All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] xfs: xfs_iflock is no longer a completion
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:41:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200822074116.GA8859@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200812092556.2567285-2-david@fromorbit.com>

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 07:25:44PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> With the recent rework of the inode cluster flushing, we no longer
> ever wait on the the inode flush "lock". It was never a lock in the
> first place, just a completion to allow callers to wait for inode IO
> to complete. We now never wait for flush completion as all inode
> flushing is non-blocking. Hence we can get rid of all the iflock
> infrastructure and instead just set and check a state flag.
> 
> Rename the XFS_IFLOCK flag to XFS_IFLUSHING, convert all the
> xfs_iflock_nowait() test-and-set operations on that flag, and
> replace all the xfs_ifunlock() calls to clear operations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c     | 17 ++++------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c      | 73 +++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h      | 33 +------------------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c | 15 ++++-----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.h |  4 +--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c      | 11 ++++---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c      | 10 +++---
>  7 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> index 101028ebb571..aa6aad258670 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ xfs_inode_alloc(
>  
>  	XFS_STATS_INC(mp, vn_active);
>  	ASSERT(atomic_read(&ip->i_pincount) == 0);
> -	ASSERT(!xfs_isiflocked(ip));
>  	ASSERT(ip->i_ino == 0);
>  
>  	/* initialise the xfs inode */
> @@ -123,7 +122,7 @@ void
>  xfs_inode_free(
>  	struct xfs_inode	*ip)
>  {
> -	ASSERT(!xfs_isiflocked(ip));
> +	ASSERT(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IFLUSHING));
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Because we use RCU freeing we need to ensure the inode always
> @@ -1035,23 +1034,21 @@ xfs_reclaim_inode(
>  
>  	if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL))
>  		goto out;
> -	if (!xfs_iflock_nowait(ip))
> +	if (xfs_iflags_test_and_set(ip, XFS_IFLUSHING))
>  		goto out_iunlock;
>  
>  	if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount)) {
>  		xfs_iunpin_wait(ip);
> -		/* xfs_iflush_abort() drops the flush lock */

Maybe keeps this as

		/*  xfs_iflush_abort() clears XFS_IFLUSHING */

> @@ -3661,7 +3643,6 @@ xfs_iflush_cluster(
>  		 */
>  		if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp)) {
>  			xfs_iunpin_wait(ip);
> -			/* xfs_iflush_abort() drops the flush lock */

Same here.

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-22  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-12  9:25 [PATCH 00/13] xfs: in memory inode unlink log items Dave Chinner
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: xfs_iflock is no longer a completion Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 23:44   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-22  7:41   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: add log item precommit operation Dave Chinner
2020-08-22  9:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: factor the xfs_iunlink functions Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 23:49   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-22  7:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: arrange all unlinked inodes into one list Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 23:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19  0:45     ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:58     ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-22  9:01       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-23 17:24         ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-24  8:19           ` [RFC PATCH] xfs: use log_incompat feature instead of speculate matching Gao Xiang
2020-08-24  8:34             ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-24 15:08               ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-24 15:41                 ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-25 10:06                   ` [PATCH] " Gao Xiang
2020-08-25 14:54                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-25 15:30                       ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-27  7:19                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: add unlink list pointers to xfs_inode Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:02   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19  0:47     ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-22  9:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-25  5:17     ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-27  7:21       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: replace iunlink backref lookups with list lookups Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:13   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19  0:52     ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: mapping unlinked inodes is now redundant Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:14   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: updating i_next_unlinked doesn't need to return old value Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: validate the unlinked list pointer on update Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:23   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: re-order AGI updates in unlink list updates Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:29   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19  1:01     ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: combine iunlink inode update functions Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:30   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: add in-memory iunlink log item Dave Chinner
2020-08-19  0:35   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-12  9:25 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: reorder iunlink remove operation in xfs_ifree Dave Chinner
2020-08-12 11:12   ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-19  0:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-18 18:17 ` [PATCH 00/13] xfs: in memory inode unlink log items Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-18 20:01   ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-18 21:42   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200822074116.GA8859@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.