From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@fb.com>,
<daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: <andrii@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 13/14] selftests/bpf: add tp_btf CO-RE reloc test for modules
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 12:46:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201203204634.1325171-14-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201203204634.1325171-1-andrii@kernel.org>
Add another CO-RE relocation test for kernel module relocations. This time for
tp_btf with direct memory reads.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c | 3 +-
.../bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_module.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c
index bb980848cd77..06eb956ff7bb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c
@@ -514,7 +514,8 @@ static struct core_reloc_test_case test_cases[] = {
},
/* validate we can find kernel module BTF types for relocs/attach */
- MODULES_CASE("module", "raw_tp/bpf_testmod_test_read", "bpf_testmod_test_read"),
+ MODULES_CASE("module_probed", "raw_tp/bpf_testmod_test_read", "bpf_testmod_test_read"),
+ MODULES_CASE("module_direct", "tp_btf/bpf_testmod_test_read", NULL),
/* validate BPF program can use multiple flavors to match against
* single target BTF type
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_module.c
index d1840c1a9d36..56363959f7b0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_module.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_module.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ struct core_reloc_module_output {
};
SEC("raw_tp/bpf_testmod_test_read")
-int BPF_PROG(test_core_module,
+int BPF_PROG(test_core_module_probed,
struct task_struct *task,
struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx *read_ctx)
{
@@ -64,3 +64,33 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_core_module,
return 0;
}
+
+SEC("tp_btf/bpf_testmod_test_read")
+int BPF_PROG(test_core_module_direct,
+ struct task_struct *task,
+ struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx *read_ctx)
+{
+ struct core_reloc_module_output *out = (void *)&data.out;
+ __u64 pid_tgid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid();
+ __u32 real_tgid = (__u32)(pid_tgid >> 32);
+ __u32 real_pid = (__u32)pid_tgid;
+
+ if (data.my_pid_tgid != pid_tgid)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (task->pid != real_pid || task->tgid != real_tgid)
+ return 0;
+
+ out->len = read_ctx->len;
+ out->off = read_ctx->off;
+
+ out->read_ctx_sz = bpf_core_type_size(struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx);
+ out->read_ctx_exists = bpf_core_type_exists(struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx);
+ out->buf_exists = bpf_core_field_exists(read_ctx->buf);
+ out->off_exists = bpf_core_field_exists(read_ctx->off);
+ out->len_exists = bpf_core_field_exists(read_ctx->len);
+
+ out->comm_len = BPF_CORE_READ_STR_INTO(&out->comm, task, comm);
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.24.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-03 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-03 20:46 [PATCH v6 bpf-next 00/14] Support BTF-powered BPF tracing programs for kernel modules Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-03 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 01/14] bpf: fix bpf_put_raw_tracepoint()'s use of __module_address() Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-03 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 02/14] bpf: keep module's btf_data_size intact after load Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-03 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 03/14] libbpf: add internal helper to load BTF data by FD Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-03 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 04/14] libbpf: refactor CO-RE relocs to not assume a single BTF object Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-03 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 05/14] libbpf: add kernel module BTF support for CO-RE relocations Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-03 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 06/14] selftests/bpf: add bpf_testmod kernel module for testing Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-03 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 07/14] selftests/bpf: add support for marking sub-tests as skipped Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-03 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 08/14] selftests/bpf: add CO-RE relocs selftest relying on kernel module BTF Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-03 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 09/14] bpf: remove hard-coded btf_vmlinux assumption from BPF verifier Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-03 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 10/14] bpf: allow to specify kernel module BTFs when attaching BPF programs Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-04 1:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-12-04 19:31 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-03 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 11/14] libbpf: factor out low-level BPF program loading helper Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-03 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 12/14] libbpf: support attachment of BPF tracing programs to kernel modules Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-03 20:46 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2020-12-03 20:46 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 14/14] selftests/bpf: add fentry/fexit/fmod_ret selftest for kernel module Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201203204634.1325171-14-andrii@kernel.org \
--to=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.