From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 10/13] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: use smram struct for 64 bit smram load/restore
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 18:50:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220803155011.43721-11-mlevitsk@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220803155011.43721-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Use kvm_smram_state_64 struct to save/restore the 64 bit SMM state
(used when X86_FEATURE_LM is present in the guest CPUID,
regardless of 32-bitness of the guest).
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 88 ++++++++++++++----------------------------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 3339d542a25439..4bdbc5893a1657 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -2385,24 +2385,16 @@ static void rsm_load_seg_32(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-static int rsm_load_seg_64(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, const char *smstate,
- int n)
+static void rsm_load_seg_64(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
+ const struct kvm_smm_seg_state_64 *state,
+ int n)
{
struct desc_struct desc;
- int offset;
- u16 selector;
- u32 base3;
-
- offset = 0x7e00 + n * 16;
-
- selector = GET_SMSTATE(u16, smstate, offset);
- rsm_set_desc_flags(&desc, GET_SMSTATE(u16, smstate, offset + 2) << 8);
- set_desc_limit(&desc, GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, offset + 4));
- set_desc_base(&desc, GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, offset + 8));
- base3 = GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, offset + 12);
- ctxt->ops->set_segment(ctxt, selector, &desc, base3, n);
- return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
+ rsm_set_desc_flags(&desc, state->attributes << 8);
+ set_desc_limit(&desc, state->limit);
+ set_desc_base(&desc, (u32)state->base);
+ ctxt->ops->set_segment(ctxt, state->selector, &desc, state->base >> 32, n);
}
#endif
@@ -2496,71 +2488,49 @@ static int rsm_load_state_32(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
static int rsm_load_state_64(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
- const char *smstate)
+ const struct kvm_smram_state_64 *smstate)
{
- struct desc_struct desc;
struct desc_ptr dt;
- u64 val, cr0, cr3, cr4;
- u32 base3;
- u16 selector;
int i, r;
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
- *reg_write(ctxt, i) = GET_SMSTATE(u64, smstate, 0x7ff8 - i * 8);
+ *reg_write(ctxt, i) = smstate->gprs[15 - i];
- ctxt->_eip = GET_SMSTATE(u64, smstate, 0x7f78);
- ctxt->eflags = GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, 0x7f70) | X86_EFLAGS_FIXED;
+ ctxt->_eip = smstate->rip;
+ ctxt->eflags = smstate->rflags | X86_EFLAGS_FIXED;
- val = GET_SMSTATE(u64, smstate, 0x7f68);
-
- if (ctxt->ops->set_dr(ctxt, 6, val))
+ if (ctxt->ops->set_dr(ctxt, 6, smstate->dr6))
return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
-
- val = GET_SMSTATE(u64, smstate, 0x7f60);
-
- if (ctxt->ops->set_dr(ctxt, 7, val))
+ if (ctxt->ops->set_dr(ctxt, 7, smstate->dr7))
return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
- cr0 = GET_SMSTATE(u64, smstate, 0x7f58);
- cr3 = GET_SMSTATE(u64, smstate, 0x7f50);
- cr4 = GET_SMSTATE(u64, smstate, 0x7f48);
- ctxt->ops->set_smbase(ctxt, GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, 0x7f00));
- val = GET_SMSTATE(u64, smstate, 0x7ed0);
+ ctxt->ops->set_smbase(ctxt, smstate->smbase);
- if (ctxt->ops->set_msr(ctxt, MSR_EFER, val & ~EFER_LMA))
+ if (ctxt->ops->set_msr(ctxt, MSR_EFER, smstate->efer & ~EFER_LMA))
return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
- selector = GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, 0x7e90);
- rsm_set_desc_flags(&desc, GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, 0x7e92) << 8);
- set_desc_limit(&desc, GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, 0x7e94));
- set_desc_base(&desc, GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, 0x7e98));
- base3 = GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, 0x7e9c);
- ctxt->ops->set_segment(ctxt, selector, &desc, base3, VCPU_SREG_TR);
+ rsm_load_seg_64(ctxt, &smstate->tr, VCPU_SREG_TR);
- dt.size = GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, 0x7e84);
- dt.address = GET_SMSTATE(u64, smstate, 0x7e88);
+ dt.size = smstate->idtr.limit;
+ dt.address = smstate->idtr.base;
ctxt->ops->set_idt(ctxt, &dt);
- selector = GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, 0x7e70);
- rsm_set_desc_flags(&desc, GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, 0x7e72) << 8);
- set_desc_limit(&desc, GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, 0x7e74));
- set_desc_base(&desc, GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, 0x7e78));
- base3 = GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, 0x7e7c);
- ctxt->ops->set_segment(ctxt, selector, &desc, base3, VCPU_SREG_LDTR);
+ rsm_load_seg_64(ctxt, &smstate->ldtr, VCPU_SREG_LDTR);
- dt.size = GET_SMSTATE(u32, smstate, 0x7e64);
- dt.address = GET_SMSTATE(u64, smstate, 0x7e68);
+ dt.size = smstate->gdtr.limit;
+ dt.address = smstate->gdtr.base;
ctxt->ops->set_gdt(ctxt, &dt);
- r = rsm_enter_protected_mode(ctxt, cr0, cr3, cr4);
+ r = rsm_enter_protected_mode(ctxt, smstate->cr0, smstate->cr3, smstate->cr4);
if (r != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
return r;
- for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
- r = rsm_load_seg_64(ctxt, smstate, i);
- if (r != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
- return r;
- }
+ rsm_load_seg_64(ctxt, &smstate->es, VCPU_SREG_ES);
+ rsm_load_seg_64(ctxt, &smstate->cs, VCPU_SREG_CS);
+ rsm_load_seg_64(ctxt, &smstate->ss, VCPU_SREG_SS);
+ rsm_load_seg_64(ctxt, &smstate->ds, VCPU_SREG_DS);
+ rsm_load_seg_64(ctxt, &smstate->fs, VCPU_SREG_FS);
+ rsm_load_seg_64(ctxt, &smstate->gs, VCPU_SREG_GS);
return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
}
@@ -2635,7 +2605,7 @@ static int em_rsm(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
if (emulator_has_longmode(ctxt))
- ret = rsm_load_state_64(ctxt, (const char *)&smram);
+ ret = rsm_load_state_64(ctxt, &smram.smram64);
else
#endif
ret = rsm_load_state_32(ctxt, &smram.smram32);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 6abe35f7687e2c..4e3ef63baf83df 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -9848,20 +9848,17 @@ static void enter_smm_save_seg_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-static void enter_smm_save_seg_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf, int n)
+static void enter_smm_save_seg_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct kvm_smm_seg_state_64 *state,
+ int n)
{
struct kvm_segment seg;
- int offset;
- u16 flags;
kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &seg, n);
- offset = 0x7e00 + n * 16;
-
- flags = enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8;
- put_smstate(u16, buf, offset, seg.selector);
- put_smstate(u16, buf, offset + 2, flags);
- put_smstate(u32, buf, offset + 4, seg.limit);
- put_smstate(u64, buf, offset + 8, seg.base);
+ state->selector = seg.selector;
+ state->attributes = enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8;
+ state->limit = seg.limit;
+ state->base = seg.base;
}
#endif
@@ -9909,57 +9906,51 @@ static void enter_smm_save_state_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_smram_stat
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-static void enter_smm_save_state_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *buf)
+static void enter_smm_save_state_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_smram_state_64 *smram)
{
struct desc_ptr dt;
- struct kvm_segment seg;
unsigned long val;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
- put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7ff8 - i * 8, kvm_register_read_raw(vcpu, i));
+ smram->gprs[15 - i] = kvm_register_read_raw(vcpu, i);
+
+ smram->rip = kvm_rip_read(vcpu);
+ smram->rflags = kvm_get_rflags(vcpu);
- put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7f78, kvm_rip_read(vcpu));
- put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f70, kvm_get_rflags(vcpu));
kvm_get_dr(vcpu, 6, &val);
- put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7f68, val);
+ smram->dr6 = val;
kvm_get_dr(vcpu, 7, &val);
- put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7f60, val);
-
- put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7f58, kvm_read_cr0(vcpu));
- put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7f50, kvm_read_cr3(vcpu));
- put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7f48, kvm_read_cr4(vcpu));
+ smram->dr7 = val;
- put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7f00, vcpu->arch.smbase);
+ smram->cr0 = kvm_read_cr0(vcpu);
+ smram->cr3 = kvm_read_cr3(vcpu);
+ smram->cr4 = kvm_read_cr4(vcpu);
- /* revision id */
- put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7efc, 0x00020064);
+ smram->smbase = vcpu->arch.smbase;
+ smram->smm_revison = 0x00020064;
- put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7ed0, vcpu->arch.efer);
+ smram->efer = vcpu->arch.efer;
- kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &seg, VCPU_SREG_TR);
- put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e90, seg.selector);
- put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e92, enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8);
- put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7e94, seg.limit);
- put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7e98, seg.base);
+ enter_smm_save_seg_64(vcpu, &smram->tr, VCPU_SREG_TR);
static_call(kvm_x86_get_idt)(vcpu, &dt);
- put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7e84, dt.size);
- put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7e88, dt.address);
+ smram->idtr.limit = dt.size;
+ smram->idtr.base = dt.address;
- kvm_get_segment(vcpu, &seg, VCPU_SREG_LDTR);
- put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e70, seg.selector);
- put_smstate(u16, buf, 0x7e72, enter_smm_get_segment_flags(&seg) >> 8);
- put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7e74, seg.limit);
- put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7e78, seg.base);
+ enter_smm_save_seg_64(vcpu, &smram->ldtr, VCPU_SREG_LDTR);
static_call(kvm_x86_get_gdt)(vcpu, &dt);
- put_smstate(u32, buf, 0x7e64, dt.size);
- put_smstate(u64, buf, 0x7e68, dt.address);
+ smram->gdtr.limit = dt.size;
+ smram->gdtr.base = dt.address;
- for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
- enter_smm_save_seg_64(vcpu, buf, i);
+ enter_smm_save_seg_64(vcpu, &smram->es, VCPU_SREG_ES);
+ enter_smm_save_seg_64(vcpu, &smram->cs, VCPU_SREG_CS);
+ enter_smm_save_seg_64(vcpu, &smram->ss, VCPU_SREG_SS);
+ enter_smm_save_seg_64(vcpu, &smram->ds, VCPU_SREG_DS);
+ enter_smm_save_seg_64(vcpu, &smram->fs, VCPU_SREG_FS);
+ enter_smm_save_seg_64(vcpu, &smram->gs, VCPU_SREG_GS);
}
#endif
@@ -9973,7 +9964,7 @@ static void enter_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
memset(smram.bytes, 0, sizeof(smram.bytes));
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
if (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LM))
- enter_smm_save_state_64(vcpu, (char *)&smram);
+ enter_smm_save_state_64(vcpu, &smram.smram64);
else
#endif
enter_smm_save_state_32(vcpu, &smram.smram32);
--
2.26.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-03 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-03 15:49 [PATCH v3 00/13] SMM emulation and interrupt shadow fixes Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-03 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] bug: introduce ASSERT_STRUCT_OFFSET Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] KVM: x86: emulator: em_sysexit should update ctxt->mode Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] KVM: x86: emulator: introduce emulator_recalc_and_set_mode Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-11 15:33 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-08-12 6:25 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-17 14:42 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] KVM: x86: emulator: update the emulation mode after rsm Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 21:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] KVM: x86: emulator: update the emulation mode after CR0 write Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 21:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: number of GPRs in the SMRAM image depends on the image format Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: add structs for KVM's smram layout Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 22:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: use smram structs in the common code Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 22:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: use smram struct for 32 bit smram load/restore Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 22:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 15:50 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2022-08-24 22:34 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: use smram struct for 64 " Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] KVM: x86: SVM: use smram structs Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 22:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] KVM: x86: SVM: don't save SVM state to SMRAM when VM is not long mode capable Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 22:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 15:50 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] KVM: x86: emulator/smm: preserve interrupt shadow in SMRAM Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-24 23:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-25 10:13 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-25 15:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-10 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] SMM emulation and interrupt shadow fixes Thomas Lamprecht
2022-08-10 13:25 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220803155011.43721-11-mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.