All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>,
	syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
	Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: Add config option to not allow writing to mounted devices
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 16:55:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230704205529.GH1178919@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230704184416.GE1851@sol.localdomain>

On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 11:44:16AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Does this prevent the underlying storage from being written to?  Say if the
> mounted block device is /dev/sda1 and someone tries to write to /dev/sda in the
> region that contains sda1.
> 
> I *think* the answer is no, writes to /dev/sda are still allowed since the goal
> is just to prevent writes to the buffer cache of mounted block devices, not
> writes to the underlying storage.  That is really something that should be
> stated explicitly, though.

Well, at the risk of giving the Syzbot developers any ideas, we also
aren't preventing someone from opening the SCSI generic device and
manually sending raw SCSI commands to modify a mounted block device,
and then no doubt they would claim that the kernel config
CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SG is "insecure", and so therefore any kernel that
could support writing CD or DVD's is by definition "insecure" by their
lights...

Which is why talking about security models without having an agreed
upon threat model is really a waste of time...

     	    	     	      	       - Ted
				       

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-04 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-04 12:56 [PATCH RFC 0/6 v2] block: Add config option to not allow writing to mounted devices Jan Kara
2023-07-04 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] " Jan Kara
2023-07-04 15:56   ` Colin Walters
2023-07-04 16:52     ` Eric Biggers
2023-08-14 16:41       ` Jan Kara
2023-08-14 16:43     ` Jan Kara
2023-07-04 18:44   ` Eric Biggers
2023-07-04 20:55     ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2023-07-05 10:30     ` Jan Kara
2023-07-05 15:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-08-22  5:35   ` Eric Biggers
2023-08-22 10:11     ` Jan Kara
2023-10-19  9:16       ` Aleksandr Nogikh
2023-10-24 11:10         ` Jan Kara
2023-10-27 12:06           ` Aleksandr Nogikh
2023-11-08 10:10           ` Jan Kara
2023-11-08 18:24             ` Aleksandr Nogikh
2023-07-04 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/6] fs: Block writes to mounted block devices Jan Kara
2023-07-04 12:56 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: Block writes to log device Jan Kara
2023-07-04 15:53   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-05 10:31     ` Jan Kara
2023-07-04 12:56 ` [PATCH 4/6] ext4: Block writes to journal device Jan Kara
2023-07-04 12:56 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: Block writes to seed devices Jan Kara
2023-07-12 14:33   ` David Sterba
2023-07-04 12:56 ` [PATCH 6/6] fs: Make bind mounts work with bdev_allow_write_mounted=n Jan Kara
2023-07-04 13:59   ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-05 13:00     ` Jan Kara
2023-07-05 13:46       ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-05 16:14         ` Jan Kara
2023-07-06 15:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-06 16:12     ` Jan Kara
2023-07-07  7:39       ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-07 10:48         ` Jan Kara
2023-07-07 11:31         ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-07 12:28           ` Jan Kara
2023-07-07 11:30       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-04 13:40 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6 v2] block: Add config option to not allow writing to mounted devices Christian Brauner
2023-07-05 12:27 ` Mike Fleetwood
2023-08-14 16:39   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230704205529.GH1178919@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=alex.popov@linux.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=keescook@google.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.