All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: SVM: Stuff next_rip on emulated INT3 injection if NRIPS is supported
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 02:14:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220423021411.784383-5-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220423021411.784383-1-seanjc@google.com>

If NRIPS is supported in hardware but disabled in KVM, set next_rip to
the next RIP when advancing RIP as part of emulating INT3 injection.
There is no flag to tell the CPU that KVM isn't using next_rip, and so
leaving next_rip is left as is will result in the CPU pushing garbage
onto the stack when vectoring the injected event.

Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Fixes: 66b7138f9136 ("KVM: SVM: Emulate nRIP feature when reinjecting INT3")
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 82175a13c668..14bc4e87437b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -392,6 +392,10 @@ static void svm_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		 */
 		(void)svm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
 		rip = kvm_rip_read(vcpu);
+
+		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NRIPS))
+			svm->vmcb->control.next_rip = rip;
+
 		svm->int3_rip = rip + svm->vmcb->save.cs.base;
 		svm->int3_injected = rip - old_rip;
 	}
@@ -3703,7 +3707,7 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	/*
 	 * If NextRIP isn't enabled, KVM must manually advance RIP prior to
 	 * injecting the soft exception/interrupt.  That advancement needs to
-	 * be unwound if vectoring didn't complete.  Note, the _new_ event may
+	 * be unwound if vectoring didn't complete.  Note, the new event may
 	 * not be the injected event, e.g. if KVM injected an INTn, the INTn
 	 * hit a #NP in the guest, and the #NP encountered a #PF, the #NP will
 	 * be the reported vectored event, but RIP still needs to be unwound.
-- 
2.36.0.rc2.479.g8af0fa9b8e-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-23  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-23  2:14 [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: SVM: Fix soft int/ex re-injection Sean Christopherson
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] KVM: nSVM: Sync next_rip field from vmcb12 to vmcb02 Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28  9:33   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: SVM: Don't BUG if userspace injects a soft interrupt with GIF=0 Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28  7:35   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-28 13:27     ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-28 14:34       ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-28 15:04         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28 16:33           ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: SVM: Unwind "speculative" RIP advancement if INTn injection "fails" Sean Christopherson
2022-04-23  2:14 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] KVM: SVM: Re-inject INT3/INTO instead of retrying the instruction Sean Christopherson
2022-04-25 22:59   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-28  9:37   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-28 13:36     ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-28 14:25       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] KVM: SVM: Re-inject INTn instead of retrying the insn on "failure" Sean Christopherson
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] KVM: x86: Trace re-injected exceptions Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28  9:48   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] KVM: x86: Print error code in exception injection tracepoint iff valid Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28  9:49   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] KVM: x86: Differentiate Soft vs. Hard IRQs vs. reinjected in tracepoint Sean Christopherson
2022-04-25 22:59   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] KVM: selftests: nSVM: Add svm_nested_soft_inject_test Sean Christopherson
2022-04-25 23:00   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-23  2:14 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] KVM: SVM: Drop support for CPUs without NRIPS (NextRIP Save) support Sean Christopherson
2022-04-24  9:34   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-25 23:00   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-25 23:01 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: SVM: Fix soft int/ex re-injection Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-27 18:21   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220423021411.784383-5-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.