[PATCH 3/8] KVM: SVM: Unwind "speculative" RIP advancement if INTn injection "fails"

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] KVM: SVM: Unwind "speculative" RIP advancement if INTn injection "fails"
Date: Sat,  2 Apr 2022 01:08:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220402010903.727604-4-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220402010903.727604-1-seanjc@google.com>

Unwind the RIP advancement done by svm_queue_exception() when injecting
an INT3 ultimately "fails" due to the CPU encountering a VM-Exit while
vectoring the injected event, even if the exception reported by the CPU
isn't the same event that was injected.  If vectoring INT3 encounters an
exception, e.g. #NP, and vectoring the #NP encounters an intercepted
exception, e.g. #PF when KVM is using shadow paging, then the #NP will
be reported as the event that was in-progress.

Note, this is still imperfect, as it will get a false positive if the
INT3 is cleanly injected, no VM-Exit occurs before the IRET from the INT3
handler in the guest, the instruction following the INT3 generates an
exception (directly or indirectly), _and_ vectoring that exception
encounters an exception that is intercepted by KVM.  The false positives
could theoretically be solved by further analyzing the vectoring event,
e.g. by comparing the error code against the expected error code were an
exception to occur when vectoring the original injected exception, but
SVM without NRIPS is a complete disaster, trying to make it 100% correct
is a waste of time.

Fixes: 66b7138f9136 ("KVM: SVM: Emulate nRIP feature when reinjecting INT3")
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 2c86bd9176c6..30cef3b10838 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -3699,6 +3699,18 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	vector = exitintinfo & SVM_EXITINTINFO_VEC_MASK;
 	type = exitintinfo & SVM_EXITINTINFO_TYPE_MASK;
 
+	/*
+	 * If NextRIP isn't enabled, KVM must manually advance RIP prior to
+	 * injecting the soft exception/interrupt.  That advancement needs to
+	 * be unwound if vectoring didn't complete.  Note, the _new_ event may
+	 * not be the injected event, e.g. if KVM injected an INTn, the INTn
+	 * hit a #NP in the guest, and the #NP encountered a #PF, the #NP will
+	 * be the reported vectored event, but RIP still needs to be unwound.
+	 */
+	if (int3_injected && type == SVM_EXITINTINFO_TYPE_EXEPT &&
+	   kvm_is_linear_rip(vcpu, svm->int3_rip))
+		kvm_rip_write(vcpu, kvm_rip_read(vcpu) - int3_injected);
+
 	switch (type) {
 	case SVM_EXITINTINFO_TYPE_NMI:
 		vcpu->arch.nmi_injected = true;
@@ -3715,13 +3727,9 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		 * but re-execute the instruction instead. Rewind RIP first
 		 * if we emulated INT3 before.
 		 */
-		if (kvm_exception_is_soft(vector)) {
-			if (vector == BP_VECTOR && int3_injected &&
-			    kvm_is_linear_rip(vcpu, svm->int3_rip))
-				kvm_rip_write(vcpu,
-					      kvm_rip_read(vcpu) - int3_injected);
+		if (kvm_exception_is_soft(vector))
 			break;
-		}
+
 		if (exitintinfo & SVM_EXITINTINFO_VALID_ERR) {
 			u32 err = svm->vmcb->control.exit_int_info_err;
 			kvm_requeue_exception_e(vcpu, vector, err);
-- 
2.35.1.1094.g7c7d902a7c-goog

