All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	 Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
	 Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
	 Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
	 Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>,
	 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
	 Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	 Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>,
	David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>,
	 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	 Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
	 Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
	 Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,  Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>,
	 Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>,
	 Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	 Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
	Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>,
	 Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	 Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	 Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	 Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev,
	 linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	 gfs2@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	 linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 39/41] smb/server: adapt to breakup of struct file_lock
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:43:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240125-flsplit-v2-39-7485322b62c7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240125-flsplit-v2-0-7485322b62c7@kernel.org>

Most of the existing APIs have remained the same, but subsystems that
access file_lock fields directly need to reach into struct
file_lock_core now.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
 fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 fs/smb/server/vfs.c     | 15 +++++++--------
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c b/fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c
index d12d11cdea29..1a1ce70c7b2d 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c
+++ b/fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
 #include <linux/ethtool.h>
 #include <linux/falloc.h>
 #include <linux/mount.h>
-#define _NEED_FILE_LOCK_FIELD_MACROS
 #include <linux/filelock.h>
 
 #include "glob.h"
@@ -6761,10 +6760,10 @@ struct file_lock *smb_flock_init(struct file *f)
 
 	locks_init_lock(fl);
 
-	fl->fl_owner = f;
-	fl->fl_pid = current->tgid;
-	fl->fl_file = f;
-	fl->fl_flags = FL_POSIX;
+	fl->fl_core.flc_owner = f;
+	fl->fl_core.flc_pid = current->tgid;
+	fl->fl_core.flc_file = f;
+	fl->fl_core.flc_flags = FL_POSIX;
 	fl->fl_ops = NULL;
 	fl->fl_lmops = NULL;
 
@@ -6781,30 +6780,30 @@ static int smb2_set_flock_flags(struct file_lock *flock, int flags)
 	case SMB2_LOCKFLAG_SHARED:
 		ksmbd_debug(SMB, "received shared request\n");
 		cmd = F_SETLKW;
-		flock->fl_type = F_RDLCK;
-		flock->fl_flags |= FL_SLEEP;
+		flock->fl_core.flc_type = F_RDLCK;
+		flock->fl_core.flc_flags |= FL_SLEEP;
 		break;
 	case SMB2_LOCKFLAG_EXCLUSIVE:
 		ksmbd_debug(SMB, "received exclusive request\n");
 		cmd = F_SETLKW;
-		flock->fl_type = F_WRLCK;
-		flock->fl_flags |= FL_SLEEP;
+		flock->fl_core.flc_type = F_WRLCK;
+		flock->fl_core.flc_flags |= FL_SLEEP;
 		break;
 	case SMB2_LOCKFLAG_SHARED | SMB2_LOCKFLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY:
 		ksmbd_debug(SMB,
 			    "received shared & fail immediately request\n");
 		cmd = F_SETLK;
-		flock->fl_type = F_RDLCK;
+		flock->fl_core.flc_type = F_RDLCK;
 		break;
 	case SMB2_LOCKFLAG_EXCLUSIVE | SMB2_LOCKFLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY:
 		ksmbd_debug(SMB,
 			    "received exclusive & fail immediately request\n");
 		cmd = F_SETLK;
-		flock->fl_type = F_WRLCK;
+		flock->fl_core.flc_type = F_WRLCK;
 		break;
 	case SMB2_LOCKFLAG_UNLOCK:
 		ksmbd_debug(SMB, "received unlock request\n");
-		flock->fl_type = F_UNLCK;
+		flock->fl_core.flc_type = F_UNLCK;
 		cmd = F_SETLK;
 		break;
 	}
@@ -6842,13 +6841,13 @@ static void smb2_remove_blocked_lock(void **argv)
 	struct file_lock *flock = (struct file_lock *)argv[0];
 
 	ksmbd_vfs_posix_lock_unblock(flock);
-	wake_up(&flock->fl_wait);
+	wake_up(&flock->fl_core.flc_wait);
 }
 
 static inline bool lock_defer_pending(struct file_lock *fl)
 {
 	/* check pending lock waiters */
-	return waitqueue_active(&fl->fl_wait);
+	return waitqueue_active(&fl->fl_core.flc_wait);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -6939,8 +6938,8 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 		list_for_each_entry(cmp_lock, &lock_list, llist) {
 			if (cmp_lock->fl->fl_start <= flock->fl_start &&
 			    cmp_lock->fl->fl_end >= flock->fl_end) {
-				if (cmp_lock->fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK &&
-				    flock->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {
+				if (cmp_lock->fl->fl_core.flc_type != F_UNLCK &&
+				    flock->fl_core.flc_type != F_UNLCK) {
 					pr_err("conflict two locks in one request\n");
 					err = -EINVAL;
 					locks_free_lock(flock);
@@ -6988,12 +6987,12 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 		list_for_each_entry(conn, &conn_list, conns_list) {
 			spin_lock(&conn->llist_lock);
 			list_for_each_entry_safe(cmp_lock, tmp2, &conn->lock_list, clist) {
-				if (file_inode(cmp_lock->fl->fl_file) !=
-				    file_inode(smb_lock->fl->fl_file))
+				if (file_inode(cmp_lock->fl->fl_core.flc_file) !=
+				    file_inode(smb_lock->fl->fl_core.flc_file))
 					continue;
 
-				if (smb_lock->fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK) {
-					if (cmp_lock->fl->fl_file == smb_lock->fl->fl_file &&
+				if (smb_lock->fl->fl_core.flc_type == F_UNLCK) {
+					if (cmp_lock->fl->fl_core.flc_file == smb_lock->fl->fl_core.flc_file &&
 					    cmp_lock->start == smb_lock->start &&
 					    cmp_lock->end == smb_lock->end &&
 					    !lock_defer_pending(cmp_lock->fl)) {
@@ -7010,7 +7009,7 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 					continue;
 				}
 
-				if (cmp_lock->fl->fl_file == smb_lock->fl->fl_file) {
+				if (cmp_lock->fl->fl_core.flc_file == smb_lock->fl->fl_core.flc_file) {
 					if (smb_lock->flags & SMB2_LOCKFLAG_SHARED)
 						continue;
 				} else {
@@ -7052,7 +7051,7 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 		}
 		up_read(&conn_list_lock);
 out_check_cl:
-		if (smb_lock->fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK && nolock) {
+		if (smb_lock->fl->fl_core.flc_type == F_UNLCK && nolock) {
 			pr_err("Try to unlock nolocked range\n");
 			rsp->hdr.Status = STATUS_RANGE_NOT_LOCKED;
 			goto out;
@@ -7176,7 +7175,7 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 		struct file_lock *rlock = NULL;
 
 		rlock = smb_flock_init(filp);
-		rlock->fl_type = F_UNLCK;
+		rlock->fl_core.flc_type = F_UNLCK;
 		rlock->fl_start = smb_lock->start;
 		rlock->fl_end = smb_lock->end;
 
diff --git a/fs/smb/server/vfs.c b/fs/smb/server/vfs.c
index d0686ec344f5..2b67cccea91c 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/vfs.c
+++ b/fs/smb/server/vfs.c
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
 
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
-#define _NEED_FILE_LOCK_FIELD_MACROS
 #include <linux/filelock.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/backing-dev.h>
@@ -338,18 +337,18 @@ static int check_lock_range(struct file *filp, loff_t start, loff_t end,
 		return 0;
 
 	spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
-	list_for_each_entry(flock, &ctx->flc_posix, fl_list) {
+	list_for_each_entry(flock, &ctx->flc_posix, fl_core.flc_list) {
 		/* check conflict locks */
 		if (flock->fl_end >= start && end >= flock->fl_start) {
-			if (flock->fl_type == F_RDLCK) {
+			if (flock->fl_core.flc_type == F_RDLCK) {
 				if (type == WRITE) {
 					pr_err("not allow write by shared lock\n");
 					error = 1;
 					goto out;
 				}
-			} else if (flock->fl_type == F_WRLCK) {
+			} else if (flock->fl_core.flc_type == F_WRLCK) {
 				/* check owner in lock */
-				if (flock->fl_file != filp) {
+				if (flock->fl_core.flc_file != filp) {
 					error = 1;
 					pr_err("not allow rw access by exclusive lock from other opens\n");
 					goto out;
@@ -1838,13 +1837,13 @@ int ksmbd_vfs_copy_file_ranges(struct ksmbd_work *work,
 
 void ksmbd_vfs_posix_lock_wait(struct file_lock *flock)
 {
-	wait_event(flock->fl_wait, !flock->fl_blocker);
+	wait_event(flock->fl_core.flc_wait, !flock->fl_core.flc_blocker);
 }
 
 int ksmbd_vfs_posix_lock_wait_timeout(struct file_lock *flock, long timeout)
 {
-	return wait_event_interruptible_timeout(flock->fl_wait,
-						!flock->fl_blocker,
+	return wait_event_interruptible_timeout(flock->fl_core.flc_wait,
+						!flock->fl_core.flc_blocker,
 						timeout);
 }
 

-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-25 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-25 10:42 [PATCH v2 00/41] filelock: split struct file_lock into file_lock and file_lease structs Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/41] filelock: rename some fields in tracepoints Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/41] filelock: rename fl_pid variable in lock_get_status Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/41] dlm: rename fl_flags variable in dlm_posix_unlock Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/41] nfs: rename fl_flags variable in nfs4_proc_unlck Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/41] nfsd: rename fl_type and fl_flags variables in nfsd4_lock Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/41] lockd: rename fl_flags and fl_type variables in nlmclnt_lock Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/41] 9p: rename fl_type variable in v9fs_file_do_lock Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/41] afs: rename fl_type variable in afs_next_locker Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/41] filelock: drop the IS_* macros Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/41] filelock: split common fields into struct file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/41] filelock: add coccinelle scripts to move fields to " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 12/41] filelock: have fs/locks.c deal with file_lock_core directly Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 13/41] filelock: convert some internal functions to use file_lock_core instead Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 14/41] filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 15/41] filelock: make posix_same_owner take file_lock_core pointers Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 16/41] filelock: convert posix_owner_key to take file_lock_core arg Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 17/41] filelock: make locks_{insert,delete}_global_locks " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 18/41] filelock: convert locks_{insert,delete}_global_blocked Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 19/41] filelock: make __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks take file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 20/41] filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 21/41] filelock: convert fl_blocker to file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 22/41] filelock: clean up locks_delete_block internals Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 23/41] filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 24/41] filelock: make assign_type helper take a file_lock_core pointer Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 25/41] filelock: convert locks_wake_up_blocks to " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 26/41] filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 27/41] filelock: convert locks_translate_pid to take file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 28/41] filelock: convert seqfile handling to use file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 29/41] 9p: adapt to breakup of struct file_lock Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 30/41] afs: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 31/41] ceph: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 32/41] dlm: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 33/41] gfs2: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 34/41] lockd: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 35/41] nfs: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 36/41] nfsd: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 37/41] ocfs2: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 38/41] smb/client: " Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 40/41] filelock: remove temporary compatability macros Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 41/41] filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/41] filelock: split struct file_lock into file_lock and file_lease structs Chuck Lever
2024-01-25 17:00   ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-25 22:34   ` NeilBrown
2024-01-25 23:58     ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240125-flsplit-v2-39-7485322b62c7@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=aahringo@redhat.com \
    --cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
    --cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=kolga@netapp.com \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pc@manguebit.com \
    --cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=sfrench@samba.org \
    --cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
    --cc=teigland@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.