From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Folio tree for next
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 20:22:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210720202202.dfd4d9c3490e51e35cf1455e@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YPeKnIpd+EAU4SZP@casper.infradead.org>
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 03:46:52 +0100 Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> > Sure, let's go that way. Linus wasn't terribly enthusiastic about the
> > folio patches and I can't claim to be overwhelmed by their value/churn
> > ratio (but many MM developers are OK with it all, and that
> > counts). Doing it this way retains options...
>
> I'm happy to take these three patches through my tree if it makes life
> easier (and it does resolve the majority of the pain):
>
> mm, memcg: add mem_cgroup_disabled checks in vmpressure and swap-related functions
> mm, memcg: inline mem_cgroup_{charge/uncharge} to improve disabled memcg config
> mm, memcg: inline swap-related functions to improve disabled memcg config
They're rather unimportant, can be deferred.
I'll probably move these to the post-linux-next queue, but let's just
do it and see how it goes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-21 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-19 3:18 Folio tree for next Matthew Wilcox
2021-07-19 3:57 ` Andrew Morton
2021-07-19 23:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-19 23:51 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-20 2:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-07-21 2:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-21 2:29 ` Andrew Morton
2021-07-21 2:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-07-21 3:22 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2021-07-21 3:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-07-21 5:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210720202202.dfd4d9c3490e51e35cf1455e@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.