All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>
To: kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: shr@devkernel.io, linux-mm@kvack.org, riel@surriel.com,
	mhocko@suse.com, david@redhat.com,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] mm: process/cgroup ksm support
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:28:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230310182851.2579138-1-shr@devkernel.io> (raw)

So far KSM can only be enabled by calling madvise for memory regions. To
be able to use KSM for more workloads, KSM needs to have the ability to be
enabled / disabled at the process / cgroup level.

Use case 1:
The madvise call is not available in the programming language. An example for
this are programs with forked workloads using a garbage collected language without
pointers. In such a language madvise cannot be made available.

In addition the addresses of objects get moved around as they are garbage
collected. KSM sharing needs to be enabled "from the outside" for these type of
workloads.

Use case 2:
The same interpreter can also be used for workloads where KSM brings no
benefit or even has overhead. We'd like to be able to enable KSM on a workload
by workload basis.

Use case 3:
With the madvise call sharing opportunities are only enabled for the current
process: it is a workload-local decision. A considerable number of sharing
opportuniites may exist across multiple workloads or jobs. Only a higler level
entity like a job scheduler or container can know for certain if its running
one or more instances of a job. That job scheduler however doesn't have
the necessary internal worklaod knowledge to make targeted madvise calls.

Security concerns:
In previous discussions security concerns have been brought up. The problem is
that an individual workload does not have the knowledge about what else is
running on a machine. Therefore it has to be very conservative in what memory
areas can be shared or not. However, if the system is dedicated to running
multiple jobs within the same security domain, its the job scheduler that has
the knowledge that sharing can be safely enabled and is even desirable.

Performance:
Experiments with using UKSM have shown a capacity increase of around 20%.


1. New options for prctl system command
This patch series adds two new options to the prctl system call. The first
one allows to enable KSM at the process level and the second one to query the
setting.

The setting will be inherited by child processes.

With the above setting, KSM can be enabled for the seed process of a cgroup
and all processes in the cgroup will inherit the setting.

2. Changes to KSM processing
When KSM is enabled at the process level, the KSM code will iterate over all
the VMA's and enable KSM for the eligible VMA's.

When forking a process that has KSM enabled, the setting will be inherited by
the new child process.

In addition when KSM is disabled for a process, KSM will be disabled for the
VMA's where KSM has been enabled.

3. Add general_profit metric
The general_profit metric of KSM is specified in the documentation, but not
calculated. This adds the general profit metric to /sys/kernel/debug/mm/ksm.

4. Add more metrics to ksm_stat
This adds the process profit and ksm type metric to /proc/<pid>/ksm_stat.

5. Add more tests to ksm_tests
This adds an option to specify the merge type to the ksm_tests. This allows to
test madvise and prctl KSM. It also adds a new option to query if prctl KSM has
been enabled. It adds a fork test to verify that the KSM process setting is
inherited by client processes.


Changes:
- V4:
  - removing check in prctl for MMF_VM_MERGEABLE in PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE
    handling
  - Checking for VM_MERGEABLE AND MMF_VM_MERGE_ANY to avoid chaning vm_flags
    - This requires also checking that the vma is compatible. The
      compatibility check is provided by a new helper
    - processes which have set MMF_VM_MERGE_ANY, only need to call the
      helper and not madvise.
  - removed unmerge_vmas function, this function is no longer necessary,
    clearing the MMF_VM_MERGE_ANY bit is sufficient

- V3:
  - folded patch 1 - 6
  - folded patch 7 - 14
  - folded patch 15 - 19
  - Expanded on the use cases in the cover letter
  - Added a section on security concerns to the cover letter

- V2:
  - Added use cases to the cover letter
  - Removed the tracing patch from the patch series and posted it as an
    individual patch
  - Refreshed repo



Stefan Roesch (3):
  mm: add new api to enable ksm per process
  mm: add new KSM process and sysfs knobs
  selftests/mm: add new selftests for KSM

 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-ksm |   8 +
 Documentation/admin-guide/mm/ksm.rst          |   8 +-
 fs/proc/base.c                                |   5 +
 include/linux/ksm.h                           |  19 +-
 include/linux/sched/coredump.h                |   1 +
 include/uapi/linux/prctl.h                    |   2 +
 kernel/sys.c                                  |  27 ++
 mm/ksm.c                                      | 137 +++++++---
 tools/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h              |   2 +
 tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile           |   2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_tests.c        | 254 +++++++++++++++---
 11 files changed, 388 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-03-10 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-10 18:28 Stefan Roesch [this message]
2023-03-10 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mm: add new api to enable ksm per process Stefan Roesch
2023-03-13 16:26   ` Johannes Weiner
2023-04-03 10:37   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-03 11:03     ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-04 16:32       ` Stefan Roesch
2023-04-04 16:43       ` Stefan Roesch
2023-04-05  6:51       ` Christian Borntraeger
2023-04-05 16:04         ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-03 15:50     ` Stefan Roesch
2023-04-03 17:02       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-10 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm: add new KSM process and sysfs knobs Stefan Roesch
2023-04-05 17:04   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-05 21:20     ` Stefan Roesch
2023-04-06 13:23       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-06 14:16         ` Johannes Weiner
2023-04-06 14:32           ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-10 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] selftests/mm: add new selftests for KSM Stefan Roesch
2023-03-15 20:03 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] mm: process/cgroup ksm support David Hildenbrand
2023-03-15 20:23   ` Mike Kravetz
2023-03-15 21:05   ` Johannes Weiner
2023-03-15 21:19     ` Johannes Weiner
2023-03-15 21:45       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-15 21:47         ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-30 16:19         ` Stefan Roesch
2023-03-28 23:09 ` Andrew Morton
2023-03-30  4:55   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-30 14:26     ` Johannes Weiner
2023-03-30 14:40       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-30 16:41         ` Stefan Roesch
2023-04-03  9:48           ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-03 16:34             ` Stefan Roesch
2023-04-03 17:04               ` David Hildenbrand
2023-04-06 16:59               ` Stefan Roesch
2023-04-06 17:10                 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-30 20:18     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230310182851.2579138-1-shr@devkernel.io \
    --to=shr@devkernel.io \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.