Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 00/10] Use ODP MRs for kernel ULPs

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
To: "santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com" <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	Hans Westgaard Ry <hans.westgaard.ry@oracle.com>,
	Moni Shoua <monis@mellanox.com>,
	linux-netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 00/10] Use ODP MRs for kernel ULPs
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:12:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200117141232.GX20978@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ef540ae-233f-50cd-d096-3eeae31410cc@oracle.com>

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:34:18AM -0800, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com wrote:
> On 1/16/20 5:57 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 06:59:29AM +0000, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > >   45 files changed, 559 insertions(+), 256 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Thanks Santosh for your review.
> > > 
> > > David,
> > > Is it ok to route those patches through RDMA tree given the fact that
> > > we are touching a lot of files in drivers/infiniband/* ?
> > > 
> > > There is no conflict between netdev and RDMA versions of RDS, but to be
> > > on safe side, I'll put all this code to mlx5-next tree.
> > 
> > Er, lets not contaminate the mlx5-next with this..
> > 
> > It looks like it applies clean to -rc6 so if it has to be in both
> > trees a clean PR against -rc5/6 is the way to do it.
> > 
> > Santos, do you anticipate more RDS patches this cycle?
> > 
> 
> Not for upcoming merge window afaik.

In this case DaveM, will you ack and we can take it through RDMA?

The RDMA pieces look OK to me, like Santos I have reviewed many
versions of this already..

Thanks,
Jason