All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] fsnotify: consistent behavior for parent not watching children
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 22:02:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220511190213.831646-3-amir73il@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220511190213.831646-1-amir73il@gmail.com>

The logic for handling events on child in groups that have a mark on
the parent inode, but without FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD flag in the mask is
duplicated in several places and inconsistent.

Move the logic into the preparation of mark type iterator, so that the
parent mark type will be excluded from all mark type iterations in that
case.

This results in several subtle changes of behavior, hopefully all
desired changes of behavior, for example:

- Group A has a mount mark with FS_MODIFY in mask
- Group A has a mark with ignore mask that does not survive FS_MODIFY
  and does not watch children on directory D.
- Group B has a mark with FS_MODIFY in mask that does watch children
  on directory D.
- FS_MODIFY event on file D/foo should not clear the ignore mask of
  group A, but before this change it does

And if group A ignore mask was set to survive FS_MODIFY:
- FS_MODIFY event on file D/foo should be reported to group A on account
  of the mount mark, but before this change it is wrongly ignored

Fixes: 2f02fd3fa13e ("fanotify: fix ignore mask logic for events on child and on dir")
Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20220314113337.j7slrb5srxukztje@quack3.lan/
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
 fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 10 +---------
 fs/notify/fsnotify.c          | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
index 263d303d8f8f..4f897e109547 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static u32 fanotify_group_event_mask(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 	}
 
 	fsnotify_foreach_iter_mark_type(iter_info, mark, type) {
-		/* Apply ignore mask regardless of ISDIR and ON_CHILD flags */
+		/* Apply ignore mask regardless of mark's ISDIR flag */
 		marks_ignored_mask |= mark->ignored_mask;
 
 		/*
@@ -330,14 +330,6 @@ static u32 fanotify_group_event_mask(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 		if (event_mask & FS_ISDIR && !(mark->mask & FS_ISDIR))
 			continue;
 
-		/*
-		 * If the event is on a child and this mark is on a parent not
-		 * watching children, don't send it!
-		 */
-		if (type == FSNOTIFY_ITER_TYPE_PARENT &&
-		    !(mark->mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD))
-			continue;
-
 		marks_mask |= mark->mask;
 
 		/* Record the mark types of this group that matched the event */
diff --git a/fs/notify/fsnotify.c b/fs/notify/fsnotify.c
index c5bb2405ead3..2c9a13c31ac9 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fsnotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fsnotify.c
@@ -290,22 +290,15 @@ static int fsnotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group, __u32 mask,
 	}
 
 	if (parent_mark) {
-		/*
-		 * parent_mark indicates that the parent inode is watching
-		 * children and interested in this event, which is an event
-		 * possible on child. But is *this mark* watching children and
-		 * interested in this event?
-		 */
-		if (parent_mark->mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD) {
-			ret = fsnotify_handle_inode_event(group, parent_mark, mask,
-							  data, data_type, dir, name, 0);
-			if (ret)
-				return ret;
-		}
-		if (!inode_mark)
-			return 0;
+		ret = fsnotify_handle_inode_event(group, parent_mark, mask,
+						  data, data_type, dir, name, 0);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 	}
 
+	if (!inode_mark)
+		return 0;
+
 	if (mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD) {
 		/*
 		 * Some events can be sent on both parent dir and child marks
@@ -422,8 +415,19 @@ static bool fsnotify_iter_select_report_types(
 	iter_info->report_mask = 0;
 	fsnotify_foreach_iter_type(type) {
 		mark = iter_info->marks[type];
-		if (mark && mark->group == iter_info->current_group)
+		if (mark && mark->group == iter_info->current_group) {
+			/*
+			 * FSNOTIFY_ITER_TYPE_PARENT indicates that this inode
+			 * is watching children and interested in this event,
+			 * which is an event possible on child.
+			 * But is *this mark* watching children?
+			 */
+			if (type == FSNOTIFY_ITER_TYPE_PARENT &&
+			    !(mark->mask & FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD))
+				continue;
+
 			fsnotify_iter_set_report_type(iter_info, type);
+		}
 	}
 
 	return true;
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-11 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-11 19:02 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fixes for fanotify parent dir ignore mask logic Amir Goldstein
2022-05-11 19:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] fsnotify: introduce mark type iterator Amir Goldstein
2022-05-11 19:02 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2022-06-20 14:16   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] fsnotify: consistent behavior for parent not watching children Amir Goldstein
2022-06-20 20:34     ` Greg KH
2022-06-21  3:04       ` Amir Goldstein
2022-06-23 16:09         ` Greg KH
2022-06-24  8:41           ` Amir Goldstein
2022-05-18 13:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Fixes for fanotify parent dir ignore mask logic Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220511190213.831646-3-amir73il@gmail.com \
    --to=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.