All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: update s_overhead_clusters in the superblock during an on-line resize
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 14:47:43 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2F240021-C24A-4F86-ACDA-2FF944F9FE6F@dilger.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220629040026.112371-1-tytso@mit.edu>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1640 bytes --]

On Jun 28, 2022, at 10:00 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> When doing an online resize, the on-disk superblock on-disk wasn't
> updated.  This means that when the file system is unmounted and
> remounted, and the on-disk overhead value is non-zero, this would
> result in the results of statfs(2) to be incorrect.
> 
> This was partially fixed by Commits 10b01ee92df5 ("ext4: fix overhead
> calculation to account for the reserved gdt blocks"), 85d825dbf489
> ("ext4: force overhead calculation if the s_overhead_cluster makes no
> sense"), and eb7054212eac ("ext4: update the cached overhead value in
> the superblock").

Would these be better referenced by Fixes: labels?

> However, since it was too expensive to forcibly recalculate the
> overhead for bigalloc file systems at every mount, this didn't fix the
> problem for bigalloc file systems.  This commit should address the
> problem when resizing file systems with the bigalloc feature enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org

Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>

> ---
> fs/ext4/resize.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c
> index 8b70a4701293..e5c2713aa11a 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
> @@ -1484,6 +1484,7 @@ static void ext4_update_super(struct super_block *sb,
> 	 * Update the fs overhead information
> 	 */
> 	ext4_calculate_overhead(sb);
> +	es->s_overhead_clusters = cpu_to_le32(sbi->s_overhead);
> 
> 	if (test_opt(sb, DEBUG))
> 		printk(KERN_DEBUG "EXT4-fs: added group %u:"
> --
> 2.31.0
> 


Cheers, Andreas






[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 873 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-04 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-29  4:00 [PATCH 1/2] ext4: update s_overhead_clusters in the superblock during an on-line resize Theodore Ts'o
2022-06-29  4:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: update the s_overhead_clusters in the backup sb's when resizing Theodore Ts'o
2022-07-04 20:50   ` Andreas Dilger
2022-07-07 14:35     ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-07-04 20:47 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2022-07-07 14:32   ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: update s_overhead_clusters in the superblock during an on-line resize Theodore Ts'o
2022-07-08  3:19 ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2F240021-C24A-4F86-ACDA-2FF944F9FE6F@dilger.ca \
    --to=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.