All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
	Philipp Jungkamp <p.jungkamp@gmx.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] iio: hid-sensor: Use aligned data type for timestamp
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 17:09:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230828170928.5264dadf@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230815154027.12468-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 18:40:27 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Use aligned_s64 for the timestamp field.
> 
> Note, the actual data is signed, hence with this we also amend that.
> While at it, drop redundant __alignment directive.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c              | 3 +--
>  drivers/iio/gyro/hid-sensor-gyro-3d.c                | 2 +-
>  drivers/iio/humidity/hid-sensor-humidity.c           | 2 +-
>  drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c                   | 2 +-
>  drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-incl-3d.c         | 2 +-
>  drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-rotation.c        | 4 ++--
>  drivers/iio/position/hid-sensor-custom-intel-hinge.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/iio/pressure/hid-sensor-press.c              | 2 +-
>  drivers/iio/temperature/hid-sensor-temperature.c     | 2 +-
>  9 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c b/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c
> index 5eac7ea19993..f739589564c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c
> @@ -25,10 +25,9 @@ struct accel_3d_state {
>  	struct hid_sensor_hub_callbacks callbacks;
>  	struct hid_sensor_common common_attributes;
>  	struct hid_sensor_hub_attribute_info accel[ACCEL_3D_CHANNEL_MAX];
> -	/* Ensure timestamp is naturally aligned */

Comment is still true and no more or less obvious than it was with the old code
I think so I don't really see why it should be removed with this change.

>  	struct {
>  		u32 accel_val[3];
> -		s64 timestamp __aligned(8);
> +		aligned_s64 timestamp;
>  	} scan;
>  	int scale_pre_decml;
>  	int scale_post_decml;
...


> diff --git a/drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-rotation.c b/drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-rotation.c
> index a033699910e8..864ecbcad26e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-rotation.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-rotation.c
> @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ struct dev_rot_state {
>  	struct hid_sensor_common common_attributes;
>  	struct hid_sensor_hub_attribute_info quaternion;
>  	struct {
> -		s32 sampled_vals[4] __aligned(16);
> -		u64 timestamp __aligned(8);
> +		s32 sampled_vals[4];

Hmm. I can't immediately recall why that aligned(16) is therebut
it's not related to the rest of this change so I'm not sure we should touch it.
I don't think we ever required quaternions to be aligned as a whole so this does feel odd but
in the category of something we should be careful touching or at very least do it in
a different patch where it stands out.


> +		aligned_s64 timestamp;
>  	} scan;
>  	int scale_pre_decml;
>  	int scale_post_decml;
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/position/hid-sensor-custom-intel-hinge.c b/drivers/iio/position/hid-sensor-custom-intel-hinge.c
> index 07c30d217255..48005b568dd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/position/hid-sensor-custom-intel-hinge.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/position/hid-sensor-custom-intel-hinge.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct hinge_state {
>  	const char *labels[CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_MAX];
>  	struct {
>  		u32 hinge_val[3];
> -		u64 timestamp __aligned(8);
> +		aligned_s64 timestamp;
>  	} scan;
>  
>  	int scale_pre_decml;
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/hid-sensor-press.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/hid-sensor-press.c
> index a9215eb32d70..a964c7b65402 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/hid-sensor-press.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/hid-sensor-press.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ struct press_state {
>  	struct hid_sensor_hub_attribute_info press_attr;
>  	struct {
>  		u32 press_data;
> -		u64 timestamp __aligned(8);
> +		aligned_s64 timestamp;
>  	} scan;
>  	int scale_pre_decml;
>  	int scale_post_decml;
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/temperature/hid-sensor-temperature.c b/drivers/iio/temperature/hid-sensor-temperature.c
> index d40f235af1d4..32f4b13fd554 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/temperature/hid-sensor-temperature.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/temperature/hid-sensor-temperature.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ struct temperature_state {
>  	struct hid_sensor_hub_attribute_info temperature_attr;
>  	struct {
>  		s32 temperature_data;
> -		u64 timestamp __aligned(8);
> +		aligned_s64 timestamp;
>  	} scan;
>  	int scale_pre_decml;
>  	int scale_post_decml;


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-28 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-15 15:40 [PATCH v1 1/3] types: Complement the aligned types with signed 64-bit one Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-15 15:40 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Use aligned data type for timestamp Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-28 16:03   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-08-29 13:18     ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-15 15:40 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] iio: hid-sensor: " Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-28 16:09   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-08-29 13:22     ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-28 16:10 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] types: Complement the aligned types with signed 64-bit one Jonathan Cameron
2023-08-29 13:22   ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230828170928.5264dadf@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.jungkamp@gmx.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.