[PATCH v4 16/20] arm64: entry: split bad stack entry

From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, joey.gouly@arm.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 16/20] arm64: entry: split bad stack entry
Date: Mon,  7 Jun 2021 10:46:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210607094624.34689-17-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210607094624.34689-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>

We'd like to keep all the entry sequencing in entry-common.c, as this
will allow us to ensure this is consistent, and free from any unsound
instrumentation.

Currently handle_bad_stack() performs the NMI entry sequence in traps.c.
Let's split the low-level entry sequence from the reporting, moving the
former to entry-common.c and keeping the latter in traps.c. To make it
clear that reporting function never returns, it is renamed to
panic_bad_stack().

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/exception.h |  4 ++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c   | 11 +++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c          |  6 +-----
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/exception.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/exception.h
index ad30a5a1d2bf..0113b9242b67 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/exception.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/exception.h
@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ static inline u32 disr_to_esr(u64 disr)
 	return esr;
 }
 
+asmlinkage void handle_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs);
+
 asmlinkage void el1t_64_sync_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
 asmlinkage void el1t_64_irq_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
 asmlinkage void el1t_64_fiq_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
@@ -73,4 +75,6 @@ void do_el0_svc(struct pt_regs *regs);
 void do_el0_svc_compat(struct pt_regs *regs);
 void do_ptrauth_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr);
 void do_serror(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr);
+
+void panic_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr, unsigned long far);
 #endif	/* __ASM_EXCEPTION_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
index ce5c8af91d31..efe95edf10c0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
@@ -699,3 +699,14 @@ UNHANDLED(el0t, 32, irq)
 UNHANDLED(el0t, 32, fiq)
 UNHANDLED(el0t, 32, error)
 #endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
+asmlinkage void noinstr handle_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	unsigned int esr = read_sysreg(esr_el1);
+	unsigned long far = read_sysreg(far_el1);
+
+	arm64_enter_nmi(regs);
+	panic_bad_stack(regs, esr, far);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_VMAP_STACK */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index 47d423f7ac81..af941996eb5f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -763,15 +763,11 @@ void bad_el0_sync(struct pt_regs *regs, int reason, unsigned int esr)
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE/sizeof(long)], overflow_stack)
 	__aligned(16);
 
-asmlinkage void noinstr handle_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs)
+void panic_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr, unsigned long far)
 {
 	unsigned long tsk_stk = (unsigned long)current->stack;
 	unsigned long irq_stk = (unsigned long)this_cpu_read(irq_stack_ptr);
 	unsigned long ovf_stk = (unsigned long)this_cpu_ptr(overflow_stack);
-	unsigned int esr = read_sysreg(esr_el1);
-	unsigned long far = read_sysreg(far_el1);
-
-	arm64_enter_nmi(regs);
 
 	console_verbose();
 	pr_emerg("Insufficient stack space to handle exception!");
-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
