From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <houtao1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] selftests/bpf: fix checkpatch error on empty function parameter
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 22:16:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211210141652.877186-3-houtao1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211210141652.877186-1-houtao1@huawei.com>
Fix checkpatch error: "ERROR: Bad function definition - void foo()
should probably be void foo(void)". Most replacements are done by
the following command:
sed -i 's#\([a-z]\)()$#\1(void)#g' testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/*.c
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h | 9 +++----
.../selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_count.c | 2 +-
.../selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_rename.c | 16 ++++++-------
.../selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c | 14 +++++------
.../selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c | 24 +++++++++----------
6 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
index 3d6082b97a56..ffe5752f3324 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static int bump_memlock_rlimit(void)
return setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_new);
}
-void setup_libbpf()
+void setup_libbpf(void)
{
int err;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h
index 50785503756b..fb3e213df3dc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ struct bench_res {
struct bench {
const char *name;
- void (*validate)();
- void (*setup)();
+ void (*validate)(void);
+ void (*setup)(void);
void *(*producer_thread)(void *ctx);
void *(*consumer_thread)(void *ctx);
void (*measure)(struct bench_res* res);
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct counter {
extern struct env env;
extern const struct bench *bench;
-void setup_libbpf();
+void setup_libbpf(void);
void hits_drops_report_progress(int iter, struct bench_res *res, long delta_ns);
void hits_drops_report_final(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt);
void false_hits_report_progress(int iter, struct bench_res *res, long delta_ns);
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ void false_hits_report_final(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt);
void ops_report_progress(int iter, struct bench_res *res, long delta_ns);
void ops_report_final(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt);
-static inline __u64 get_time_ns() {
+static inline __u64 get_time_ns(void)
+{
struct timespec t;
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &t);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_count.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_count.c
index befba7a82643..078972ce208e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_count.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_count.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static struct count_local_ctx {
struct counter *hits;
} count_local_ctx;
-static void count_local_setup()
+static void count_local_setup(void)
{
struct count_local_ctx *ctx = &count_local_ctx;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_rename.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_rename.c
index c7ec114eca56..3c203b6d6a6e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_rename.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_rename.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ static struct ctx {
int fd;
} ctx;
-static void validate()
+static void validate(void)
{
if (env.producer_cnt != 1) {
fprintf(stderr, "benchmark doesn't support multi-producer!\n");
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static void measure(struct bench_res *res)
res->hits = atomic_swap(&ctx.hits.value, 0);
}
-static void setup_ctx()
+static void setup_ctx(void)
{
setup_libbpf();
@@ -71,36 +71,36 @@ static void attach_bpf(struct bpf_program *prog)
}
}
-static void setup_base()
+static void setup_base(void)
{
setup_ctx();
}
-static void setup_kprobe()
+static void setup_kprobe(void)
{
setup_ctx();
attach_bpf(ctx.skel->progs.prog1);
}
-static void setup_kretprobe()
+static void setup_kretprobe(void)
{
setup_ctx();
attach_bpf(ctx.skel->progs.prog2);
}
-static void setup_rawtp()
+static void setup_rawtp(void)
{
setup_ctx();
attach_bpf(ctx.skel->progs.prog3);
}
-static void setup_fentry()
+static void setup_fentry(void)
{
setup_ctx();
attach_bpf(ctx.skel->progs.prog4);
}
-static void setup_fexit()
+static void setup_fexit(void)
{
setup_ctx();
attach_bpf(ctx.skel->progs.prog5);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c
index 52d4a2f91dbd..da8593b3494a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_ringbufs.c
@@ -88,12 +88,12 @@ const struct argp bench_ringbufs_argp = {
static struct counter buf_hits;
-static inline void bufs_trigger_batch()
+static inline void bufs_trigger_batch(void)
{
(void)syscall(__NR_getpgid);
}
-static void bufs_validate()
+static void bufs_validate(void)
{
if (env.consumer_cnt != 1) {
fprintf(stderr, "rb-libbpf benchmark doesn't support multi-consumer!\n");
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static void ringbuf_libbpf_measure(struct bench_res *res)
res->drops = atomic_swap(&ctx->skel->bss->dropped, 0);
}
-static struct ringbuf_bench *ringbuf_setup_skeleton()
+static struct ringbuf_bench *ringbuf_setup_skeleton(void)
{
struct ringbuf_bench *skel;
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int buf_process_sample(void *ctx, void *data, size_t len)
return 0;
}
-static void ringbuf_libbpf_setup()
+static void ringbuf_libbpf_setup(void)
{
struct ringbuf_libbpf_ctx *ctx = &ringbuf_libbpf_ctx;
struct bpf_link *link;
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static void ringbuf_custom_measure(struct bench_res *res)
res->drops = atomic_swap(&ctx->skel->bss->dropped, 0);
}
-static void ringbuf_custom_setup()
+static void ringbuf_custom_setup(void)
{
struct ringbuf_custom_ctx *ctx = &ringbuf_custom_ctx;
const size_t page_size = getpagesize();
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static void perfbuf_measure(struct bench_res *res)
res->drops = atomic_swap(&ctx->skel->bss->dropped, 0);
}
-static struct perfbuf_bench *perfbuf_setup_skeleton()
+static struct perfbuf_bench *perfbuf_setup_skeleton(void)
{
struct perfbuf_bench *skel;
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ perfbuf_process_sample_raw(void *input_ctx, int cpu,
return LIBBPF_PERF_EVENT_CONT;
}
-static void perfbuf_libbpf_setup()
+static void perfbuf_libbpf_setup(void)
{
struct perfbuf_libbpf_ctx *ctx = &perfbuf_libbpf_ctx;
struct perf_event_attr attr;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c
index 049a5ad56f65..7f957c55a3ca 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ static struct trigger_ctx {
static struct counter base_hits;
-static void trigger_validate()
+static void trigger_validate(void)
{
if (env.consumer_cnt != 1) {
fprintf(stderr, "benchmark doesn't support multi-consumer!\n");
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static void trigger_measure(struct bench_res *res)
res->hits = atomic_swap(&ctx.skel->bss->hits, 0);
}
-static void setup_ctx()
+static void setup_ctx(void)
{
setup_libbpf();
@@ -67,37 +67,37 @@ static void attach_bpf(struct bpf_program *prog)
}
}
-static void trigger_tp_setup()
+static void trigger_tp_setup(void)
{
setup_ctx();
attach_bpf(ctx.skel->progs.bench_trigger_tp);
}
-static void trigger_rawtp_setup()
+static void trigger_rawtp_setup(void)
{
setup_ctx();
attach_bpf(ctx.skel->progs.bench_trigger_raw_tp);
}
-static void trigger_kprobe_setup()
+static void trigger_kprobe_setup(void)
{
setup_ctx();
attach_bpf(ctx.skel->progs.bench_trigger_kprobe);
}
-static void trigger_fentry_setup()
+static void trigger_fentry_setup(void)
{
setup_ctx();
attach_bpf(ctx.skel->progs.bench_trigger_fentry);
}
-static void trigger_fentry_sleep_setup()
+static void trigger_fentry_sleep_setup(void)
{
setup_ctx();
attach_bpf(ctx.skel->progs.bench_trigger_fentry_sleep);
}
-static void trigger_fmodret_setup()
+static void trigger_fmodret_setup(void)
{
setup_ctx();
attach_bpf(ctx.skel->progs.bench_trigger_fmodret);
@@ -183,22 +183,22 @@ static void usetup(bool use_retprobe, bool use_nop)
ctx.skel->links.bench_trigger_uprobe = link;
}
-static void uprobe_setup_with_nop()
+static void uprobe_setup_with_nop(void)
{
usetup(false, true);
}
-static void uretprobe_setup_with_nop()
+static void uretprobe_setup_with_nop(void)
{
usetup(true, true);
}
-static void uprobe_setup_without_nop()
+static void uprobe_setup_without_nop(void)
{
usetup(false, false);
}
-static void uretprobe_setup_without_nop()
+static void uretprobe_setup_without_nop(void)
{
usetup(true, false);
}
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-10 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-10 14:16 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] introduce bpf_strncmp() helper Hou Tao
2021-12-10 14:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] bpf: add bpf_strncmp helper Hou Tao
2021-12-10 14:16 ` Hou Tao [this message]
2021-12-10 14:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/4] selftests/bpf: add benchmark for bpf_strncmp() helper Hou Tao
2021-12-10 14:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] selftests/bpf: add test cases for bpf_strncmp() Hou Tao
2021-12-12 1:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] introduce bpf_strncmp() helper Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211210141652.877186-3-houtao1@huawei.com \
--to=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.