All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	elver@google.com, paulmck@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	james.morse@arm.com, dvyukov@google.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 05/11] arm64: entry: prepare ret_to_user for function call
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 18:38:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201217183810.GD20278@gaia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201217175740.GA90220@roeck-us.net>

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 09:57:40AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:59:44AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > In a subsequent patch ret_to_user will need to make a C function call
> > (in some configurations) which may clobber x0-x18 at the start of the
> > finish_ret_to_user block, before enable_step_tsk consumes the flags
> > loaded into x1.
> > 
> > In preparation for this, let's load the flags into x19, which is
> > preserved across C function calls. This avoids a redundant reload of the
> > flags and ensures we operate on a consistent shapshot regardless.
> > 
> > There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. At this
> > point of the entry/exit paths we only need to preserve x28 (tsk) and the
> > sp, and x19 is free for this use.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> 
> This patch results in:
> 
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:774: Error: immediate out of range at operand 3 -- `and x2,x19,#((1<<1)|(1<<0)|(1<<2)|(1<<3)|(1<<4)|(1<<5)|(1<<7))'
> 
> This is with gcc 9.3.0 and binutils 2.34. Do I need a special compiler
> and/or binutils version to make it compile ?

It has been fixed in Linus' tree last night. It's a limitation of the
instruction rather than toolchain.

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-17 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-30 11:59 [PATCHv2 00/11] arm64: entry lockdep/rcu/tracing fixes Mark Rutland
2020-11-30 11:59 ` [PATCHv2 01/11] arm64: syscall: exit userspace before unmasking exceptions Mark Rutland
2020-11-30 11:59 ` [PATCHv2 02/11] arm64: mark idle code as noinstr Mark Rutland
2020-11-30 11:59 ` [PATCHv2 03/11] arm64: entry: mark entry " Mark Rutland
2020-11-30 11:59 ` [PATCHv2 04/11] arm64: entry: move enter_from_user_mode to entry-common.c Mark Rutland
2020-11-30 11:59 ` [PATCHv2 05/11] arm64: entry: prepare ret_to_user for function call Mark Rutland
2020-12-17 17:57   ` Guenter Roeck
2020-12-17 18:38     ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2020-11-30 11:59 ` [PATCHv2 06/11] arm64: entry: move el1 irq/nmi logic to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-06  8:28   ` He Ying
2021-05-06  9:16     ` Mark Rutland
     [not found]       ` <e3843e03-173e-10a6-5b14-0d8c14219e09@huawei.com>
2021-05-06 10:58         ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-07  3:25           ` He Ying
2021-05-07  9:41             ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-07 10:02               ` He Ying
2020-11-30 11:59 ` [PATCHv2 07/11] arm64: entry: fix non-NMI user<->kernel transitions Mark Rutland
2020-11-30 11:59 ` [PATCHv2 08/11] arm64: ptrace: prepare for EL1 irq/rcu tracking Mark Rutland
2020-11-30 11:59 ` [PATCHv2 09/11] arm64: entry: fix non-NMI kernel<->kernel transitions Mark Rutland
2021-04-25  5:29   ` Zenghui Yu
2021-04-26  9:21     ` Mark Rutland
2021-04-26 13:39       ` Zenghui Yu
2021-04-27  7:15         ` Zenghui Yu
2021-04-27 14:43           ` Mark Rutland
2020-11-30 11:59 ` [PATCHv2 10/11] arm64: entry: fix NMI {user, kernel}->kernel transitions Mark Rutland
2020-11-30 11:59 ` [PATCHv2 11/11] arm64: entry: fix EL1 debug transitions Mark Rutland
2020-11-30 13:52 ` [PATCHv2 00/11] arm64: entry lockdep/rcu/tracing fixes Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201217183810.GD20278@gaia \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.