All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 11/14] x86/mm: use relaxed TLB flushes when protection is removed
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 05:02:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220718120212.3180-12-namit@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220718120212.3180-1-namit@vmware.com>

From: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>

When checking x86 PTE flags to determine whether a TLB flush is needed,
determine whether a relaxed TLB flush is sufficient. If protection is
added (NX removed or W added), indicate that a relaxed TLB flush would
suffice.

Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index 230cd1d24fe6..4f98735ab07a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -271,18 +271,23 @@ static inline enum pte_flush_type pte_flags_flush_type(unsigned long oldflags,
 	 * dirty/access bit if needed without a fault.
 	 */
 	const pteval_t flush_on_clear = _PAGE_DIRTY | _PAGE_PRESENT |
-					_PAGE_ACCESSED;
+					_PAGE_ACCESSED | _PAGE_RW;
+	const pteval_t flush_on_set = _PAGE_NX;
+	const pteval_t flush_on_set_relaxed = _PAGE_RW;
+	const pteval_t flush_on_clear_relaxed = _PAGE_NX;
 	const pteval_t software_flags = _PAGE_SOFTW1 | _PAGE_SOFTW2 |
 					_PAGE_SOFTW3 | _PAGE_SOFTW4;
-	const pteval_t flush_on_change = _PAGE_RW | _PAGE_USER | _PAGE_PWT |
+	const pteval_t flush_on_change = _PAGE_USER | _PAGE_PWT |
 			  _PAGE_PCD | _PAGE_PSE | _PAGE_GLOBAL | _PAGE_PAT |
 			  _PAGE_PAT_LARGE | _PAGE_PKEY_BIT0 | _PAGE_PKEY_BIT1 |
-			  _PAGE_PKEY_BIT2 | _PAGE_PKEY_BIT3 | _PAGE_NX;
+			  _PAGE_PKEY_BIT2 | _PAGE_PKEY_BIT3;
 	unsigned long diff = oldflags ^ newflags;
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(flush_on_clear & software_flags);
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(flush_on_clear & flush_on_change);
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(flush_on_change & software_flags);
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(flush_on_change & flush_on_clear_relaxed);
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(flush_on_change & flush_on_set_relaxed);
 
 	/* Ignore software flags */
 	diff &= ~software_flags;
@@ -301,9 +306,16 @@ static inline enum pte_flush_type pte_flags_flush_type(unsigned long oldflags,
 	if (diff & flush_on_change)
 		return PTE_FLUSH_STRICT;
 
+	if (diff & oldflags & flush_on_clear_relaxed)
+		return PTE_FLUSH_RELAXED;
+
+	if (diff & newflags & flush_on_set_relaxed)
+		return PTE_FLUSH_RELAXED;
+
 	/* Ensure there are no flags that were left behind */
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM) &&
-	    (diff & ~(flush_on_clear | software_flags | flush_on_change))) {
+	    (diff & ~(flush_on_clear | flush_on_set |
+		      software_flags | flush_on_change))) {
 		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 		return PTE_FLUSH_STRICT;
 	}
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-18 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-18 12:01 [RFC PATCH 00/14] mm: relaxed TLB flushes and other optimi Nadav Amit
2022-07-18 12:01 ` [RFC PATCH 01/14] userfaultfd: set dirty and young on writeprotect Nadav Amit
2022-07-19 20:47   ` Peter Xu
2022-07-20  9:39     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-20 13:10       ` Peter Xu
2022-07-20 15:10         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-20 19:15           ` Peter Xu
2022-07-20 19:33             ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-20 19:48               ` Peter Xu
2022-07-20 19:55                 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-20 20:22                   ` Nadav Amit
2022-07-20 20:38                     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-20 20:56                       ` Nadav Amit
2022-07-21  7:52                         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-21 14:10                           ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-20  9:42   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-20 17:36     ` Nadav Amit
2022-07-20 18:00       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-20 18:09         ` Nadav Amit
2022-07-20 18:11           ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-18 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 02/14] userfaultfd: try to map write-unprotected pages Nadav Amit
2022-07-19 20:49   ` Peter Xu
2022-07-18 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 03/14] mm/mprotect: allow exclusive anon pages to be writable Nadav Amit
2022-07-20 15:19   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-20 17:25     ` Nadav Amit
2022-07-21  7:45       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-07-18 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 04/14] mm/mprotect: preserve write with MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE Nadav Amit
2022-07-18 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 05/14] x86/mm: check exec permissions on fault Nadav Amit
2022-07-18 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 06/14] mm/rmap: avoid flushing on page_vma_mkclean_one() when possible Nadav Amit
2022-07-18 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 07/14] mm: do fix spurious page-faults for instruction faults Nadav Amit
2022-07-18 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 08/14] x86/mm: introduce flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault Nadav Amit
2022-07-18 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 09/14] mm: introduce relaxed TLB flushes Nadav Amit
2022-07-18 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 10/14] x86/mm: " Nadav Amit
2022-07-18 12:02 ` Nadav Amit [this message]
2022-07-18 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 12/14] x86/tlb: no flush on PTE change from RW->RO when PTE is clean Nadav Amit
2022-07-18 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 13/14] mm/mprotect: do not check flush type if a strict is needed Nadav Amit
2022-07-18 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 14/14] mm: conditional check of pfn in pte_flush_type Nadav Amit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220718120212.3180-12-namit@vmware.com \
    --to=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.