Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] spi: cadence-qspi: put runtime in runtime PM hooks names

From: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
To: "Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@ti.com>,
	<linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@mobileye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] spi: cadence-qspi: put runtime in runtime PM hooks names
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 14:03:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240207083333.jqghhzihzwz5yeeq@dhruva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240205-cdns-qspi-pm-fix-v2-1-2e7bbad49a46@bootlin.com>

On Feb 05, 2024 at 15:57:29 +0100, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Follow kernel naming convention with regards to power-management
> callback function names.
> 
> The convention in the kernel is:
>  - prefix_suspend means the system-wide suspend callback;
>  - prefix_runtime_suspend means the runtime PM suspend callback.
> The same applies to resume callbacks.
> 
> Fixes: 0578a6dbfe75 ("spi: spi-cadence-quadspi: add runtime pm support")

Not sure if it's a bug as such since there's no functional change other
than renaming.

> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> index 74647dfcb86c..720b28d2980c 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> @@ -1927,7 +1927,7 @@ static void cqspi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>  }
>  
> -static int cqspi_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +static int cqspi_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct cqspi_st *cqspi = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct spi_controller *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> @@ -1941,7 +1941,7 @@ static int cqspi_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int cqspi_resume(struct device *dev)
> +static int cqspi_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct cqspi_st *cqspi = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct spi_controller *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> @@ -1956,8 +1956,8 @@ static int cqspi_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	return spi_controller_resume(host);
>  }
>  
> -static DEFINE_RUNTIME_DEV_PM_OPS(cqspi_dev_pm_ops, cqspi_suspend,
> -				 cqspi_resume, NULL);
> +static DEFINE_RUNTIME_DEV_PM_OPS(cqspi_dev_pm_ops, cqspi_runtime_suspend,
> +				 cqspi_runtime_resume, NULL);
>  

No objections as such,
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>

-- 
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>