From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] selftests/bpf: Fix perf_buffer test on system with offline cpus
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 23:14:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211017211457.343768-1-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus:
# test_progs -t perf_buffer
test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec
test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec
test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec
test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec
test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec
test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec
skipping offline CPU #24
skipping offline CPU #25
skipping offline CPU #26
skipping offline CPU #27
skipping offline CPU #28
skipping offline CPU #29
skipping offline CPU #30
skipping offline CPU #31
test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec
test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec
test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32
Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
index 6979aff4aab2..877600392851 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
@@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ void serial_test_perf_buffer(void)
"expect %d, seen %d\n", nr_on_cpus, CPU_COUNT(&cpu_seen)))
goto out_free_pb;
- if (CHECK(perf_buffer__buffer_cnt(pb) != nr_cpus, "buf_cnt",
- "got %zu, expected %d\n", perf_buffer__buffer_cnt(pb), nr_cpus))
+ if (CHECK(perf_buffer__buffer_cnt(pb) != nr_on_cpus, "buf_cnt",
+ "got %zu, expected %d\n", perf_buffer__buffer_cnt(pb), nr_on_cpus))
goto out_close;
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
--
2.31.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-10-17 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-17 21:14 Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-10-17 21:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix possible/online index mismatch in perf_buffer test Jiri Olsa
2021-10-17 21:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Use nanosleep tracepoint in perf buffer test Jiri Olsa
2021-10-21 11:41 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] selftests/bpf: Fixes for perf_buffer test Jiri Olsa
2021-10-21 11:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] selftests/bpf: Fix perf_buffer test on system with offline cpus Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211017211457.343768-1-jolsa@kernel.org \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.