All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
To: "djwong@kernel.org" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 23/26] xfs: Filter XFS_ATTR_PARENT for getfattr
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 21:49:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <278fb4cce1eb9b7eaec97f8d382a2c12a3cd05c4.camel@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yy4o9c9w5OilCkrS@magnolia>

On Fri, 2022-09-23 at 14:45 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 10:44:55PM -0700,
> allison.henderson@oracle.com wrote:
> > From: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
> > 
> > Parent pointers returned to the get_fattr tool cause errors since
> > the tool cannot parse parent pointers.  Fix this by filtering
> > parent
> > parent pointers from xfs_attr_list.
> 
> Yes!!  Parent pointers should /never/ be accessible by the standard
> VFS
> xattr syscalls, nor should the XFS ATTR_MULTI calls handle them.
> 
> Changes to parent pointers are performed via separate syscalls
> (link/unlink/mknod/creat/etc), and I see you've created a separate
> parent pointer ioctl later on for userspace to retrieve them.  I
> think
> this is the correct access model.
> 
> To check that assertion -- getxattr/setxattr/removexattr (and the
> ATTRMULTI
> equivalents) are prevented from accessing parent pointers directly
> because you'd have to be able to set XFS_ATTR_PARENT in
> xfs_da_args.attr_filter, right?
Well, you set XFS_IOC_ATTR_PARENT which later translates to
XFS_ATTR_PARENT.  I do that later in the set, but I see you've already
commented on it

> 
> And for the VFS to get/set/remove a parent pointer, XFS would have to
> provide a struct xattr_handler with ->flags = XFS_ATTR_PARENT, which
> XFS
> will never do, right?
Well, this set does not plan to make any vfs modifications at least :-)

> 
> And for ATTR_MULTI to touch a parent pointer, xfs_attr_filter (and
> the
> ioctl api) would have to learn about XFS_ATTR_PARENT, which XFS will
> also never do, right?
I think we do have to publish that XFS_ATTR_PARENT exists, but I don't
think we have to implement the XFS_IOC_ATTR_PARENT translation

> 
> If the answers to these three questions are all yes then you're 95%
> of
> the way to an RVB, except...
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_format.h |  3 +++
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c        | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > ----
> >  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_format.h
> > b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_format.h
> > index b02b67f1999e..e9c323fab6f3 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_format.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_format.h
> > @@ -697,6 +697,9 @@ struct xfs_attr3_leafblock {
> >  #define XFS_ATTR_INCOMPLETE    (1u << XFS_ATTR_INCOMPLETE_BIT)
> >  #define XFS_ATTR_NSP_ONDISK_MASK \
> >                         (XFS_ATTR_ROOT | XFS_ATTR_SECURE |
> > XFS_ATTR_PARENT)
> > +#define XFS_ATTR_ALL \
> > +       (XFS_ATTR_LOCAL_BIT | XFS_ATTR_ROOT | XFS_ATTR_SECURE | \
> > +        XFS_ATTR_PARENT | XFS_ATTR_INCOMPLETE_BIT)
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * Alignment for namelist and valuelist entries (since they are
> > mixed
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c
> > index a51f7f13a352..13de597c4996 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_list.c
> > @@ -39,6 +39,23 @@ xfs_attr_shortform_compare(const void *a, const
> > void *b)
> >         }
> >  }
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * Returns true or false if the parent attribute should be listed
> > + */
> > +static bool
> > +xfs_attr_filter_parent(
> > +       struct xfs_attr_list_context    *context,
> > +       int                             flags)
> > +{
> > +       if (!(flags & XFS_ATTR_PARENT))
> > +               return true;
> > +
> > +       if (context->attr_filter & XFS_ATTR_PARENT)
> > +               return true;
> > +
> > +       return false;
> 
> ...wouldn't it suffice to do:
> 
> static inline bool
> xfs_attr_filter_listent(
>         struct xfs_attr_list_context    *context,
>         int                             flags)
> {
>         return context->attr_filter != (flags &
> XFS_ATTR_NSP_ONDISK_MASK);
> }
Almost.... XFS_ATTR_NSP_ONDISK_MASK includes XFS_ATTR_PARENT, so here
we'd want XFS_ATTR_NSP_ONDISK_MASK & ~XFS_ATTR_PARENT

Also, XFS_ATTR_NSP_ONDISK_MASK doesnt include XFS_ATTR_LOCAL which was
previously allowable

Hmm, how bout just:
	return context->attr_filter != flags & (XFS_ATTR_ROOT |
XFS_ATTR_SECURE | XFS_ATTR_LOCAL)

I think that preserves the existing behavior

> 
> like how xfs_ioc_attr_put_listent does?  And then...
> 
> > +}
> > +
> >  #define XFS_ISRESET_CURSOR(cursor) \
> >         (!((cursor)->initted) && !((cursor)->hashval) && \
> >          !((cursor)->blkno) && !((cursor)->offset))
> > @@ -90,11 +107,12 @@ xfs_attr_shortform_list(
> >                                                                sfe-
> > >namelen,
> >                                                                sfe-
> > >flags)))
> >                                 return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> > -                       context->put_listent(context,
> > -                                            sfe->flags,
> > -                                            sfe->nameval,
> > -                                            (int)sfe->namelen,
> > -                                            (int)sfe->valuelen);
> > +                       if (xfs_attr_filter_parent(context, sfe-
> > >flags))
> > +                               context->put_listent(context,
> > +                                                    sfe->flags,
> > +                                                    sfe->nameval,
> > +                                                    (int)sfe-
> > >namelen,
> > +                                                    (int)sfe-
> > >valuelen);
> >                         /*
> >                          * Either search callback finished early or
> >                          * didn't fit it all in the buffer after
> > all.
> > @@ -185,11 +203,12 @@ xfs_attr_shortform_list(
> >                         error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> >                         goto out;
> >                 }
> > -               context->put_listent(context,
> > -                                    sbp->flags,
> > -                                    sbp->name,
> > -                                    sbp->namelen,
> > -                                    sbp->valuelen);
> > +               if (xfs_attr_filter_parent(context, sbp->flags))
> > +                       context->put_listent(context,
> > +                                            sbp->flags,
> > +                                            sbp->name,
> > +                                            sbp->namelen,
> > +                                            sbp->valuelen);
> >                 if (context->seen_enough)
> >                         break;
> >                 cursor->offset++;
> > @@ -474,8 +493,10 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_list_int(
> >                                    !xfs_attr_namecheck(mp, name,
> > namelen,
> >                                                        entry-
> > >flags)))
> >                         return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> > -               context->put_listent(context, entry->flags,
> > +               if (xfs_attr_filter_parent(context, entry->flags))
> > +                       context->put_listent(context, entry->flags,
> >                                               name, namelen,
> > valuelen);
> > +
> >                 if (context->seen_enough)
> >                         break;
> >                 cursor->offset++;
> > @@ -539,6 +560,10 @@ xfs_attr_list(
> >         if (xfs_is_shutdown(dp->i_mount))
> >                 return -EIO;
> >  
> > +       if (context->attr_filter == 0)
> > +               context->attr_filter =
> > +                       XFS_ATTR_ALL & ~XFS_ATTR_PARENT;
> 
> ...I think this is unnecessary since none of the callers can actually
> set XFS_ATTR_PARENT in the first place, right?
> 
The caller can stuff any bit in there they want, but until now it
didn't matter because context->attr_filter was unused (getfattr appears
to just leave it as 0).  So the existing behavior was that requesting
nothing resulted in everything.  Now we're flipping that (at least
internally).

If we use the filter logic above, this would need to turn into
context->attr_filter = (XFS_ATTR_ROOT | XFS_ATTR_SECURE |
XFS_ATTR_LOCAL)

> --D
> 
> > +
> >         lock_mode = xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared(dp);
> >         error = xfs_attr_list_ilocked(context);
> >         xfs_iunlock(dp, lock_mode);
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-26 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-22  5:44 [PATCH v3 00/26] Parent Pointers allison.henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 01/26] xfs: Add new name to attri/d allison.henderson
2022-09-23 18:53   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-23 20:43     ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 02/26] xfs: Increase XFS_DEFER_OPS_NR_INODES to 5 allison.henderson
2022-09-23 19:02   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-23 20:45     ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 03/26] xfs: Hold inode locks in xfs_ialloc allison.henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 04/26] xfs: Hold inode locks in xfs_trans_alloc_dir allison.henderson
2022-09-23 19:04   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-23 20:44     ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 05/26] xfs: Hold inode locks in xfs_rename allison.henderson
2022-09-23 19:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-23 20:44     ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 06/26] xfs: Expose init_xattrs in xfs_create_tmpfile allison.henderson
2022-09-23 19:25   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-23 20:45     ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-23 21:18       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 07/26] xfs: get directory offset when adding directory name allison.henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 08/26] xfs: get directory offset when removing " allison.henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 09/26] xfs: get directory offset when replacing a " allison.henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 10/26] xfs: add parent pointer support to attribute code allison.henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 11/26] xfs: define parent pointer xattr format allison.henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 12/26] xfs: Add xfs_verify_pptr allison.henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 13/26] xfs: extend transaction reservations for parent attributes allison.henderson
2022-09-23 20:17   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-23 23:53     ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-26 23:53       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-27 20:04         ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-27 20:44           ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 14/26] xfs: parent pointer attribute creation allison.henderson
2022-09-23 21:11   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-26 21:48     ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-26 23:54       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-27 20:10         ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 15/26] xfs: add parent attributes to link allison.henderson
2022-09-23 20:31   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-26 21:49     ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-26 23:55       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 16/26] xfs: add parent attributes to symlink allison.henderson
2022-09-23 21:16   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-26 21:48     ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 17/26] xfs: remove parent pointers in unlink allison.henderson
2022-09-23 21:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-26 21:49     ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 18/26] xfs: Add parent pointers to xfs_cross_rename allison.henderson
2022-09-23 21:52   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-26 21:50     ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 19/26] xfs: Indent xfs_rename allison.henderson
2022-09-23 21:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-26 21:49     ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 20/26] xfs: Add parent pointers to rename allison.henderson
2022-09-23 22:08   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-26 21:50     ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 21/26] xfs: Add the parent pointer support to the superblock version 5 allison.henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 22/26] xfs: Add helper function xfs_attr_list_context_init allison.henderson
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 23/26] xfs: Filter XFS_ATTR_PARENT for getfattr allison.henderson
2022-09-22 16:55   ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-23 21:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-26 21:49     ` Allison Henderson [this message]
2022-09-27 18:32       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-28 18:22         ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-28  1:13   ` [xfs] b73248c4ee: xfstests.xfs.269.fail kernel test robot
2022-09-28  1:13     ` kernel test robot
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 24/26] xfs: Add parent pointer ioctl allison.henderson
2022-09-22 14:02   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-24  0:30   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-26 21:50     ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-27 18:34       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 25/26] xfs: fix unit conversion error in xfs_log_calc_max_attrsetm_res allison.henderson
2022-09-23 21:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-26 21:50     ` Allison Henderson
2022-09-27  0:02       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-22  5:44 ` [PATCH v3 26/26] xfs: drop compatibility minimum log size computations for reflink allison.henderson
2022-09-23 21:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-26 21:50     ` Allison Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=278fb4cce1eb9b7eaec97f8d382a2c12a3cd05c4.camel@oracle.com \
    --to=allison.henderson@oracle.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.