All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: [PULL 08/21] cutils: Document differences between parse_uint and qemu_strtou64
Date: Thu,  1 Jun 2023 17:02:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230601220305.2130121-9-eblake@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601220305.2130121-1-eblake@redhat.com>

These two functions are subtly different, and not just because of
swapped parameter order.  It took me adding better unit tests to
figure out why.  Document the differences to make it more obvious to
developers trying to pick which one to use, as well as to aid in
upcoming semantic changes.

While touching the documentation, adjust a mis-statement: parse_uint
does not return -EINVAL on invalid base, but assert()s, like all the
other qemu_strto* functions that take a base argument.

Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230522190441.64278-7-eblake@redhat.com>
---
 util/cutils.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/util/cutils.c b/util/cutils.c
index 9b6ce9179c4..36c14b769fd 100644
--- a/util/cutils.c
+++ b/util/cutils.c
@@ -611,6 +611,8 @@ int qemu_strtoi64(const char *nptr, const char **endptr, int base,
  * Convert string @nptr to an uint64_t.
  *
  * Works like qemu_strtoul(), except it stores UINT64_MAX on overflow.
+ * (If you want to prohibit negative numbers that wrap around to
+ * positive, use parse_uint()).
  */
 int qemu_strtou64(const char *nptr, const char **endptr, int base,
                   uint64_t *result)
@@ -721,7 +723,8 @@ const char *qemu_strchrnul(const char *s, int c)
  *
  * @s: String to parse
  * @value: Destination for parsed integer value
- * @endptr: Destination for pointer to first character not consumed
+ * @endptr: Destination for pointer to first character not consumed, must
+ * not be %NULL
  * @base: integer base, between 2 and 36 inclusive, or 0
  *
  * Parse unsigned integer
@@ -729,15 +732,16 @@ const char *qemu_strchrnul(const char *s, int c)
  * Parsed syntax is like strtoull()'s: arbitrary whitespace, a single optional
  * '+' or '-', an optional "0x" if @base is 0 or 16, one or more digits.
  *
- * If @s is null, or @base is invalid, or @s doesn't start with an
- * integer in the syntax above, set *@value to 0, *@endptr to @s, and
- * return -EINVAL.
+ * If @s is null, or @s doesn't start with an integer in the syntax
+ * above, set *@value to 0, *@endptr to @s, and return -EINVAL.
  *
  * Set *@endptr to point right beyond the parsed integer (even if the integer
  * overflows or is negative, all digits will be parsed and *@endptr will
  * point right beyond them).
  *
  * If the integer is negative, set *@value to 0, and return -ERANGE.
+ * (If you want to allow negative numbers that wrap around within
+ * bounds, use qemu_strtou64()).
  *
  * If the integer overflows unsigned long long, set *@value to
  * ULLONG_MAX, and return -ERANGE.
@@ -794,10 +798,10 @@ out:
  *
  * Parse unsigned integer from entire string
  *
- * Have the same behavior of parse_uint(), but with an additional check
- * for additional data after the parsed number. If extra characters are present
- * after the parsed number, the function will return -EINVAL, and *@v will
- * be set to 0.
+ * Have the same behavior of parse_uint(), but with an additional
+ * check for additional data after the parsed number. If extra
+ * characters are present after a non-overflowing parsed number, the
+ * function will return -EINVAL, and *@v will be set to 0.
  */
 int parse_uint_full(const char *s, unsigned long long *value, int base)
 {
-- 
2.40.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-01 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-01 22:02 [PULL 00/21] NBD and miscellaneous patches for 2023-06-01 Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:02 ` [PULL 01/21] iotests: Fix test 104 under NBD Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:02 ` [PULL 02/21] qcow2: Explicit mention of padding bytes Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:02 ` [PULL 03/21] test-cutils: Avoid g_assert in unit tests Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:02 ` [PULL 04/21] test-cutils: Use g_assert_cmpuint where appropriate Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:02 ` [PULL 05/21] test-cutils: Test integral qemu_strto* value on failures Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:02 ` [PULL 06/21] test-cutils: Test more integer corner cases Eric Blake
2023-06-02 12:34   ` Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:02 ` [PULL 07/21] cutils: Fix wraparound parsing in qemu_strtoui Eric Blake
2023-06-03  8:17   ` Michael Tokarev
2023-06-05 13:32     ` Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:02 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2023-06-01 22:02 ` [PULL 09/21] cutils: Adjust signature of parse_uint[_full] Eric Blake
2023-06-02  6:16   ` Markus Armbruster
2023-06-02 12:22     ` Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:02 ` [PULL 10/21] cutils: Allow NULL endptr in parse_uint() Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:02 ` [PULL 11/21] test-cutils: Add coverage of qemu_strtod Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:02 ` [PULL 12/21] test-cutils: Prepare for upcoming semantic change in qemu_strtosz Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:02 ` [PULL 13/21] test-cutils: Refactor qemu_strtosz tests for less boilerplate Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:02 ` [PULL 14/21] cutils: Allow NULL str in qemu_strtosz Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:02 ` [PULL 15/21] numa: Check for qemu_strtosz_MiB error Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:03 ` [PULL 16/21] test-cutils: Add more coverage to qemu_strtosz Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:03 ` [PULL 17/21] cutils: Set value in all qemu_strtosz* error paths Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:03 ` [PULL 18/21] cutils: Set value in all integral qemu_strto* " Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:03 ` [PULL 19/21] cutils: Use parse_uint in qemu_strtosz for negative rejection Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:03 ` [PULL 20/21] cutils: Improve qemu_strtod* error paths Eric Blake
2023-06-01 22:03 ` [PULL 21/21] cutils: Improve qemu_strtosz handling of fractions Eric Blake
2023-06-02  3:58 ` [PULL 00/21] NBD and miscellaneous patches for 2023-06-01 Richard Henderson
2023-06-02 12:27   ` Eric Blake
2023-06-02  6:32 ` Conclusion of yet another expensive UI folly (was: [PULL 00/21] NBD and miscellaneous patches for 2023-06-01) Markus Armbruster
2023-06-02 12:29   ` Eric Blake
2023-06-02 13:02     ` Conclusion of yet another expensive UI folly Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230601220305.2130121-9-eblake@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.