[RFC PATCH v6 03/22] af_vsock: separate receive data loop

From: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>,
	Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@gmx.net>,
	Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@amazon.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<stsp2@yandex.ru>, <oxffffaa@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 03/22] af_vsock: separate receive data loop
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 20:59:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210307175923.3464735-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210307175722.3464068-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>

Move STREAM specific data receive logic to '__vsock_stream_recvmsg()'
dedicated function, while checks, that will be same for both STREAM
and SEQPACKET sockets, stays in 'vsock_connectible_recvmsg()' shared
functions.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 421c0303b26f..0bc661e54262 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1895,65 +1895,22 @@ static int vsock_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct wait_queue_entry *wait,
 	return data;
 }
 
-static int
-vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
-			  int flags)
+static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
+				  size_t len, int flags)
 {
-	struct sock *sk;
-	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
+	struct vsock_transport_recv_notify_data recv_data;
 	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
-	int err;
-	size_t target;
+	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
 	ssize_t copied;
+	size_t target;
 	long timeout;
-	struct vsock_transport_recv_notify_data recv_data;
+	int err;
 
 	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
 
-	sk = sock->sk;
 	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
-	err = 0;
-
-	lock_sock(sk);
-
 	transport = vsk->transport;
 
-	if (!transport || sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
-		/* Recvmsg is supposed to return 0 if a peer performs an
-		 * orderly shutdown. Differentiate between that case and when a
-		 * peer has not connected or a local shutdown occured with the
-		 * SOCK_DONE flag.
-		 */
-		if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE))
-			err = 0;
-		else
-			err = -ENOTCONN;
-
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	if (flags & MSG_OOB) {
-		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	/* We don't check peer_shutdown flag here since peer may actually shut
-	 * down, but there can be data in the queue that a local socket can
-	 * receive.
-	 */
-	if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) {
-		err = 0;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	/* It is valid on Linux to pass in a zero-length receive buffer.  This
-	 * is not an error.  We may as well bail out now.
-	 */
-	if (!len) {
-		err = 0;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
 	/* We must not copy less than target bytes into the user's buffer
 	 * before returning successfully, so we wait for the consume queue to
 	 * have that much data to consume before dequeueing.  Note that this
@@ -2012,6 +1969,67 @@ vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 	if (copied > 0)
 		err = copied;
 
+out:
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int
+vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
+			  int flags)
+{
+	struct sock *sk;
+	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
+	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
+	int err;
+
+	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+
+	sk = sock->sk;
+	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+	err = 0;
+
+	lock_sock(sk);
+
+	transport = vsk->transport;
+
+	if (!transport || sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
+		/* Recvmsg is supposed to return 0 if a peer performs an
+		 * orderly shutdown. Differentiate between that case and when a
+		 * peer has not connected or a local shutdown occurred with the
+		 * SOCK_DONE flag.
+		 */
+		if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE))
+			err = 0;
+		else
+			err = -ENOTCONN;
+
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (flags & MSG_OOB) {
+		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* We don't check peer_shutdown flag here since peer may actually shut
+	 * down, but there can be data in the queue that a local socket can
+	 * receive.
+	 */
+	if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) {
+		err = 0;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* It is valid on Linux to pass in a zero-length receive buffer.  This
+	 * is not an error.  We may as well bail out now.
+	 */
+	if (!len) {
+		err = 0;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	err = __vsock_stream_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags);
+
 out:
 	release_sock(sk);
 	return err;
-- 
2.25.1

