All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com, seanjc@google.com,
	Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] kvm: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 21:41:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220523214110.1282480-2-aaronlewis@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220523214110.1282480-1-aaronlewis@google.com>

When building an event list for the pmu event filter, fitting all the
events in the limited space can be a challenge.  It becomes
particularly challenging when trying to include various unit mask
combinations for a particular event the guest is allow to or not allow
to program.  Instead of increasing the size of the list to allow for
these, add a new encoding in the pmu event filter's events field. These
encoded events can then be used to test against the event the guest is
attempting to program to determine if the guest should have access to
it.

The encoded values are: mask, match, and invert.  When filtering events
the mask is applied to the guest's unit mask to see if it matches the
match value (ie: unit_mask & mask == match).  If it does and the pmu
event filter is an allow list the event is allowed, and denied if it's
a deny list.  Additionally, the result is reversed if the invert flag
is set in the encoded event.

This feature is enabled by setting the flags field to
KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS.

Events can be encoded by using KVM_PMU_EVENT_ENCODE_MASKED_EVENT().

It is an error to have a bit set outside valid encoded bits, and calls
to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will return -EINVAL in such cases,
including bits that are set in the high nybble[1] for AMD if called on
Intel.

[1] bits 35:32 in the event and bits 11:8 in the eventsel.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
Change-Id: I64a0d54f0215eb09f3bb9ecae5c2a6dbcec32f93
---
 Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst  |  46 ++++++++++--
 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |   8 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c              | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h              |   1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c          |  12 +++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c    |  12 +++
 6 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
index 4a900cdbc62e..671c0bb06eb5 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
@@ -4951,7 +4951,13 @@ using this ioctl.
 :Architectures: x86
 :Type: vm ioctl
 :Parameters: struct kvm_pmu_event_filter (in)
-:Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error
+:Returns: 0 on success,
+    -EFAULT args[0] cannot be accessed.
+    -EINVAL args[0] contains invalid data in the filter or events field.
+                    Note: event validation is only done for modes where
+                    the flags field is non-zero.
+    -E2BIG nevents is too large.
+    -ENOMEM not enough memory to allocate the filter.
 
 ::
 
@@ -4964,14 +4970,42 @@ using this ioctl.
 	__u64 events[0];
   };
 
-This ioctl restricts the set of PMU events that the guest can program.
-The argument holds a list of events which will be allowed or denied.
-The eventsel+umask of each event the guest attempts to program is compared
-against the events field to determine whether the guest should have access.
+This ioctl restricts the set of PMU events the guest can program.  The
+argument holds a list of events which will be allowed or denied.
+
 The events field only controls general purpose counters; fixed purpose
 counters are controlled by the fixed_counter_bitmap.
 
-No flags are defined yet, the field must be zero.
+Valid values for 'flags'::
+
+``0``
+
+This is the default behavior for the pmu event filter, and used when the
+flags field is clear.  In this mode the eventsel+umask for the event the
+guest is attempting to program is compared against each event in the events
+field to determine whether the guest should have access to it.
+
+``KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS``
+
+In this mode each event in the events field will be encoded with mask, match,
+and invert values in addition to an eventsel.  These encoded events will be
+matched against the event the guest is attempting to program to determine
+whether the guest should have access to it.  When matching an encoded event
+with a guest event these steps are followed:
+ 1. Match the encoded eventsel to the guest eventsel.
+ 2. If that matches, match the mask and match values from the encoded event to
+    the guest's unit mask (ie: unit_mask & mask == match).
+ 3. If that matches, the guest is allow to program the event if its an allow
+    list or the guest is not allow to program the event if its a deny list.
+ 4. If the invert value is set in the encoded event, reverse the meaning of #3
+    (ie: deny if its an allow list, allow if it's a deny list).
+
+To encode an event in the pmu_event_filter use
+KVM_PMU_EVENT_ENCODE_MASKED_EVENT().
+
+If a bit is set in an encoded event that is not apart of the bits used for
+eventsel, mask, match or invert a call to KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER will
+return -EINVAL.
 
 Valid values for 'action'::
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index bf6e96011dfe..850af8ee724f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -521,6 +521,14 @@ struct kvm_pmu_event_filter {
 #define KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW 0
 #define KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY 1
 
+#define KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS (1u << 0)
+
+#define KVM_PMU_EVENT_ENCODE_MASKED_EVENT(select, mask, match, invert) \
+		((select) & 0xfful) | (((select) & 0xf00ul) << 24) | \
+		(((mask) & 0xfful) << 24) | \
+		(((match) & 0xfful) << 8) | \
+		(((invert) & 0x1ul) << 23)
+
 /* for KVM_{GET,SET,HAS}_DEVICE_ATTR */
 #define KVM_VCPU_TSC_CTRL 0 /* control group for the timestamp counter (TSC) */
 #define   KVM_VCPU_TSC_OFFSET 0 /* attribute for the TSC offset */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 0604bc29f0b8..c2a9d7841922 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -171,14 +171,99 @@ static bool pmc_resume_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static int cmp_u64(const void *pa, const void *pb)
+static inline u64 get_event(u64 eventsel)
 {
-	u64 a = *(u64 *)pa;
-	u64 b = *(u64 *)pb;
+	return eventsel & AMD64_EVENTSEL_EVENT;
+}
 
+static inline u8 get_unit_mask(u64 eventsel)
+{
+	return (eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK) >> 8;
+}
+
+static inline u8 get_counter_mask(u64 eventsel)
+{
+	return (eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_CMASK) >> 24;
+}
+
+static inline bool get_invert_comparison(u64 eventsel)
+{
+	return !!(eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INV);
+}
+
+static inline int cmp_safe64(u64 a, u64 b)
+{
 	return (a > b) - (a < b);
 }
 
+static int cmp_eventsel_event(const void *pa, const void *pb)
+{
+	return cmp_safe64(*(u64*)pa & AMD64_EVENTSEL_EVENT,
+			  *(u64*)pb & AMD64_EVENTSEL_EVENT);
+}
+
+static int cmp_u64(const void *pa, const void *pb)
+{
+	return cmp_safe64(*(u64 *)pa,
+			  *(u64 *)pb);
+}
+
+static bool is_match(u64 masked_event, u64 eventsel)
+{
+	u8 mask = get_counter_mask(masked_event);
+	u8 match = get_unit_mask(masked_event);
+	u8 unit_mask = get_unit_mask(eventsel);
+
+	return (unit_mask & mask) == match;
+}
+
+static bool is_event_allowed(u64 masked_event, u32 action)
+{
+	if (get_invert_comparison(masked_event))
+		return action != KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW;
+
+	return action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW;
+}
+
+static bool filter_masked_event(struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *filter,
+				u64 eventsel)
+{
+	u64 key = get_event(eventsel);
+	u64 *event, *evt;
+
+	event = bsearch(&key, filter->events, filter->nevents, sizeof(u64),
+			cmp_eventsel_event);
+
+	if(event) {
+		/* Walk the masked events backward looking for a match. */
+		for (evt = event; evt >= filter->events &&
+		     get_event(*evt) == get_event(eventsel); evt--)
+		     	if (is_match(*evt, eventsel))
+				return is_event_allowed(*evt, filter->action);
+
+		/* Walk the masked events forward looking for a match. */
+		for (evt = event + 1;
+		     evt < (filter->events + filter->nevents) &&
+		     get_event(*evt) == get_event(eventsel); evt++)
+			if(is_match(*evt, eventsel))
+				return is_event_allowed(*evt, filter->action);
+	}
+
+	return filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY;
+}
+
+static bool filter_default_event(struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *filter,
+				 u64 eventsel)
+{
+	u64 key = eventsel & AMD64_RAW_EVENT_MASK_NB;
+
+	if (bsearch(&key, filter->events, filter->nevents,
+		    sizeof(u64), cmp_u64))
+		return filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW;
+
+	return filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY;
+}
+
 void reprogram_gp_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 eventsel)
 {
 	u64 config;
@@ -200,14 +285,11 @@ void reprogram_gp_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 eventsel)
 
 	filter = srcu_dereference(kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter, &kvm->srcu);
 	if (filter) {
-		__u64 key = eventsel & AMD64_RAW_EVENT_MASK_NB;
-
-		if (bsearch(&key, filter->events, filter->nevents,
-			    sizeof(__u64), cmp_u64))
-			allow_event = filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW;
-		else
-			allow_event = filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY;
+		allow_event = (filter->flags & KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS) ?
+			filter_masked_event(filter, eventsel) :
+			filter_default_event(filter, eventsel);
 	}
+
 	if (!allow_event)
 		return;
 
@@ -548,8 +630,22 @@ void kvm_pmu_trigger_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 perf_hw_id)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_pmu_trigger_event);
 
+int has_invalid_event(struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *filter)
+{
+	u64 event_mask;
+	int i;
+
+	event_mask = kvm_x86_ops.pmu_ops->get_event_mask(filter->flags);
+	for(i = 0; i < filter->nevents; i++)
+		if (filter->events[i] & ~event_mask)
+			return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_pmu_event_filter(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp)
 {
+	int (*cmp)(const void *a, const void *b) = cmp_u64;
 	struct kvm_pmu_event_filter tmp, *filter;
 	size_t size;
 	int r;
@@ -561,7 +657,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_pmu_event_filter(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp)
 	    tmp.action != KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (tmp.flags != 0)
+	if (tmp.flags & ~KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (tmp.nevents > KVM_PMU_EVENT_FILTER_MAX_EVENTS)
@@ -579,10 +675,18 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_pmu_event_filter(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp)
 	/* Ensure nevents can't be changed between the user copies. */
 	*filter = tmp;
 
+	r = -EINVAL;
+	/* To maintain backwards compatibility don't validate flags == 0. */
+	if (filter->flags != 0 && has_invalid_event(filter))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	if (filter->flags & KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS)
+		cmp = cmp_eventsel_event;
+
 	/*
 	 * Sort the in-kernel list so that we can search it with bsearch.
 	 */
-	sort(&filter->events, filter->nevents, sizeof(__u64), cmp_u64, NULL);
+	sort(&filter->events, filter->nevents, sizeof(u64), cmp, NULL);
 
 	mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
 	filter = rcu_replace_pointer(kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter, filter,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
index 22992b049d38..7a0c2ee9f121 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops {
 	void (*reset)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 	void (*deliver_pmi)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 	void (*cleanup)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+	u64 (*get_event_mask)(u32 flag);
 };
 
 static inline u64 pmc_bitmask(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
index 16a5ebb420cf..0cc66aa2d99a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
@@ -342,6 +342,17 @@ static void amd_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	}
 }
 
+static u64 amd_pmu_get_event_mask(u32 flag)
+{
+	if (flag == KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS)
+		return AMD64_EVENTSEL_EVENT |
+		       ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK |
+		       ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INV |
+		       ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_CMASK;
+	return AMD64_EVENTSEL_EVENT |
+	       ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK;
+}
+
 struct kvm_pmu_ops amd_pmu_ops = {
 	.pmc_perf_hw_id = amd_pmc_perf_hw_id,
 	.pmc_is_enabled = amd_pmc_is_enabled,
@@ -355,4 +366,5 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops amd_pmu_ops = {
 	.refresh = amd_pmu_refresh,
 	.init = amd_pmu_init,
 	.reset = amd_pmu_reset,
+	.get_event_mask = amd_pmu_get_event_mask,
 };
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index b82b6709d7a8..6efddb1a8d9d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -719,6 +719,17 @@ static void intel_pmu_cleanup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		intel_pmu_release_guest_lbr_event(vcpu);
 }
 
+static u64 intel_pmu_get_event_mask(u32 flag)
+{
+	if (flag == KVM_PMU_EVENT_FLAG_MASKED_EVENTS)
+		return ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT |
+		       ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK |
+		       ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INV |
+		       ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_CMASK;
+	return ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT |
+	       ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK;
+}
+
 struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops = {
 	.pmc_perf_hw_id = intel_pmc_perf_hw_id,
 	.pmc_is_enabled = intel_pmc_is_enabled,
@@ -734,4 +745,5 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops = {
 	.reset = intel_pmu_reset,
 	.deliver_pmi = intel_pmu_deliver_pmi,
 	.cleanup = intel_pmu_cleanup,
+	.get_event_mask = intel_pmu_get_event_mask,
 };
-- 
2.36.1.124.g0e6072fb45-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-23 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-23 21:41 [PATCH 0/4] kvm: x86/pmu: Introduce and test masked events Aaron Lewis
2022-05-23 21:41 ` Aaron Lewis [this message]
2022-05-24  6:04   ` [PATCH 1/4] kvm: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter kernel test robot
2022-05-24 18:27   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-24 23:17   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-23 21:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] selftests: kvm/x86: Add flags when creating a " Aaron Lewis
2022-05-23 21:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests: kvm/x86: Add testing for masked events Aaron Lewis
2022-05-23 21:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests: kvm/x86: Add testing for KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER Aaron Lewis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220523214110.1282480-2-aaronlewis@google.com \
    --to=aaronlewis@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.