All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] ACPI: processor: Export function to claim _CST control
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 10:31:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2985992.BQKmCqvNrW@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2037014.bnAicLLH9b@kreacher>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The intel_idle driver will be modified to use ACPI _CST subsequently
and it will need to notify the platform firmware of that if
acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control is set, so add a routine for this purpose,
acpi_processor_claim_cst_control(), to acpi_processor.c (so that it
is always present which is required by intel_idle) and export it
to allow the ACPI processor driver (which is modular) to call it.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |   25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |   12 ++++--------
 include/linux/acpi.h          |    6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -705,3 +705,28 @@ void __init acpi_processor_init(void)
 	acpi_scan_add_handler_with_hotplug(&processor_handler, "processor");
 	acpi_scan_add_handler(&processor_container_handler);
 }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE
+/**
+ * acpi_processor_claim_cst_control - Request _CST control from the platform.
+ */
+bool acpi_processor_claim_cst_control(void)
+{
+	static bool cst_control_claimed;
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	if (!acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control || cst_control_claimed)
+		return true;
+
+	status = acpi_os_write_port(acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command,
+				    acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control, 8);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+		pr_warn("ACPI: Failed to claim processor _CST control\n");
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	cst_control_claimed = true;
+	return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_processor_claim_cst_control);
+#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE */
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -909,7 +909,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_setup_cstates(
 
 static inline void acpi_processor_cstate_first_run_checks(void)
 {
-	acpi_status status;
 	static int first_run;
 
 	if (first_run)
@@ -921,13 +920,10 @@ static inline void acpi_processor_cstate
 			  max_cstate);
 	first_run++;
 
-	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control && !nocst) {
-		status = acpi_os_write_port(acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command,
-					    acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control, 8);
-		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
-			ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status,
-					"Notifying BIOS of _CST ability failed"));
-	}
+	if (nocst)
+		return;
+
+	acpi_processor_claim_cst_control();
 }
 #else
 
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/acpi.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -279,6 +279,12 @@ static inline bool invalid_phys_cpuid(ph
 
 /* Validate the processor object's proc_id */
 bool acpi_duplicate_processor_id(int proc_id);
+/* Processor _CTS control */
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE
+bool acpi_processor_claim_cst_control(void);
+#else
+static inline bool acpi_processor_claim_cst_control(void) { return false; }
+#endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
 /* Arch dependent functions for cpu hotplug support */




  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-06  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-06  9:28 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] cpuidle: intel_idle: Use ACPI _CTS to get idle states information Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-06  9:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-12-06  9:32 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] ACPI: processor: Introduce acpi_processor_evaluate_cst() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-06  9:36 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] ACPI: processor: Clean up acpi_processor_evaluate_cst() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-06  9:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] ACPI: processor: Export acpi_processor_evaluate_cst() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-08 13:55   ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-06  9:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] intel_idle: Refactor intel_idle_cpuidle_driver_init() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-06  9:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] intel_idle: Use ACPI _CST for processor models without C-state tables Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2985992.BQKmCqvNrW@kreacher \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.