All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jan Hoeppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] dasd: use blk_drop_partitions instead of badly reimplementing it
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:28:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200414072902.324936-7-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414072902.324936-1-hch@lst.de>

Use the blk_drop_partitions function instead of messing around with
ioctls that get kernel pointers.  For this blk_drop_partitions needs
to be exported, which it normally shouldn't - make an exception for
s390 only.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 block/partitions/core.c         |  4 ++++
 drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c | 20 ++++----------------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/partitions/core.c b/block/partitions/core.c
index deccc3fbcd37..8c5295ca8ea6 100644
--- a/block/partitions/core.c
+++ b/block/partitions/core.c
@@ -624,6 +624,10 @@ int blk_drop_partitions(struct block_device *bdev)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+#ifdef CONFIG_S390
+/* for historic reasons in the DASD driver */
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_drop_partitions);
+#endif
 
 static bool blk_add_partition(struct gendisk *disk, struct block_device *bdev,
 		struct parsed_partitions *state, int p)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
index 7d079154f849..af5b0ecb8f89 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
@@ -143,9 +143,6 @@ int dasd_scan_partitions(struct dasd_block *block)
  */
 void dasd_destroy_partitions(struct dasd_block *block)
 {
-	/* The two structs have 168/176 byte on 31/64 bit. */
-	struct blkpg_partition bpart;
-	struct blkpg_ioctl_arg barg;
 	struct block_device *bdev;
 
 	/*
@@ -155,19 +152,10 @@ void dasd_destroy_partitions(struct dasd_block *block)
 	bdev = block->bdev;
 	block->bdev = NULL;
 
-	/*
-	 * See fs/partition/check.c:delete_partition
-	 * Can't call delete_partitions directly. Use ioctl.
-	 * The ioctl also does locking and invalidation.
-	 */
-	memset(&bpart, 0, sizeof(struct blkpg_partition));
-	memset(&barg, 0, sizeof(struct blkpg_ioctl_arg));
-	barg.data = (void __force __user *) &bpart;
-	barg.op = BLKPG_DEL_PARTITION;
-	for (bpart.pno = block->gdp->minors - 1; bpart.pno > 0; bpart.pno--)
-		ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKPG, (unsigned long) &barg);
-
-	invalidate_partition(block->gdp, 0);
+	mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+	blk_drop_partitions(bdev);
+	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+
 	/* Matching blkdev_put to the blkdev_get in dasd_scan_partitions. */
 	blkdev_put(bdev, FMODE_READ);
 	set_capacity(block->gdp, 0);
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-14  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-14  7:28 more partition handling cleanups v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  7:28 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: refactor blkpg_ioctl Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  8:09   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-14  7:28 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: pass a hd_struct to delete_partition Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  7:28 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: cleanup hd_struct freeing Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  7:28 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: remove hd_struct_kill Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  7:28 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: remove the disk argument from blk_drop_partitions Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  7:28 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-04-14  7:28 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: don't call invalidate_partition " Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  8:12   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-14  7:29 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: simplify block device syncing in bdev_del_partition Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  7:29 ` [PATCH 09/10] block: mark invalidate_partition static Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  7:29 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: fold bdev_unhash_inode into invalidate_partition Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-20 17:26 ` more partition handling cleanups v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-20 17:35 ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-04-08 19:44 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-08 19:44 ` [PATCH 06/10] dasd: use blk_drop_partitions instead of badly reimplementing it Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200414072902.324936-7-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hoeppner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sth@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.