All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: sandeen@sandeen.net, darrick.wong@oracle.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs_db: add inobtcnt upgrade path
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 12:40:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210115204022.GB3134581@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210114094057.GC1333929@bfoster>

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:40:57AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 05:08:35PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 01:35:05PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 10:28:25PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > > > 
> > > > Enable users to upgrade their filesystems to support inode btree block
> > > > counters.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > 
> > > These two look Ok to me, but I noticed that both commands have weird
> > > error semantics when run through xfs_admin and the associated features
> > > are already set. E.g.:
> > > 
> > > # xfs_admin -O inobtcount /dev/test/tmp 
> > > Upgrading V5 filesystem
> > > Upgraded V5 filesystem.  Please run xfs_repair.
> > > versionnum [0xb4a5+0x18a] = V5,NLINK,DIRV2,ALIGN,LOGV2,EXTFLG,MOREBITS,ATTR2,LAZYSBCOUNT,PROJID32BIT,CRC,FTYPE,FINOBT,SPARSE_INODES,REFLINK,INOBTCNT
> > > Running xfs_repair to ensure filesystem consistency.
> > > # xfs_admin -O inobtcount /dev/test/tmp 
> > > inode btree counter feature is already enabled
> > > Running xfs_repair to ensure filesystem consistency.
> > > Conversion failed, is the filesystem unmounted?
> > > # mount /dev/test/tmp /mnt/
> > > # umount /mnt/
> > > 
> > > So it looks like we run repair again the second time around even though
> > > the bit was already set, which is probably unnecessary, but then also
> > > for some reason report the result as failed.
> > 
> > Hm.  I guess I could define a second exitcode that means "no action
> > taken", and have xfs_admin exit.
> > 
> 
> It's not totally clear to me what the expected flow is supposed to be if
> a particular feature upgrade fails or is otherwise interrupted partway
> through.

Me neither.  But let me try to work through some outcomes:

Upgrade succeeds -- xfs_db returns 0, needsrepair is set, repair runs
Cannot upgrade -- xfs_db returns 2, fs untouched
Feature already set -- xfs_db returns 2, fs untouched
FS corrupt -- xfs_db returns 1, fs untouched, repair runs
primary super write fails -- xfs_db returns 1, fs untouched, repair runs
secondary sb write fails -- xfs_db returns 1, primary super has
			    needsrepair set, repair runs

Does that seem thorough enough?  That's, uh, what the code in my dev
tree does now.  Will send out a v++ in a bit.

> If the expectation is for the user to rerun the xfs_admin
> command, it might be worth making sure that we somehow or another fall
> back through to repair when appropriate (whether it be unconditionally,
> by checking if NEEDSREPAIR is still set, etc.)..

My expectation is that if xfs_db fails, the admin should run xfs_repair
to fix anything that's wrong with the fs.  Maybe they can skip that if
the primary super write fails with EIO, but that's up to the sysadmin's
judgment.

--D

> Brian
> 
> > > (I also realized that repair is fixing up some agi metadata in this
> > > case, so my previous thought around a special repair verify mode is
> > > probably not relevant..).
> > 
> > <nod>
> > 
> > --D
> > 
> > > Brian
> > > 
> > > >  db/sb.c              |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  man/man8/xfs_admin.8 |    7 +++++++
> > > >  man/man8/xfs_db.8    |    3 +++
> > > >  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/db/sb.c b/db/sb.c
> > > > index 93e4c405..b89ccdbe 100644
> > > > --- a/db/sb.c
> > > > +++ b/db/sb.c
> > > > @@ -597,6 +597,7 @@ version_help(void)
> > > >  " 'version attr2'    - enable v2 inline extended attributes\n"
> > > >  " 'version log2'     - enable v2 log format\n"
> > > >  " 'version needsrepair' - flag filesystem as requiring repair\n"
> > > > +" 'version inobtcount' - enable inode btree counters\n"
> > > >  "\n"
> > > >  "The version function prints currently enabled features for a filesystem\n"
> > > >  "according to the version field of its primary superblock.\n"
> > > > @@ -857,6 +858,27 @@ version_f(
> > > >  			}
> > > >  
> > > >  			v5features.incompat |= XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_NEEDSREPAIR;
> > > > +		} else if (!strcasecmp(argv[1], "inobtcount")) {
> > > > +			if (xfs_sb_version_hasinobtcounts(&mp->m_sb)) {
> > > > +				dbprintf(
> > > > +		_("inode btree counter feature is already enabled\n"));
> > > > +				exitcode = 1;
> > > > +				return 1;
> > > > +			}
> > > > +			if (!xfs_sb_version_hasfinobt(&mp->m_sb)) {
> > > > +				dbprintf(
> > > > +		_("inode btree counter feature cannot be enabled on filesystems lacking free inode btrees\n"));
> > > > +				exitcode = 1;
> > > > +				return 1;
> > > > +			}
> > > > +			if (!xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb)) {
> > > > +				dbprintf(
> > > > +		_("inode btree counter feature cannot be enabled on pre-V5 filesystems\n"));
> > > > +				exitcode = 1;
> > > > +				return 1;
> > > > +			}
> > > > +
> > > > +			v5features.ro_compat |= XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_INOBTCNT;
> > > >  		} else if (!strcasecmp(argv[1], "extflg")) {
> > > >  			switch (XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(&mp->m_sb)) {
> > > >  			case XFS_SB_VERSION_1:
> > > > diff --git a/man/man8/xfs_admin.8 b/man/man8/xfs_admin.8
> > > > index b423981d..a776b375 100644
> > > > --- a/man/man8/xfs_admin.8
> > > > +++ b/man/man8/xfs_admin.8
> > > > @@ -116,6 +116,13 @@ If this is a V5 filesystem, flag the filesystem as needing repairs.
> > > >  Until
> > > >  .BR xfs_repair (8)
> > > >  is run, the filesystem will not be mountable.
> > > > +.TP
> > > > +.B inobtcount
> > > > +Upgrade a V5 filesystem to support the inode btree counters feature.
> > > > +This reduces mount time by caching the size of the inode btrees in the
> > > > +allocation group metadata.
> > > > +Once enabled, the filesystem will not be writable by older kernels.
> > > > +The filesystem cannot be downgraded after this feature is enabled.
> > > >  .RE
> > > >  .TP
> > > >  .BI \-U " uuid"
> > > > diff --git a/man/man8/xfs_db.8 b/man/man8/xfs_db.8
> > > > index 7331cf19..1b826e5d 100644
> > > > --- a/man/man8/xfs_db.8
> > > > +++ b/man/man8/xfs_db.8
> > > > @@ -976,6 +976,9 @@ The filesystem can be flagged as requiring a run through
> > > >  if the
> > > >  .B needsrepair
> > > >  option is specified and the filesystem is formatted with the V5 format.
> > > > +Support for the inode btree counters feature can be enabled by using the
> > > > +.B inobtcount
> > > > +option if the filesystem is formatted with the V5 format.
> > > >  .IP
> > > >  If no argument is given, the current version and feature bits are printed.
> > > >  With one argument, this command will write the updated version number
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-15 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-09  6:28 [PATCHSET v2 0/2] xfs_admin: support upgrading v5 filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-09  6:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs_db: add inobtcnt upgrade path Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-13 18:35   ` Brian Foster
2021-01-14  1:08     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-14  9:40       ` Brian Foster
2021-01-15 20:40         ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-01-09  6:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs_db: add bigtime " Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-16  1:24 [PATCHSET v3 0/2] xfs_admin: support upgrading v5 filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-16  1:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs_db: add inobtcnt upgrade path Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-03 19:43 [PATCHSET v4 0/2] xfs_admin: support upgrading v5 filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2021-02-03 19:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs_db: add inobtcnt upgrade path Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210115204022.GB3134581@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.