All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: track per-node I/O latency
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 10:55:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202404041045.bLSpHDFH-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240403141756.88233-2-hare@kernel.org>

Hi Hannes,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on axboe-block/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.9-rc2 next-20240403]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Hannes-Reinecke/block-track-per-node-I-O-latency/20240403-222254
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240403141756.88233-2-hare%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH 1/2] block: track per-node I/O latency
config: s390-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240404/202404041045.bLSpHDFH-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 546dc2245ffc4cccd0b05b58b7a5955e355a3b27)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240404/202404041045.bLSpHDFH-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404041045.bLSpHDFH-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from block/bdev.c:9:
   In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2208:
   include/linux/vmstat.h:522:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
     522 |         return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
         |                               ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
   In file included from block/bdev.c:15:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-integrity.h:5:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-mq.h:8:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     547 |         val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     560 |         val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
         |                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
      37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
         |                                                           ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
     102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
         |                                                      ^
   In file included from block/bdev.c:15:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-integrity.h:5:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-mq.h:8:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     573 |         val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
         |                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
      35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
         |                                                           ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
     115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
         |                                                      ^
   In file included from block/bdev.c:15:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-integrity.h:5:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-mq.h:8:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     584 |         __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     594 |         __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                                                       ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     604 |         __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                                                       ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     692 |         readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     700 |         readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     708 |         readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     717 |         writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                 ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     726 |         writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                 ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     735 |         writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                 ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   In file included from block/bdev.c:15:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-integrity.h:5:
>> include/linux/blk-mq.h:1242:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'blk_nlat_latency' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    1242 | u64 blk_nlat_latency(struct gendisk *disk, int node) { return 0; }
         |     ^
   include/linux/blk-mq.h:1242:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
    1242 | u64 blk_nlat_latency(struct gendisk *disk, int node) { return 0; }
         | ^
         | static 
   include/linux/blk-mq.h:1243:15: error: unknown type name 'in'
    1243 | static inline in blk_nlat_init(struct gendisk *disk) { return -ENOTSUPP; }
         |               ^
   14 warnings and 1 error generated.


vim +/blk_nlat_latency +1242 include/linux/blk-mq.h

  1233	
  1234	#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_NODE_LATENCY
  1235	int blk_nlat_enable(struct gendisk *disk);
  1236	void blk_nlat_disable(struct gendisk *disk);
  1237	u64 blk_nlat_latency(struct gendisk *disk, int node);
  1238	int blk_nlat_init(struct gendisk *disk);
  1239	#else
  1240	static inline int blk_nlat_enable(struct gendisk *disk) { return 0; }
  1241	static inline void blk_nlat_disable(struct gendisk *disk) {}
> 1242	u64 blk_nlat_latency(struct gendisk *disk, int node) { return 0; }

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-04  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-03 14:17 [PATCHv2 0/2] block,nvme: latency-based I/O scheduler Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-03 14:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: track per-node I/O latency Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-04  2:22   ` kernel test robot
2024-04-04  2:55   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-04-04 18:47   ` kernel test robot
2024-04-03 14:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: add 'latency' iopolicy Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-04 21:14 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] block,nvme: latency-based I/O scheduler Keith Busch
2024-04-05  6:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-05 15:03     ` Keith Busch
2024-04-05 15:36       ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-07 19:55         ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-05-09 20:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] " John Meneghini
2024-05-10  9:34   ` Niklas Cassel
2024-05-09 20:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] block: track per-node I/O latency John Meneghini
2024-05-10  7:11   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-05-10  9:28     ` Niklas Cassel
2024-05-10 10:00     ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-09 20:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] nvme: add 'latency' iopolicy John Meneghini
2024-05-10  7:17   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-05-10 10:03     ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-09 20:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] nvme: multipath: pr_notice when iopolicy changes John Meneghini
2024-05-10  7:19   ` Damien Le Moal
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-26 15:35 [PATCH RFC 0/2] block,nvme: latency-based I/O scheduler Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: track per-node I/O latency Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-27 18:03   ` kernel test robot
2024-03-27 20:59   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202404041045.bLSpHDFH-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hare@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.