From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/6] selftests/bpf: Use __BYTE_ORDER__
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 03:08:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211026010831.748682-4-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211026010831.748682-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>
Use the compiler-defined __BYTE_ORDER__ instead of the libc-defined
__BYTE_ORDER for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_endian.c | 6 +++---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c | 4 ++--
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c | 14 +++++++-------
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c | 2 +-
.../bpf/verifier/perf_event_sample_period.c | 6 +++---
5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_endian.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_endian.c
index 2653cc482df4..8afbf3d0b89a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_endian.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_endian.c
@@ -7,12 +7,12 @@
#include <bpf/btf.h>
void test_btf_endian() {
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
enum btf_endianness endian = BTF_LITTLE_ENDIAN;
-#elif __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
+#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
enum btf_endianness endian = BTF_BIG_ENDIAN;
#else
-#error "Unrecognized __BYTE_ORDER"
+#error "Unrecognized __BYTE_ORDER__"
#endif
enum btf_endianness swap_endian = 1 - endian;
struct btf *btf = NULL, *swap_btf = NULL;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c
index a20a919244c0..a3bb6d399daa 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static struct sysctl_test tests[] = {
.descr = "ctx:write sysctl:write read ok narrow",
.insns = {
/* u64 w = (u16)write & 1; */
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct bpf_sysctl, write)),
#else
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static struct sysctl_test tests[] = {
.descr = "ctx:file_pos sysctl:read read ok narrow",
.insns = {
/* If (file_pos == X) */
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct bpf_sysctl, file_pos)),
#else
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c
index 9e1a30b94197..83cecfbd6739 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c
@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@
"check skb->hash byte load permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash)),
#else
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@
"check skb->hash byte load permitted 3",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 3),
#else
@@ -646,7 +646,7 @@
"check skb->hash half load permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash)),
#else
@@ -661,7 +661,7 @@
"check skb->hash half load permitted 2",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 2),
#else
@@ -676,7 +676,7 @@
"check skb->hash half load not permitted, unaligned 1",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 1),
#else
@@ -693,7 +693,7 @@
"check skb->hash half load not permitted, unaligned 3",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash) + 3),
#else
@@ -951,7 +951,7 @@
"check skb->data half load not permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
#else
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c
index 2cab6a3966bb..5c8944d0b091 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
"check skb->tc_classid half load not permitted for lwt prog",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid)),
#else
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/perf_event_sample_period.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/perf_event_sample_period.c
index 471c1a5950d8..d8a9b1a1f9a2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/perf_event_sample_period.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/perf_event_sample_period.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
"check bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period byte load permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data, sample_period)),
#else
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
"check bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period half load permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data, sample_period)),
#else
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
"check bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period word load permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data, sample_period)),
#else
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-26 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-26 1:08 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/6] core_reloc fixes for s390 Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-26 1:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/6] libbpf: Fix endianness detection in BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD_PROBED() Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-26 1:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/6] libbpf: Use __BYTE_ORDER__ Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-27 19:05 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-10-26 1:08 ` Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2021-10-26 1:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/6] samples: seccomp: use __BYTE_ORDER__ Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-26 1:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/6] selftests/seccomp: Use __BYTE_ORDER__ Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-26 1:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 6/6] selftests/bpf: Fix test_core_reloc_mods on big-endian machines Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-26 3:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/6] core_reloc fixes for s390 Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211026010831.748682-4-iii@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.