Re: [PATCH RFC v2 02/18] cxl/mbox: Flag support for Dynamic Capacity Devices (DCD)

From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Navneet Singh <navneet.singh@intel.com>,
	Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 02/18] cxl/mbox: Flag support for Dynamic Capacity Devices (DCD)
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 15:07:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230829150732.00004181@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230604-dcd-type2-upstream-v2-2-f740c47e7916@intel.com>

On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 22:20:53 -0700
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> wrote:

> Per the CXL 3.0 specification software must check the Command Effects
> Log (CEL) to know if a device supports DC.  If the device does support
> DC the specifics of the DC Regions (0-7) are read through the mailbox.
> 
> Flag DC Device (DCD) commands in a device if they are supported.
> Subsequent patches will key off these bits to configure a DCD.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Navneet Singh <navneet.singh@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Navneet Singh <navneet.singh@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> 

Trivial unrelated change seems to have sneaked in. Other than that
this looks good to me.

So with that tidied up.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Thanks,

Jonathan

> +
>  static bool cxl_is_security_command(u16 opcode)
>  {
>  	int i;
> @@ -677,9 +705,10 @@ static void cxl_walk_cel(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds, size_t size, u8 *cel)
>  		u16 opcode = le16_to_cpu(cel_entry[i].opcode);
>  		struct cxl_mem_command *cmd = cxl_mem_find_command(opcode);
>  
> -		if (!cmd && !cxl_is_poison_command(opcode)) {
> -			dev_dbg(dev,
> -				"Opcode 0x%04x unsupported by driver\n", opcode);
> +		if (!cmd && !cxl_is_poison_command(opcode) &&
> +		    !cxl_is_dcd_command(opcode)) {
> +			dev_dbg(dev, "Opcode 0x%04x unsupported by driver\n",
> +				opcode);

Clang format has been playing?
Better to leave this alone and save reviewers wondering what the change
in the dev_dbg() was.

>  			continue;
>  		}