[PATCH v3 2/8] m68k: Only force 030 bus error if PC not in exception table

From: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
To: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org
Cc: geert@linux-m68k.org, uli@fpond.eu, fthain@linux-m68k.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/8] m68k: Only force 030 bus error if PC not in exception table
Date: Wed,  7 Feb 2024 10:10:58 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240206211104.26421-3-schmitzmic@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240206211104.26421-1-schmitzmic@gmail.com>

commit 513138a14063760ef611f18ba76c5c7915ff8cdd upstream.

__get_kernel_nofault() does copy data in supervisor mode when
forcing a task backtrace log through /proc/sysrq_trigger.
This is expected cause a bus error exception on e.g. NULL
pointer dereferencing when logging a kernel task has no
workqueue associated. This bus error ought to be ignored.

Our 030 bus error handler is ill equipped to deal with this:

Whenever ssw indicates a kernel mode access on a data fault,
we don't even attempt to handle the fault and instead always
send a SEGV signal (or panic). As a result, the check
for exception handling at the fault PC (buried in
send_sig_fault() which gets called from do_page_fault()
eventually) is never used.

In contrast, both 040 and 060 access error handlers do not
care whether a fault happened on supervisor mode access,
and will call do_page_fault() on those, ultimately honoring
the exception table.

Add a check in bus_error030 to call do_page_fault() in case
we do have an entry for the fault PC in our exception table.

I had attempted a fix for this earlier in 2019 that did rely
on testing pagefault_disabled() (see link below) to achieve
the same thing, but this patch should be more generic.

Tested on 030 Atari Falcon.

Reported-by: Eero Tamminen <oak@helsinkinet.fi>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.LNX.2.21.1904091023540.25@nippy.intranet
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/63130691-1984-c423-c1f2-73bfd8d3dcd3@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301021107.26307-1-schmitzmic@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
---
 arch/m68k/kernel/traps.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/traps.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/traps.c
index 6c9ca24830e9..c547140b8325 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/traps.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/ptrace.h>
 #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
+#include <linux/extable.h>
 
 #include <asm/setup.h>
 #include <asm/fpu.h>
@@ -549,7 +550,8 @@ static inline void bus_error030 (struct frame *fp)
 			errorcode |= 2;
 
 		if (mmusr & (MMU_I | MMU_WP)) {
-			if (ssw & 4) {
+			/* We might have an exception table for this PC */
+			if (ssw & 4 && !search_exception_tables(fp->ptregs.pc)) {
 				pr_err("Data %s fault at %#010lx in %s (pc=%#lx)\n",
 				       ssw & RW ? "read" : "write",
 				       fp->un.fmtb.daddr,
-- 
2.17.1

