All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	darrick.wong@oracle.com, fdmanana@kernel.org, nborisov@suse.com,
	dsterba@suse.cz, jthumshirn@suse.de,
	Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] btrfs: Remove btrfs_dio_data
Date: Thu,  5 Dec 2019 09:56:29 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191205155630.28817-8-rgoldwyn@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191205155630.28817-1-rgoldwyn@suse.de>

From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>

Since, we are using iomap, we don't get multiple calls for get_blocks(),
and there is no incomplete ordered extents. So, remove btrfs_dio_data
and all its manipulations. The bonus is we don't abuse
current->journal_info anymore.

This reverts f28a49287817 ("Btrfs: fix leaking of ordered extents after
direct IO write error")

Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 76 +++-----------------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index f619b5f6a095..fedbbcf108cf 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -56,13 +56,6 @@ struct btrfs_iget_args {
 	struct btrfs_root *root;
 };
 
-struct btrfs_dio_data {
-	u64 reserve;
-	u64 unsubmitted_oe_range_start;
-	u64 unsubmitted_oe_range_end;
-	int overwrite;
-};
-
 static const struct inode_operations btrfs_dir_inode_operations;
 static const struct inode_operations btrfs_symlink_inode_operations;
 static const struct inode_operations btrfs_dir_ro_inode_operations;
@@ -7622,7 +7615,6 @@ static struct extent_map *create_io_em(struct inode *inode, u64 start, u64 len,
 
 static int btrfs_get_blocks_direct_write(struct extent_map **map,
 					 struct inode *inode,
-					 struct btrfs_dio_data *dio_data,
 					 u64 start, u64 len)
 {
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
@@ -7696,13 +7688,9 @@ static int btrfs_get_blocks_direct_write(struct extent_map **map,
 	 * Need to update the i_size under the extent lock so buffered
 	 * readers will get the updated i_size when we unlock.
 	 */
-	if (!dio_data->overwrite && start + len > i_size_read(inode))
+	if (start + len > i_size_read(inode))
 		i_size_write(inode, start + len);
 
-	WARN_ON(dio_data->reserve < len);
-	dio_data->reserve -= len;
-	dio_data->unsubmitted_oe_range_end = start + len;
-	current->journal_info = dio_data;
 out:
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -7714,7 +7702,6 @@ static int btrfs_dio_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t start,
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
 	struct extent_map *em;
 	struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL;
-	struct btrfs_dio_data *dio_data = NULL;
 	u64 lockstart, lockend;
 	bool write = !!(flags & IOMAP_WRITE);
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -7738,16 +7725,6 @@ static int btrfs_dio_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t start,
 		ret = filemap_fdatawrite_range(inode->i_mapping, start,
 					 start + length - 1);
 
-	if (current->journal_info) {
-		/*
-		 * Need to pull our outstanding extents and set journal_info to NULL so
-		 * that anything that needs to check if there's a transaction doesn't get
-		 * confused.
-		 */
-		dio_data = current->journal_info;
-		current->journal_info = NULL;
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * If this errors out it's because we couldn't invalidate pagecache for
 	 * this range and we need to fallback to buffered.
@@ -7788,7 +7765,7 @@ static int btrfs_dio_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t start,
 	len = min(len, em->len - (start - em->start));
 	if (write) {
 		ret = btrfs_get_blocks_direct_write(&em, inode,
-						    dio_data, start, len);
+						    start, len);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			goto unlock_err;
 		unlock_extents = true;
@@ -7840,8 +7817,6 @@ static int btrfs_dio_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t start,
 	unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lockstart, lockend,
 			     &cached_state);
 err:
-	if (dio_data)
-		current->journal_info = dio_data;
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -8531,21 +8506,6 @@ static blk_qc_t btrfs_submit_direct(struct bio *dio_bio, struct file *file,
 		dip->subio_endio = btrfs_subio_endio_read;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Reset the range for unsubmitted ordered extents (to a 0 length range)
-	 * even if we fail to submit a bio, because in such case we do the
-	 * corresponding error handling below and it must not be done a second
-	 * time by btrfs_direct_IO().
-	 */
-	if (write) {
-		struct btrfs_dio_data *dio_data = current->journal_info;
-
-		dio_data->unsubmitted_oe_range_end = dip->logical_offset +
-			dip->bytes;
-		dio_data->unsubmitted_oe_range_start =
-			dio_data->unsubmitted_oe_range_end;
-	}
-
 	ret = btrfs_submit_direct_hook(dip);
 	if (!ret)
 		return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
@@ -8648,7 +8608,6 @@ ssize_t btrfs_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 	struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
 	struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
-	struct btrfs_dio_data dio_data = { 0 };
 	struct extent_changeset *data_reserved = NULL;
 	loff_t offset = iocb->ki_pos;
 	size_t count = 0;
@@ -8666,7 +8625,6 @@ ssize_t btrfs_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 		 * not unlock the i_mutex at this case.
 		 */
 		if (offset + count <= inode->i_size) {
-			dio_data.overwrite = 1;
 			inode_unlock(inode);
 			relock = true;
 		} else if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) {
@@ -8678,16 +8636,6 @@ ssize_t btrfs_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 		if (ret)
 			goto out;
 
-		/*
-		 * We need to know how many extents we reserved so that we can
-		 * do the accounting properly if we go over the number we
-		 * originally calculated.  Abuse current->journal_info for this.
-		 */
-		dio_data.reserve = round_up(count,
-					    fs_info->sectorsize);
-		dio_data.unsubmitted_oe_range_start = (u64)offset;
-		dio_data.unsubmitted_oe_range_end = (u64)offset;
-		current->journal_info = &dio_data;
 		down_read(&BTRFS_I(inode)->dio_sem);
 	}
 
@@ -8696,25 +8644,7 @@ ssize_t btrfs_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 
 	if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE) {
 		up_read(&BTRFS_I(inode)->dio_sem);
-		current->journal_info = NULL;
-		if (ret < 0 && ret != -EIOCBQUEUED) {
-			if (dio_data.reserve)
-				btrfs_delalloc_release_space(inode, data_reserved,
-					offset, dio_data.reserve, true);
-			/*
-			 * On error we might have left some ordered extents
-			 * without submitting corresponding bios for them, so
-			 * cleanup them up to avoid other tasks getting them
-			 * and waiting for them to complete forever.
-			 */
-			if (dio_data.unsubmitted_oe_range_start <
-			    dio_data.unsubmitted_oe_range_end)
-				__endio_write_update_ordered(inode,
-					dio_data.unsubmitted_oe_range_start,
-					dio_data.unsubmitted_oe_range_end -
-					dio_data.unsubmitted_oe_range_start,
-					false);
-		} else if (ret >= 0 && (size_t)ret < count)
+		if (ret >= 0 && (size_t)ret < count)
 			btrfs_delalloc_release_space(inode, data_reserved,
 					offset, count - (size_t)ret, true);
 		btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), count);
-- 
2.16.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-05 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-05 15:56 [PATCH 0/8 v3] btrfs direct-io using iomap Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-05 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/8] fs: Export generic_file_buffered_read() Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-05 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/8] iomap: add a filesystem hook for direct I/O bio submission Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-05 15:56 ` [PATCH 3/8] iomap: Remove lockdep_assert_held() Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-05 15:56 ` [PATCH 4/8] btrfs: Switch to iomap_dio_rw() for dio Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-05 17:18   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-05 17:19     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-05 17:32       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-05 17:33         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-05 17:36           ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-05 17:37             ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-05 17:37               ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-05 17:40                 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-05 17:44         ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-05 22:59   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-07 11:57   ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-05 15:56 ` [PATCH 5/8] fs: Remove dio_end_io() Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-05 15:56 ` [PATCH 6/8] btrfs: Wait for extent bits to release page Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-05 15:56 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues [this message]
2019-12-05 15:56 ` [PATCH 8/8] btrfs: remove BTRFS_INODE_READDIO_NEED_LOCK Goldwyn Rodrigues
2019-12-05 22:57   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-12-06 15:09 ` [PATCH 0/8 v3] btrfs direct-io using iomap David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191205155630.28817-8-rgoldwyn@suse.de \
    --to=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.