All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@kernkonzept.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] OPP: Use _set_opp_level() for single genpd case
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 20:54:31 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231025152431.bhdv772dwbufocck@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZTkciw5AwufxQYnB@gerhold.net>

On 25-10-23, 15:47, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> FWIW I'm hitting this WARNing when trying to set up the parent domain
> setup for CPR->RPMPD(MX) on MSM8916 that I discussed with Uffe recently
> [1]. I know, me and all my weird OPP setups. :'D
> 
> Basically, I have cpufreq voting for performance states of the CPR genpd
> (via required-opps). CPR is supposed to have <&rpmpd MSM8916_VDDMX_AO>
> as parent genpd and translates to the parent performance state using the
> "required-opps" in the *CPR* OPP table:
> 
> 	cpr: power-controller@b018000 {
> 		compatible = "qcom,msm8916-cpr", "qcom,cpr";
> 		reg = <0x0b018000 0x1000>;
> 		/* ... */
> 		#power-domain-cells = <0>;
> 		operating-points-v2 = <&cpr_opp_table>;
> 		/* Supposed to be parent domain, not consumer */
> 		power-domains = <&rpmpd MSM8916_VDDMX_AO>;
> 
> 		cpr_opp_table: opp-table {
> 			compatible = "operating-points-v2-qcom-level";
> 
> 			cpr_opp1: opp1 {
> 				opp-level = <1>;
> 				qcom,opp-fuse-level = <1>;
> 				required-opps = <&rpmpd_opp_svs_soc>;
> 			};
> 			cpr_opp2: opp2 {
> 				opp-level = <2>;
> 				qcom,opp-fuse-level = <2>;
> 				required-opps = <&rpmpd_opp_nom>;
> 			};
> 			cpr_opp3: opp3 {
> 				opp-level = <3>;
> 				qcom,opp-fuse-level = <3>;
> 				required-opps = <&rpmpd_opp_super_turbo>;
> 			};
> 		};
> 	};

I have forgotten a bit about this usecase. How exactly does the
configurations work currently for this ? I mean genpd core must be
setting the vote finally for only one of them or something else ?

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-25 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-19 10:21 [RFT PATCH 0/2] OPP: Simplify required-opp handling Viresh Kumar
2023-10-19 10:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] OPP: Use _set_opp_level() for single genpd case Viresh Kumar
2023-10-19 11:16   ` Ulf Hansson
2023-10-20  3:45     ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-20 10:02       ` Ulf Hansson
2023-10-20 10:56         ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-20 11:09           ` Ulf Hansson
2023-10-25  6:54     ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-25 10:40       ` Ulf Hansson
2023-10-25 10:48         ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-25 13:47         ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-10-25 15:24           ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2023-10-25 16:16             ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-10-26  9:53           ` Ulf Hansson
2023-10-30 10:29             ` Viresh Kumar
2023-11-03 11:58               ` Ulf Hansson
2023-11-06  7:08                 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-11-10 13:50                   ` Ulf Hansson
2023-11-15  5:32                     ` Viresh Kumar
2023-11-16 10:44                       ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-19 10:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] OPP: Call dev_pm_opp_set_opp() for required OPPs Viresh Kumar
2023-10-24 11:18   ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-10-25  7:36     ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-25 12:17       ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-10-25 15:20         ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-25 16:03           ` Ulf Hansson
2023-10-26  7:44             ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-25 13:51   ` Ulf Hansson
2023-10-25 15:09     ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231025152431.bhdv772dwbufocck@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=stephan.gerhold@kernkonzept.com \
    --cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.