All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] cpufreq: make interface functions and lock holding state clear
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 09:59:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220513042925.42hvv26ejup6js3h@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220512135231.10076-2-schspa@gmail.com>

On 12-05-22, 21:52, Schspa Shi wrote:
> cpufreq_offline() calls offline() and exit() under the policy rwsem
> But they are called outside the rwsem in cpufreq_online().
> 
> This patch move the offline(), exit(), online(), init() to be inside
> of policy rwsem to achieve a clear lock relationship.
> 
> All the init() online() implement only initialize policy object without
> holding this lock and won't call cpufreq APIs need to hold this lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-13  4:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-12 13:52 [PATCH v4 1/2] cpufreq: fix race on cpufreq online Schspa Shi
2022-05-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] cpufreq: make interface functions and lock holding state clear Schspa Shi
2022-05-12 14:44   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-12 16:01     ` Schspa Shi
2022-05-12 16:23       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-05-13  4:29   ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2022-05-15  9:53   ` [cpufreq] 0a020f0eff: WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected kernel test robot
2022-05-15  9:53     ` kernel test robot
2022-05-16  2:35     ` Schspa Shi
2022-05-16  2:35       ` Schspa Shi
2022-05-13  4:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] cpufreq: fix race on cpufreq online Viresh Kumar
2022-05-13  6:06   ` Schspa Shi
2022-05-13  6:13     ` Viresh Kumar
2022-05-13 11:16       ` Schspa Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220513042925.42hvv26ejup6js3h@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=schspa@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.