All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"Christoph Lameter" <cl@linux.com>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lai Jiangshan" <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	"Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@kernel.org>,
	"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	"Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@mellanox.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: document zone device struct page field usage
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 21:39:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2807E5FD2F6FDA4886F6618EAC48510E79E2E610@CRSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80dbf7fc-5c13-f43f-7b87-8273126562e9@nvidia.com>

> 
> On 7/22/19 4:08 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 10:13:45PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 09:02:04AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:29:53PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> >>>> Struct page for ZONE_DEVICE private pages uses the page->mapping
> >>>> and and page->index fields while the source anonymous pages are
> >>>> migrated to device private memory. This is so rmap_walk() can find
> >>>> the page when migrating the ZONE_DEVICE private page back to system
> memory.
> >>>> ZONE_DEVICE pmem backed fsdax pages also use the page->mapping
> and
> >>>> page->index fields when files are mapped into a process address space.
> >>>>
> >>>> Restructure struct page and add comments to make this more clear.
> >>>
> >>> NAK.  I just got rid of this kind of foolishness from struct page,
> >>> and you're making it harder to understand, not easier.  The comments
> >>> could be improved, but don't lay it out like this again.
> >>
> >> Was V1 of Ralphs patch ok?  It seemed ok to me.
> >
> > Yes, v1 was fine.  This seems like a regression.
> >
> 
> This is about what people find "easiest to understand" and so I'm not
> surprised that opinions differ.
> What if I post a v3 based on v1 but remove the _zd_pad_* variables that
> Christoph found misleading and add some more comments about how the
> different ZONE_DEVICE types use the 3 remaining words (basically the
> comment from v2)?

I'm ok with that...

Ira


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-23 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-19 19:29 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm/hmm: fixes for device private page migration Ralph Campbell
2019-07-19 19:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: document zone device struct page field usage Ralph Campbell
2019-07-19 21:43   ` John Hubbard
2019-07-21 15:05   ` Randy Dunlap
2019-07-21 16:02   ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-07-22  5:13     ` Ira Weiny
2019-07-22 11:08       ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-07-23 21:25         ` Ralph Campbell
2019-07-23 21:39           ` Weiny, Ira [this message]
2019-07-22  9:36     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-22  9:37   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-19 19:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/hmm: fix ZONE_DEVICE anon page mapping reuse Ralph Campbell
2019-07-19 21:45   ` John Hubbard
2019-07-22  9:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-19 19:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/hmm: Fix bad subpage pointer in try_to_unmap_one Ralph Campbell
2019-07-20 12:23   ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2807E5FD2F6FDA4886F6618EAC48510E79E2E610@CRSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.