy unpack Brendan Higgins
2019-10-18 0:33 ` Iurii Zaikin
2019-10-30 18:59 ` Kees Cook
2019-11-06 0:35 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-11-06 0:37 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-10-18 0:43 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-10-18 16:25 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-18 21:41 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-10-30 19:02 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-31 9:01 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-10-18 12:29 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2019-10-19 12:56 ` Alan Maguire
2019-10-19 18:36 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-10-24 0:42 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-10-24 10:15 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-10-30 19:09 ` Kees Cook
2019-10-30 20:11 ` Iurii Zaikin
2019-10-31 1:40 ` John Johansen
2019-10-31 9:33 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-10-31 18:40 ` Kees Cook
2019-11-05 16:43 ` Mike Salvatore
2019-11-05 23:59 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-10-31 1:37 ` John Johansen
2019-10-31 9:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2019-11-01 12:30 ` Alan Maguire
2019-11-05 23:44 ` Brendan Higgins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191018122949.GD11244@42.do-not-panic.com \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maennich@google.com \
--cc=mike.salvatore@canonical.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yzaikin@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.