All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/select: avoid clang stack usage warning
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 15:21:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221006222124.aabaemy7ofop7ccz@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190307090146.1874906-1-arnd@arndb.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2448 bytes --]

On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:01:36AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The select() implementation is carefully tuned to put a sensible amount
> of data on the stack for holding a copy of the user space fd_set,
> but not too large to risk overflowing the kernel stack.
> 
> When building a 32-bit kernel with clang, we need a little more space
> than with gcc, which often triggers a warning:
> 
> fs/select.c:619:5: error: stack frame size of 1048 bytes in function 'core_sys_select' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
> int core_sys_select(int n, fd_set __user *inp, fd_set __user *outp,
> 
> I experimentally found that for 32-bit ARM, reducing the maximum
> stack usage by 64 bytes keeps us reliably under the warning limit
> again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/poll.h | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/poll.h b/include/linux/poll.h
> index 7e0fdcf905d2..1cdc32b1f1b0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/poll.h
> +++ b/include/linux/poll.h
> @@ -16,7 +16,11 @@
>  extern struct ctl_table epoll_table[]; /* for sysctl */
>  /* ~832 bytes of stack space used max in sys_select/sys_poll before allocating
>     additional memory. */
> +#ifdef __clang__
> +#define MAX_STACK_ALLOC 768

Hi Arnd,
Upon a toolchain upgrade for Android, our 32b x86 image used for
first-party developer VMs started tripping -Wframe-larger-than= again
(thanks -Werror) which is blocking our ability to upgrade our toolchain.

I've attached the zstd compressed .config file that reproduces with ToT
LLVM:

$ cd linux
$ zstd -d path/to/config.zst -o .config
$ make ARCH=i386 LLVM=1 -j128 fs/select.o
fs/select.c:625:5: error: stack frame size (1028) exceeds limit (1024)
in 'core_sys_select' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
int core_sys_select(int n, fd_set __user *inp, fd_set __user *outp,
    ^

As you can see, we're just barely tipping over the limit.  Should I send
a patch to reduce this again? If so, any thoughts by how much?
Decrementing the current value by 4 builds the config in question, but
seems brittle.

Do we need to only do this if !CONFIG_64BIT?
commit ad312f95d41c ("fs/select: avoid clang stack usage warning")
seems to allude to this being more problematic on 32b targets?

> +#else
>  #define MAX_STACK_ALLOC 832
> +#endif
>  #define FRONTEND_STACK_ALLOC	256
>  #define SELECT_STACK_ALLOC	FRONTEND_STACK_ALLOC
>  #define POLL_STACK_ALLOC	FRONTEND_STACK_ALLOC
> -- 
> 2.20.0
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: config.zst --]
[-- Type: application/zstd, Size: 45882 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-06 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-07  9:01 [PATCH] fs/select: avoid clang stack usage warning Arnd Bergmann
2019-03-07 16:19 ` Andi Kleen
2022-10-06 22:21 ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2022-10-07  8:28   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-10-07 19:04     ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-07 20:11       ` [PATCH] fs/select: mark do_select noinline_for_stack for 32b Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-10  7:44         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-10 16:42           ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-10 19:55         ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-10-13 18:52         ` kernel test robot
2022-10-07 21:42       ` [PATCH] fs/select: avoid clang stack usage warning Arnd Bergmann
2022-10-07 22:54         ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-10 18:40           ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-11 12:46             ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-10-11 20:55               ` [PATCH v2] fs/select: mark do_select noinline_for_stack Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 22:39                 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-07 23:17         ` [PATCH] fs/select: avoid clang stack usage warning Kees Cook
2022-10-09 10:49       ` David Laight
2022-10-08  1:46   ` Andi Kleen
2022-10-11 20:50     ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-13 20:52       ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221006222124.aabaemy7ofop7ccz@google.com \
    --to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.