All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] btrfs: make btrfs_ordered_extent naming consistent with btrfs_file_extent_item
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:32:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210183257.GB204474@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210182252.GF3929@twin.jikos.cz>

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 07:22:52PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 05:34:19PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> > 
> > ordered->start, ordered->len, and ordered->disk_len correspond to
> > fi->disk_bytenr, fi->num_bytes, and fi->disk_num_bytes, respectively.
> > It's confusing to translate between the two naming schemes. Since a
> > btrfs_ordered_extent is basically a pending btrfs_file_extent_item,
> > let's make the former use the naming from the latter.
> > 
> > Note that I didn't touch the names in tracepoints just in case there are
> > scripts depending on the current naming.
> 
> Ok, though we've changed tracepoint strings as needed, it's sort of ABI
> but also not. In this case the change would affect 4 tracepoints.

What would you prefer in this case?

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-10 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-03  1:34 [PATCH 0/9] btrfs: miscellaneous cleanups Omar Sandoval
2019-12-03  1:34 ` [PATCH 1/9] btrfs: get rid of trivial __btrfs_lookup_bio_sums() wrappers Omar Sandoval
2019-12-03  8:36   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-10 17:12   ` David Sterba
2019-12-10 18:24     ` Omar Sandoval
2019-12-10 18:26       ` David Sterba
2019-12-10 18:37         ` [PATCH] btrfs: get rid of at_offset parameter to btrfs_lookup_bio_sums() Omar Sandoval
2019-12-03  1:34 ` [PATCH 2/9] btrfs: remove dead snapshot-aware defrag code Omar Sandoval
2019-12-03  8:38   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-10 17:22   ` David Sterba
2019-12-03  1:34 ` [PATCH 3/9] btrfs: make btrfs_ordered_extent naming consistent with btrfs_file_extent_item Omar Sandoval
2019-12-03  9:51   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-10 18:22   ` David Sterba
2019-12-10 18:32     ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2019-12-10 18:48       ` David Sterba
2019-12-03  1:34 ` [PATCH 4/9] btrfs: remove unnecessary pg_offset assignments in __extent_writepage() Omar Sandoval
2019-12-03 12:59   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-03  1:34 ` [PATCH 5/9] btrfs: remove trivial goto label " Omar Sandoval
2019-12-03 13:06   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-03  1:34 ` [PATCH 6/9] btrfs: remove redundant i_size check in __extent_writepage_io() Omar Sandoval
2019-12-10 17:45   ` David Sterba
2019-12-03  1:34 ` [PATCH 7/9] btrfs: drop create parameter to btrfs_get_extent() Omar Sandoval
2019-12-03  7:47   ` Omar Sandoval
2019-12-03  1:34 ` [PATCH 8/9] btrfs: simplify compressed/inline check in __extent_writepage_io() Omar Sandoval
2019-12-03 13:17   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-03  1:34 ` [PATCH 9/9] btrfs: remove struct find_free_extent.ram_bytes Omar Sandoval
2019-12-03 13:27   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-03 18:01     ` Omar Sandoval
2019-12-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 0/9] btrfs: miscellaneous cleanups David Sterba
2019-12-10 18:50   ` Omar Sandoval

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191210183257.GB204474@vader \
    --to=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.