All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@linux.intel.com>
To: isaku.yamahata@intel.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	isaku.yamahata@gmail.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 036/102] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow non-zero value for non-present SPTE
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 13:18:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220708051847.prn254ukwvgkdl3c@yy-desk-7060> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f74b05eca8815744ce1ad672c66033101be7369c.1656366338.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 02:53:28PM -0700, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
>
> TDX introduced a new ETP, Secure-EPT, in addition to the existing EPT.
> Secure-EPT maps protected guest memory, which is called private. Since
> Secure-EPT page tables is also protected, those page tables is also called
> private.  The existing EPT is often called shared EPT to distinguish from
> Secure-EPT.  And also page tables for share EPT is also called shared.
>
> Virtualization Exception, #VE, is a new processor exception in VMX non-root
> operation.  In certain virtualizatoin-related conditions, #VE is injected
> into guest instead of exiting from guest to VMM so that guest is given a
> chance to inspect it.  One important one is EPT violation.  When
> "ETP-violation #VE" VM-execution is set, "#VE suppress bit" in EPT entry
> is cleared, #VE is injected instead of EPT violation.
>
> Because guest memory is protected with TDX, VMM can't parse instructions
> in the guest memory.  Instead, MMIO hypercall is used for guest to pass
> necessary information to VMM.
>
> To make unmodified device driver work, guest TD expects #VE on accessing
> shared GPA.  The #VE handler converts MMIO access into MMIO hypercall with
> the EPT entry of enabled "#VE" by clearing "suppress #VE" bit.  Before VMM
> enabling #VE, it needs to figure out the given GPA is for MMIO by EPT
> violation.  So the execution flow looks like
>
> - Allocate unused shared EPT entry with suppress #VE bit set.
> - EPT violation on that GPA.
> - VMM figures out the faulted GPA is for MMIO.
> - VMM clears the suppress #VE bit.
> - Guest TD gets #VE, and converts MMIO access into MMIO hypercall.
> - If the GPA maps guest memory, VMM resolves it with guest pages.
>
> For both cases, SPTE needs suppress #VE" bit set initially when it
> is allocated or zapped, therefore non-zero non-present value for SPTE
> needs to be allowed.
>
> This change requires to update FNAME(sync_page) for shadow EPT.
> "if(!sp->spte[i])" in FNAME(sync_page) means that the spte entry is the
> initial value.  With the introduction of shadow_nonpresent_value which can
> be non-zero, it doesn't hold any more. Replace zero check with
> "!is_shadow_present_pte() && !is_mmio_spte()".
>
> When "if (!spt[i])" doesn't hold, but the entry value is
> shadow_nonpresent_value, the entry is wrongly synchronized from non-present
> to non-present with (wrongly) pfn changed and tries to remove rmap wrongly
> and BUG_ON() is hit.
>
> TDP MMU uses REMOVED_SPTE = 0x5a0ULL as special constant to indicate the
> intermediate value to indicate one thread is operating on it and the value
> should be semi-arbitrary value.  For TDX (more correctly to use #VE), the
> value should include suppress #VE value which is SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE.
> Rename REMOVED_SPTE to __REMOVED_SPTE and define REMOVED_SPTE as
> SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE | REMOVED_SPTE to set suppress #VE bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c         | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h |  3 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c        |  5 +++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h        | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c     | 23 +++++++++-----
>  5 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 51306b80f47c..f239b6cb5d53 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -668,6 +668,44 @@ static void walk_shadow_page_lockless_end(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	}
>  }
>
> +static inline void kvm_init_shadow_page(void *page)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +	int ign;
> +
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(shadow_nonpresent_value != SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
> +	asm volatile (
> +		"rep stosq\n\t"
> +		: "=c"(ign), "=D"(page)
> +		: "a"(SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE), "c"(4096/8), "D"(page)
> +		: "memory"
> +	);
> +#else
> +	BUG();
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +static int mmu_topup_shadow_page_cache(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc = &vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache;
> +	int start, end, i, r;
> +	bool is_tdp_mmu = is_tdp_mmu_enabled(vcpu->kvm);
> +
> +	if (is_tdp_mmu && shadow_nonpresent_value)
> +		start = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_nr_free_objects(mc);
> +
> +	r = kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(mc, PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL);
> +	if (r)
> +		return r;
> +
> +	if (is_tdp_mmu && shadow_nonpresent_value) {
> +		end = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_nr_free_objects(mc);
> +		for (i = start; i < end; i++)
> +			kvm_init_shadow_page(mc->objects[i]);
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int mmu_topup_memory_caches(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool maybe_indirect)
>  {
>  	int r;
> @@ -677,8 +715,7 @@ static int mmu_topup_memory_caches(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool maybe_indirect)
>  				       1 + PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL + PTE_PREFETCH_NUM);
>  	if (r)
>  		return r;
> -	r = kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache,
> -				       PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL);
> +	r = mmu_topup_shadow_page_cache(vcpu);
>  	if (r)
>  		return r;
>  	if (maybe_indirect) {
> @@ -5521,9 +5558,16 @@ void kvm_configure_mmu(bool enable_tdp, int tdp_forced_root_level,
>  	 * what is used by the kernel for any given HVA, i.e. the kernel's
>  	 * capabilities are ultimately consulted by kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust().
>  	 */
> -	if (tdp_enabled)
> +	if (tdp_enabled) {
> +		/*
> +		 * For TDP MMU, always set bit 63 for TDX support. See the
> +		 * comment on SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE.
> +		 */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +		shadow_nonpresent_value = SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE;
> +#endif
>  		max_huge_page_level = tdp_huge_page_level;
> -	else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES))
> +	} else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES))
>  		max_huge_page_level = PG_LEVEL_1G;
>  	else
>  		max_huge_page_level = PG_LEVEL_2M;
> @@ -5654,7 +5698,8 @@ int kvm_mmu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache.kmem_cache = mmu_page_header_cache;
>  	vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache.gfp_zero = __GFP_ZERO;
>
> -	vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache.gfp_zero = __GFP_ZERO;
> +	if (!(is_tdp_mmu_enabled(vcpu->kvm) && shadow_nonpresent_value))
> +		vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache.gfp_zero = __GFP_ZERO;

I'm not sure why skip this for TDX, arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache is
still used for allocating sp->spt which used to track the S-EPT in kvm
for tdx guest.  Anything I missed for this ?

>
>  	vcpu->arch.mmu = &vcpu->arch.root_mmu;
>  	vcpu->arch.walk_mmu = &vcpu->arch.root_mmu;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
> index fe35d8fd3276..ee2fb0c073f3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
> @@ -1031,7 +1031,8 @@ static int FNAME(sync_page)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
>  		gpa_t pte_gpa;
>  		gfn_t gfn;
>
> -		if (!sp->spt[i])
> +		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(sp->spt[i]) &&
> +		    !is_mmio_spte(sp->spt[i]))
>  			continue;
>
>  		pte_gpa = first_pte_gpa + i * sizeof(pt_element_t);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
> index cda1851ec155..bd441458153f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ u64 __read_mostly shadow_present_mask;
>  u64 __read_mostly shadow_me_value;
>  u64 __read_mostly shadow_me_mask;
>  u64 __read_mostly shadow_acc_track_mask;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +u64 __read_mostly shadow_nonpresent_value;
> +#endif
>
>  u64 __read_mostly shadow_nonpresent_or_rsvd_mask;
>  u64 __read_mostly shadow_nonpresent_or_rsvd_lower_gfn_mask;
> @@ -360,7 +363,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_set_mmio_spte_mask(u64 mmio_value, u64 mmio_mask, u64 access_mask)
>  	 * not set any RWX bits.
>  	 */
>  	if (WARN_ON((mmio_value & mmio_mask) != mmio_value) ||
> -	    WARN_ON(mmio_value && (REMOVED_SPTE & mmio_mask) == mmio_value))
> +	    WARN_ON(mmio_value && (__REMOVED_SPTE & mmio_mask) == mmio_value))
>  		mmio_value = 0;
>
>  	if (!mmio_value)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
> index 0127bb6e3c7d..1bfedbe0585f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
> @@ -140,6 +140,19 @@ static_assert(MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_BITS == 8 && MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_BITS == 11);
>
>  #define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_BITS + MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_BITS - 1, 0)
>
> +/*
> + * non-present SPTE value for both VMX and SVM for TDP MMU.
> + * For SVM NPT, for non-present spte (bit 0 = 0), other bits are ignored.
> + * For VMX EPT, bit 63 is ignored if #VE is disabled.
> + *              bit 63 is #VE suppress if #VE is enabled.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +#define SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE	BIT_ULL(63)
> +static_assert(!(SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE & SPTE_MMU_PRESENT_MASK));
> +#else
> +#define SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE	0ULL
> +#endif
> +
>  extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_host_writable_mask;
>  extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_mmu_writable_mask;
>  extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_nx_mask;
> @@ -154,6 +167,12 @@ extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_present_mask;
>  extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_me_value;
>  extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_me_mask;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_nonpresent_value;
> +#else
> +#define shadow_nonpresent_value	0ULL
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   * SPTEs in MMUs without A/D bits are marked with SPTE_TDP_AD_DISABLED_MASK;
>   * shadow_acc_track_mask is the set of bits to be cleared in non-accessed
> @@ -174,9 +193,12 @@ extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_nonpresent_or_rsvd_mask;
>
>  /*
>   * If a thread running without exclusive control of the MMU lock must perform a
> - * multi-part operation on an SPTE, it can set the SPTE to REMOVED_SPTE as a
> + * multi-part operation on an SPTE, it can set the SPTE to __REMOVED_SPTE as a
>   * non-present intermediate value. Other threads which encounter this value
> - * should not modify the SPTE.
> + * should not modify the SPTE.  For the case that TDX is enabled,
> + * SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE, which is "suppress #VE" bit set because TDX module
> + * always enables "EPT violation #VE".  The bit is ignored by non-TDX case as
> + * present bit (bit 0) is cleared.
>   *
>   * Use a semi-arbitrary value that doesn't set RWX bits, i.e. is not-present on
>   * bot AMD and Intel CPUs, and doesn't set PFN bits, i.e. doesn't create a L1TF
> @@ -184,10 +206,17 @@ extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_nonpresent_or_rsvd_mask;
>   *
>   * Only used by the TDP MMU.
>   */
> -#define REMOVED_SPTE	0x5a0ULL
> +#define __REMOVED_SPTE	0x5a0ULL
>
>  /* Removed SPTEs must not be misconstrued as shadow present PTEs. */
> -static_assert(!(REMOVED_SPTE & SPTE_MMU_PRESENT_MASK));
> +static_assert(!(__REMOVED_SPTE & SPTE_MMU_PRESENT_MASK));
> +static_assert(!(__REMOVED_SPTE & SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE));
> +
> +/*
> + * See above comment around __REMOVED_SPTE.  REMOVED_SPTE is the actual
> + * intermediate value set to the removed SPET.  it sets the "suppress #VE" bit.
> + */
> +#define REMOVED_SPTE	(SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE | __REMOVED_SPTE)
>
>  static inline bool is_removed_spte(u64 spte)
>  {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 7b9265d67131..2ca03ec3bf52 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -692,8 +692,16 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	 * overwrite the special removed SPTE value. No bookkeeping is needed
>  	 * here since the SPTE is going from non-present to non-present.  Use
>  	 * the raw write helper to avoid an unnecessary check on volatile bits.
> +	 *
> +	 * Set non-present value to SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE, rather than 0.
> +	 * It is because when TDX is enabled, TDX module always
> +	 * enables "EPT-violation #VE", so KVM needs to set
> +	 * "suppress #VE" bit in EPT table entries, in order to get
> +	 * real EPT violation, rather than TDVMCALL.  KVM sets
> +	 * SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE (which sets "suppress #VE" bit) so it
> +	 * can be set when EPT table entries are zapped.
>  	 */
> -	__kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(iter->sptep, 0);
> +	__kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(iter->sptep, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
>
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -870,8 +878,8 @@ static void __tdp_mmu_zap_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>  			continue;
>
>  		if (!shared)
> -			tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
> -		else if (tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter, 0))
> +			tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
> +		else if (tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE))
>  			goto retry;
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -927,8 +935,9 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte)))
>  		return false;
>
> -	__tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, kvm_mmu_page_as_id(sp), sp->ptep, old_spte, 0,
> -			   sp->gfn, sp->role.level + 1, true, true);
> +	__tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, kvm_mmu_page_as_id(sp), sp->ptep, old_spte,
> +			   SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE, sp->gfn, sp->role.level + 1,
> +			   true, true);
>
>  	return true;
>  }
> @@ -965,7 +974,7 @@ static bool tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>  		    !is_last_spte(iter.old_spte, iter.level))
>  			continue;
>
> -		tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
> +		tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
>  		flush = true;
>  	}
>
> @@ -1330,7 +1339,7 @@ static bool set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
>  	 * invariant that the PFN of a present * leaf SPTE can never change.
>  	 * See __handle_changed_spte().
>  	 */
> -	tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, 0);
> +	tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
>
>  	if (!pte_write(range->pte)) {
>  		new_spte = kvm_mmu_changed_pte_notifier_make_spte(iter->old_spte,
> --
> 2.25.1
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-08  5:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 219+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-27 21:52 [PATCH v7 000/102] KVM TDX basic feature support isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:52 ` [PATCH v7 001/102] KVM: x86: Move check_processor_compatibility from init ops to runtime ops isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:52 ` [PATCH v7 002/102] Partially revert "KVM: Pass kvm_init()'s opaque param to additional arch funcs" isaku.yamahata
2022-07-13  1:55   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-26 23:57     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:52 ` [PATCH v7 003/102] KVM: Refactor CPU compatibility check on module initialiization isaku.yamahata
2022-07-12  1:15   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-13  3:16     ` Kai Huang
2022-07-13  3:11   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-27 22:04   ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:52 ` [PATCH v7 004/102] KVM: VMX: Move out vmx_x86_ops to 'main.c' to wrap VMX and TDX isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:52 ` [PATCH v7 005/102] x86/virt/vmx/tdx: export platform_tdx_enabled() isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:52 ` [PATCH v7 006/102] KVM: TDX: Detect CPU feature on kernel module initialization isaku.yamahata
2022-06-28  3:43   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-11 23:48     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-12  0:45       ` Kai Huang
2022-06-27 21:52 ` [PATCH v7 007/102] KVM: Enable hardware before doing arch VM initialization isaku.yamahata
2022-06-28  2:59   ` Kai Huang
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 008/102] KVM: x86: Refactor KVM VMX module init/exit functions isaku.yamahata
2022-06-28  3:53   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-12  0:38     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-12  1:30       ` Kai Huang
2022-07-27  0:44         ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 009/102] KVM: TDX: Add placeholders for TDX VM/vcpu structure isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 010/102] x86/virt/tdx: Add a helper function to return system wide info about TDX module isaku.yamahata
2022-07-07  2:46   ` Yuan Yao
2022-07-12  0:39     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 011/102] KVM: TDX: Initialize TDX module when loading kvm_intel.ko isaku.yamahata
2022-06-28  4:31   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-12  0:46     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-12  1:13       ` Kai Huang
2022-07-27  0:39         ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-27  4:38           ` Kai Huang
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 012/102] KVM: x86: Introduce vm_type to differentiate default VMs from confidential VMs isaku.yamahata
2022-06-28  2:52   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-04  6:44     ` Kai Huang
2022-07-12  1:01     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-12  1:24       ` Kai Huang
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 013/102] KVM: TDX: Make TDX VM type supported isaku.yamahata
2022-07-07  2:55   ` Yuan Yao
2022-07-12  1:06     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 014/102] [MARKER] The start of TDX KVM patch series: TDX architectural definitions isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 015/102] KVM: TDX: Define " isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 016/102] KVM: TDX: Add TDX "architectural" error codes isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 017/102] KVM: TDX: Add C wrapper functions for SEAMCALLs to the TDX module isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 018/102] KVM: TDX: Add helper functions to print TDX SEAMCALL error isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 019/102] [MARKER] The start of TDX KVM patch series: TD VM creation/destruction isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 020/102] KVM: TDX: Stub in tdx.h with structs, accessors, and VMCS helpers isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 021/102] x86/cpu: Add helper functions to allocate/free TDX private host key id isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 022/102] KVM: TDX: create/destroy VM structure isaku.yamahata
2022-07-07  6:16   ` Yuan Yao
2022-07-12  6:21     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-08-02 19:46   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-11 18:29     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 023/102] KVM: TDX: x86: Add ioctl to get TDX systemwide parameters isaku.yamahata
2022-07-07  6:48   ` Yuan Yao
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 024/102] KVM: TDX: Add place holder for TDX VM specific mem_enc_op ioctl isaku.yamahata
2022-07-07  7:12   ` Yuan Yao
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 025/102] KVM: TDX: initialize VM with TDX specific parameters isaku.yamahata
2022-06-28  8:30   ` Xiaoyao Li
2022-07-12  7:11     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 026/102] KVM: TDX: Make pmu_intel.c ignore guest TD case isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 027/102] [MARKER] The start of TDX KVM patch series: TD vcpu creation/destruction isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 028/102] KVM: TDX: allocate/free TDX vcpu structure isaku.yamahata
2022-08-02 19:56   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 029/102] " isaku.yamahata
2022-06-28 11:34   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-12  7:55     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 030/102] KVM: TDX: Do TDX specific vcpu initialization isaku.yamahata
2022-07-08  2:14   ` Yuan Yao
2022-07-12 20:35     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-13  0:22       ` Xiaoyao Li
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 031/102] [MARKER] The start of TDX KVM patch series: KVM MMU GPA shared bits isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 032/102] KVM: x86/mmu: introduce config for PRIVATE KVM MMU isaku.yamahata
2022-07-08  1:53   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-13  1:25     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 033/102] KVM: x86/mmu: Add address conversion functions for TDX shared bits isaku.yamahata
2022-07-08  2:15   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-13  4:52     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-13 10:41       ` Kai Huang
2022-07-14  0:14         ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 034/102] [MARKER] The start of TDX KVM patch series: KVM TDP refactoring for TDX isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 035/102] KVM: x86/mmu: Explicitly check for MMIO spte in fast page fault isaku.yamahata
2022-06-30 11:37   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-13  8:35     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-13 10:29       ` Kai Huang
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 036/102] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow non-zero value for non-present SPTE isaku.yamahata
2022-06-30 11:03   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-14 18:05     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-08  5:18   ` Yuan Yao [this message]
2022-07-08 15:30     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-11  7:05       ` Yuan Yao
2022-07-11 14:47         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-14 18:41   ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-20  2:44     ` Kai Huang
2022-07-20  3:12     ` Kai Huang
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 037/102] KVM: x86/mmu: Track shadow MMIO value/mask on a per-VM basis isaku.yamahata
2022-06-30 11:45   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-05 14:06   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-19  8:47   ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-20  3:45     ` Kai Huang
2022-07-27 23:20       ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-28  0:48         ` Kai Huang
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 038/102] KVM: x86/mmu: Disallow fast page fault on private GPA isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 039/102] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow per-VM override of the TDP max page level isaku.yamahata
2022-06-30 12:27   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-19 10:26     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 040/102] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only leaf SPTEs for deleted/moved memslot for private mmu isaku.yamahata
2022-07-01 10:41   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-19 11:06     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-19 23:17       ` Kai Huang
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 041/102] KVM: VMX: Introduce test mode related to EPT violation VE isaku.yamahata
2022-07-08  2:23   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-19 14:49     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-20  5:13       ` Kai Huang
2022-07-27 23:39         ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-28  0:54           ` Kai Huang
2022-07-28 20:11             ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-09  0:48               ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 042/102] [MARKER] The start of TDX KVM patch series: KVM TDP MMU hooks isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 043/102] KVM: x86/mmu: Focibly use TDP MMU for TDX isaku.yamahata
2022-07-11  5:48   ` Yuan Yao
2022-07-11 14:56   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-19 15:04     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 044/102] KVM: x86/mmu: Add a private pointer to struct kvm_mmu_page isaku.yamahata
2022-07-01 11:12   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-19 15:35     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-11  6:28   ` Yuan Yao
2022-07-28 19:41   ` David Matlack
2022-08-09 23:52     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-28 20:13   ` David Matlack
2022-08-09 23:50     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 045/102] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: refactor kvm_tdp_mmu_map() isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 046/102] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Support TDX private mapping for TDP MMU isaku.yamahata
2022-07-08  3:44   ` Kai Huang
2022-07-26 23:39     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-11  8:28   ` Yuan Yao
2022-07-26 23:41     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-12  2:36   ` Yuan Yao
2022-07-26 23:42     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 047/102] [MARKER] The start of TDX KVM patch series: TDX EPT violation isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 048/102] KVM: x86/mmu: Disallow dirty logging for x86 TDX isaku.yamahata
2022-07-08  2:30   ` Kai Huang
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 049/102] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Ignore unsupported mmu operation on private GFNs isaku.yamahata
2022-07-12  2:58   ` Yuan Yao
2022-07-19 18:03     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 050/102] KVM: VMX: Split out guts of EPT violation to common/exposed function isaku.yamahata
2022-07-08 10:25   ` Kai Huang
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 051/102] KVM: VMX: Move setting of EPT MMU masks to common VT-x code isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 052/102] KVM: TDX: Add load_mmu_pgd method for TDX isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 053/102] KVM: TDX: don't request KVM_REQ_APIC_PAGE_RELOAD isaku.yamahata
2022-07-12  3:47   ` Yuan Yao
2022-07-12  6:14     ` Chao Gao
2022-07-19 18:12       ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 054/102] KVM: TDX: TDP MMU TDX support isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 055/102] [MARKER] The start of TDX KVM patch series: KVM TDP MMU MapGPA isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 056/102] KVM: x86/mmu: steal software usable git to record if GFN is for shared or not isaku.yamahata
2022-07-18  8:37   ` Yuan Yao
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 057/102] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: implement MapGPA hypercall for TDX isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 058/102] KVM: x86/mmu: Introduce kvm_mmu_map_tdp_page() for use by TDX isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 059/102] [MARKER] The start of TDX KVM patch series: TD finalization isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 060/102] KVM: TDX: Create initial guest memory isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 061/102] KVM: TDX: Finalize VM initialization isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 062/102] [MARKER] The start of TDX KVM patch series: TD vcpu enter/exit isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 063/102] KVM: TDX: Add helper assembly function to TDX vcpu isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 064/102] KVM: TDX: Implement TDX vcpu enter/exit path isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 065/102] KVM: TDX: vcpu_run: save/restore host state(host kernel gs) isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 066/102] KVM: TDX: restore host xsave state when exit from the guest TD isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:53 ` [PATCH v7 067/102] KVM: x86: Allow to update cached values in kvm_user_return_msrs w/o wrmsr isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 068/102] KVM: TDX: restore user ret MSRs isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 069/102] [MARKER] The start of TDX KVM patch series: TD vcpu exits/interrupts/hypercalls isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 070/102] KVM: TDX: complete interrupts after tdexit isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 071/102] KVM: TDX: restore debug store when TD exit isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 072/102] KVM: TDX: handle vcpu migration over logical processor isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 073/102] KVM: x86: Add a switch_db_regs flag to handle TDX's auto-switched behavior isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 074/102] KVM: TDX: Add support for find pending IRQ in a protected local APIC isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 075/102] KVM: x86: Assume timer IRQ was injected if APIC state is proteced isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 076/102] KVM: TDX: remove use of struct vcpu_vmx from posted_interrupt.c isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 077/102] KVM: TDX: Implement interrupt injection isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 078/102] KVM: TDX: Implements vcpu request_immediate_exit isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 079/102] KVM: TDX: Implement methods to inject NMI isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 080/102] KVM: VMX: Modify NMI and INTR handlers to take intr_info as function argument isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 081/102] KVM: VMX: Move NMI/exception handler to common helper isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 082/102] KVM: x86: Split core of hypercall emulation to helper function isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 083/102] KVM: TDX: Add a place holder to handle TDX VM exit isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 084/102] KVM: TDX: handle EXIT_REASON_OTHER_SMI isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 085/102] KVM: TDX: handle ept violation/misconfig exit isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 086/102] KVM: TDX: handle EXCEPTION_NMI and EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 087/102] KVM: TDX: Add a place holder for handler of TDX hypercalls (TDG.VP.VMCALL) isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 088/102] KVM: TDX: handle KVM hypercall with TDG.VP.VMCALL isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 089/102] KVM: TDX: Handle TDX PV CPUID hypercall isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 090/102] KVM: TDX: Handle TDX PV HLT hypercall isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 091/102] KVM: TDX: Handle TDX PV port io hypercall isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 092/102] KVM: TDX: Handle TDX PV MMIO hypercall isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 093/102] KVM: TDX: Implement callbacks for MSR operations for TDX isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 094/102] KVM: TDX: Handle TDX PV rdmsr/wrmsr hypercall isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 095/102] KVM: TDX: Handle TDX PV report fatal error hypercall isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 096/102] KVM: TDX: Handle TDX PV map_gpa hypercall isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 097/102] KVM: TDX: Handle TDG.VP.VMCALL<GetTdVmCallInfo> hypercall isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 098/102] KVM: TDX: Silently discard SMI request isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 099/102] KVM: TDX: Silently ignore INIT/SIPI isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 100/102] KVM: TDX: Add methods to ignore accesses to CPU state isaku.yamahata
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 101/102] Documentation/virtual/kvm: Document on Trust Domain Extensions(TDX) isaku.yamahata
2022-07-08  1:34   ` Kai Huang
2022-06-27 21:54 ` [PATCH v7 102/102] KVM: x86: design documentation on TDX support of x86 KVM TDP MMU isaku.yamahata
2022-07-11 15:17 ` [PATCH v7 000/102] KVM TDX basic feature support Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-12  5:07   ` Chao Gao
2022-07-12 10:54     ` Chao Peng
2022-07-12 17:22       ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-13  7:37         ` Chao Peng
2022-07-12 10:49   ` Chao Peng
2022-07-12 17:35     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-07-14  1:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-14  4:09   ` Xiaoyao Li
2022-07-20 14:59   ` Chao Peng
2022-07-25 13:46     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2022-07-26 14:32       ` Chao Peng
2022-07-27  9:26         ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2022-08-03 10:48           ` Chao Peng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220708051847.prn254ukwvgkdl3c@yy-desk-7060 \
    --to=yuan.yao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.