All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Martin Fuzzey <mfuzzey@parkeon.com>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iio: mma8452: Fix trigger reference couting
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 18:08:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211030180856.45345c1a@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86c1aa49-edc4-c02c-7ab7-4d075819a847@metafoo.de>

On Sat, 30 Oct 2021 17:12:02 +0200
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> wrote:

> On 10/30/21 5:03 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 21:52:46 +0200
> > Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> wrote:
> >  
> >> On 10/28/21 4:07 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:  
> >>> On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 11:26:59 +0200
> >>> Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> wrote:
> >>>     
> >>>> The mma8452 driver directly assigns a trigger to the struct iio_dev. The
> >>>> IIO core when done using this trigger will call `iio_trigger_put()` to drop
> >>>> the reference count by 1.
> >>>>
> >>>> Without the matching `iio_trigger_get()` in the driver the reference count
> >>>> can reach 0 too early, the trigger gets freed while still in use and a
> >>>> use-after-free occurs.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fix this by getting a reference to the trigger before assigning it to the
> >>>> IIO device.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: ae6d9ce05691 ("iio: mma8452: Add support for interrupt driven triggers.")
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>  
> >>> Gah. I thought we'd gotten all these years ago. I guess this one slipped through
> >>> the net.  
> >> Btw. we already have iio_trigger_set_immutable(), which handles the
> >> reference counting. I was think of adding a iio(_device)_trigger_set()
> >> that does the same except not setting the trig_readonly flag. And then
> >> eventually move the trigger to iio_dev_opaque. Any concerns with this?  
> > No concerns, seems like as sensible change given how things are evolving.
> > Obviously some other stuff that would need changing before we can
> > actually move trig.
> >
> > One early step would be to modify iio_trigger_notify_done() to take
> > a struct iio_dev rather than a struct iio_trigger.  A job for a coccinelle
> > script I think!  That function name might need a rethink along with the
> > parameter change.  
> 
> That was my first idea, but then I was like why do we even have to call 
> notify_done()? Can't we automate this, given all the bugs we had around 
> this over the years.

Maybe.   Originally thinking was that some devices would schedule work to
complete the read so it might not correspond to IRQ_HANDLED.

I have no idea if there are any drivers still doing that though.

> 
> Sill work in progress: 
> https://github.com/larsclausen/linux/commit/d6ed694c9e512e1f7f3b40ad06b153feca8d7bb1 
> but I think this will work.
> 
> >
> > Hmm. Looks like we have a few drivers passing indio_dev->trig to iio_trigger_poll
> > as well which is a little odd.  mma8452 is one of them and it's not using
> > an immutable trigger or validate_trigger() so unexpected results if anyone
> > changes the trigger...  Possibly not fatal as the interrupt will probably
> > not occur but not correct either...  
> Yep, that's on my radar too. And one of the reasons to move the trigger 
> to the opaque structure so this type of error can not happen.
Indeed - the goal is good, but might take some doing to get there!

Jonathan


      reply	other threads:[~2021-10-30 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-24  9:26 [PATCH 1/2] iio: mma8452: Fix trigger reference couting Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-10-24  9:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: trigger: Fix reference counting Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-10-25 10:55   ` Sa, Nuno
2021-10-28 14:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-28 16:04     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-10-28 16:12       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-28 14:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] iio: mma8452: Fix trigger reference couting Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-28 19:52   ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-10-30 15:03     ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-10-30 15:12       ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-10-30 17:08         ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211030180856.45345c1a@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfuzzey@parkeon.com \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.