[PATCH RFC bpf-next v1 06/32] bpf: Annotate data races in bpf_local_storage

From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>,
	Delyan Kratunov <delyank@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v1 06/32] bpf: Annotate data races in bpf_local_storage
Date: Sun,  4 Sep 2022 22:41:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220904204145.3089-7-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220904204145.3089-1-memxor@gmail.com>

There are a few cases where hlist_node is checked to be unhashed without
holding the lock protecting its modification. In this case, one must use
hlist_unhashed_lockless to avoid load tearing and KCSAN reports. Fix
this by using lockless variant in places not protected by the lock.

Since this is not prompted by any actual KCSAN reports but only from
code review, I have not included a fixes tag.

Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index 4a725379d761..58cb0c179097 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -51,11 +51,21 @@ owner_storage(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap, void *owner)
 	return map->ops->map_owner_storage_ptr(owner);
 }
 
+static bool selem_linked_to_storage_lockless(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
+{
+	return !hlist_unhashed_lockless(&selem->snode);
+}
+
 static bool selem_linked_to_storage(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
 {
 	return !hlist_unhashed(&selem->snode);
 }
 
+static bool selem_linked_to_map_lockless(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
+{
+	return !hlist_unhashed_lockless(&selem->map_node);
+}
+
 static bool selem_linked_to_map(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
 {
 	return !hlist_unhashed(&selem->map_node);
@@ -182,7 +192,7 @@ static void __bpf_selem_unlink_storage(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
 	bool free_local_storage = false;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	if (unlikely(!selem_linked_to_storage(selem)))
+	if (unlikely(!selem_linked_to_storage_lockless(selem)))
 		/* selem has already been unlinked from sk */
 		return;
 
@@ -216,7 +226,7 @@ void bpf_selem_unlink_map(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
 	struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	if (unlikely(!selem_linked_to_map(selem)))
+	if (unlikely(!selem_linked_to_map_lockless(selem)))
 		/* selem has already be unlinked from smap */
 		return;
 
@@ -427,7 +437,7 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
 		err = check_flags(old_sdata, map_flags);
 		if (err)
 			return ERR_PTR(err);
-		if (old_sdata && selem_linked_to_storage(SELEM(old_sdata))) {
+		if (old_sdata && selem_linked_to_storage_lockless(SELEM(old_sdata))) {
 			copy_map_value_locked(&smap->map, old_sdata->data,
 					      value, false);
 			return old_sdata;
-- 
2.34.1

