All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: remove cc-option test of -fno-stack-protector
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:01:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701060150.GA1181113@elver.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200626185913.92890-1-masahiroy@kernel.org>

On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 03:59AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Some Makefiles already pass -fno-stack-protector unconditionally.
> For example, arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile, arch/x86/xen/Makefile.
> No problem report so far about hard-coding this option. So, we can
> assume all supported compilers know -fno-stack-protector.
> 
> GCC 4.8 and Clang support this option (https://godbolt.org/z/_HDGzN)
> 
> Get rid of cc-option from -fno-stack-protector.
> 
> Remove CONFIG_CC_HAS_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE, which should always be 'y'.
> 
> Note:
> arch/mips/vdso/Makefile adds -fno-stack-protector twice, first
> unconditionally, and second conditionally. I removed the second one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
> ---
> 
>  Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst | 4 ++--
>  Makefile                                  | 2 +-
>  arch/Kconfig                              | 3 ---
>  arch/arm/boot/compressed/Makefile         | 3 +--
>  arch/mips/vdso/Makefile                   | 3 +--
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile              | 2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/Makefile  | 2 +-
>  arch/sparc/vdso/Makefile                  | 4 ++--
>  arch/um/Makefile                          | 3 +--
>  arch/x86/Makefile                         | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile         | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile              | 4 ++--
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile              | 3 +--
>  arch/x86/lib/Makefile                     | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/Makefile                      | 7 +++----
>  arch/x86/power/Makefile                   | 3 +--
>  arch/x86/purgatory/Makefile               | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/um/vdso/Makefile                 | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/xen/Makefile                     | 5 ++---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile     | 2 +-
>  drivers/xen/Makefile                      | 3 +--
>  kernel/kcsan/Makefile                     | 3 +--

Is it possible that this patch drops the KCSAN portion? We have a patch
that is part of a series intended for 5.9 that also removes the
cc-option from -fno-stack-protector, but can't easily be dropped from
the surrounding series.

Please see: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200624190236.GA6603@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72

Thanks,
-- Marco

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-01  6:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-26 18:59 [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: remove cc-option test of -fno-stack-protector Masahiro Yamada
2020-06-26 18:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] kbuild: remove cc-option test of -ffreestanding Masahiro Yamada
2020-06-26 19:58   ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-26 20:22   ` Kees Cook
2020-06-27  7:39   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-06-26 19:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: remove cc-option test of -fno-stack-protector Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-26 20:00   ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-06-26 20:13   ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 20:13 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-26 20:21   ` Kees Cook
2020-06-26 20:25     ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-26 20:37       ` Kees Cook
2020-06-27 11:58   ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-06-29 18:26     ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-29 22:39       ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-30 18:18         ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-07-01 19:33         ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-06-26 20:18 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-27  7:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-07-01  6:01 ` Marco Elver [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200701060150.GA1181113@elver.google.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.