From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@intel.com>, Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] software node: Switch property entry test to a new API
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:49:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221228094922.84119-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221228094922.84119-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Switch property entry test to use software_node_register_node_group() API.
The current one is going to be removed soon.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c | 30 ++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c b/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
index 6071d5bc128c..dd2b606d76a3 100644
--- a/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
+++ b/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
@@ -405,20 +405,18 @@ static void pe_test_move_inline_str(struct kunit *test)
/* Handling of reference properties */
static void pe_test_reference(struct kunit *test)
{
- static const struct software_node nodes[] = {
- { .name = "1", },
- { .name = "2", },
- { }
- };
+ static const struct software_node node1 = { .name = "1" };
+ static const struct software_node node2 = { .name = "2" };
+ static const struct software_node *group[] = { &node1, &node2, NULL };
static const struct software_node_ref_args refs[] = {
- SOFTWARE_NODE_REFERENCE(&nodes[0]),
- SOFTWARE_NODE_REFERENCE(&nodes[1], 3, 4),
+ SOFTWARE_NODE_REFERENCE(&node1),
+ SOFTWARE_NODE_REFERENCE(&node2, 3, 4),
};
const struct property_entry entries[] = {
- PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("ref-1", &nodes[0]),
- PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("ref-2", &nodes[1], 1, 2),
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("ref-1", &node1),
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("ref-2", &node2, 1, 2),
PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF_ARRAY("ref-3", refs),
{ }
};
@@ -427,7 +425,7 @@ static void pe_test_reference(struct kunit *test)
struct fwnode_reference_args ref;
int error;
- error = software_node_register_nodes(nodes);
+ error = software_node_register_node_group(group);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
node = fwnode_create_software_node(entries, NULL);
@@ -436,7 +434,7 @@ static void pe_test_reference(struct kunit *test)
error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-1", NULL,
0, 0, &ref);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &nodes[0]);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &node1);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.nargs, 0U);
/* wrong index */
@@ -447,7 +445,7 @@ static void pe_test_reference(struct kunit *test)
error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-2", NULL,
1, 0, &ref);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &nodes[1]);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &node2);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.nargs, 1U);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[0], 1LLU);
@@ -455,7 +453,7 @@ static void pe_test_reference(struct kunit *test)
error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-2", NULL,
3, 0, &ref);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &nodes[1]);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &node2);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.nargs, 3U);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[0], 1LLU);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[1], 2LLU);
@@ -470,14 +468,14 @@ static void pe_test_reference(struct kunit *test)
error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-3", NULL,
0, 0, &ref);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &nodes[0]);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &node1);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.nargs, 0U);
/* second reference in the array */
error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-3", NULL,
2, 1, &ref);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &nodes[1]);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &node2);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.nargs, 2U);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[0], 3LLU);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[1], 4LLU);
@@ -488,7 +486,7 @@ static void pe_test_reference(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
fwnode_remove_software_node(node);
- software_node_unregister_nodes(nodes);
+ software_node_unregister_node_group(group);
}
static struct kunit_case property_entry_test_cases[] = {
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-28 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-28 9:49 [PATCH v3 0/4] software nodes: Get rid of rarely used APIs Andy Shevchenko
2022-12-28 9:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Don't dereference fwnode handle Andy Shevchenko
2022-12-28 9:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Convert to use software_node_register_node_group() Andy Shevchenko
2022-12-28 9:49 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2022-12-28 9:49 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] software node: Remove unused APIs Andy Shevchenko
2023-01-17 18:03 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] software nodes: Get rid of rarely used APIs Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221228094922.84119-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
--cc=dan.scally@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tian.shu.qiu@intel.com \
--cc=yong.zhi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.