All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Berg <benjamin@sipsolutions.net>
To: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc: maxime@cerno.tech, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sadiya Kazi <sadiyakazi@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] kunit: Always run cleanup from a test kthread
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 09:34:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a5a079404f9ed3082d09a78f270db54a36d93ba.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230419085426.1671703-1-davidgow@google.com>

Hi David,

On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 16:54 +0800, David Gow wrote:
> KUnit tests run in a kthread, with the current->kunit_test pointer set
> to the test's context. This allows the kunit_get_current_test() and
> kunit_fail_current_test() macros to work. Normally, this pointer is
> still valid during test shutdown (i.e., the suite->exit function, and
> any resource cleanup). However, if the test has exited early (e.g., due
> to a failed assertion), the cleanup is done in the parent KUnit thread,
> which does not have an active context.
> 
> Instead, in the event test terminates early, run the test exit and
> cleanup from a new 'cleanup' kthread, which sets current->kunit_test,
> and better isolates the rest of KUnit from issues which arise in test
> cleanup.
> 
> If a test cleanup function itself aborts (e.g., due to an assertion
> failing), there will be no further attempts to clean up: an error will
> be logged and the test failed.
> 
> This should also make it easier to get access to the KUnit context,
> particularly from within resource cleanup functions, which may, for
> example, need access to data in test->priv.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> ---
> This is an updated version of / replacement of "kunit: Set the current
> KUnit context when cleaning up", which instead creates a new kthread
> for cleanup tasks if the original test kthread is aborted. This protects
> us from failed assertions during cleanup, if the test exited early.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230415091401.681395-1-davidgow@google.com/
> - Move cleanup execution to another kthread
>   - (Thanks, Benjamin, for pointing out the assertion issues)

Nice, I think this is looking promising. After thinking about it a bit,
maybe one thing to improve is to always start the new cleanup kthread
from kunit_run_case_catch_errors.

That way there is only one codepath. But, more importantly, it means if
the cleanup fails the first time, we do not risk running it a second
time and we get slightly nicer error reporting. Not that this happening
would be a big issue.

Benjamin


> ---
>  lib/kunit/test.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
> index e2910b261112..caeae0dfd82b 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
> @@ -423,8 +423,51 @@ static void kunit_try_run_case(void *data)
>         kunit_run_case_cleanup(test, suite);
>  }
>  
> +static void kunit_try_run_case_cleanup(void *data)
> +{
> +       struct kunit_try_catch_context *ctx = data;
> +       struct kunit *test = ctx->test;
> +       struct kunit_suite *suite = ctx->suite;
> +
> +       current->kunit_test = test;
> +
> +       kunit_run_case_cleanup(test, suite);
> +}
> +
> +static void kunit_catch_run_case_cleanup(void *data)
> +{
> +       struct kunit_try_catch_context *ctx = data;
> +       struct kunit *test = ctx->test;
> +       int try_exit_code = kunit_try_catch_get_result(&test->try_catch);
> +
> +       /* It is always a failure if cleanup aborts. */
> +       kunit_set_failure(test);
> +
> +       if (try_exit_code) {
> +               /*
> +                * Test case could not finish, we have no idea what state it is
> +                * in, so don't do clean up.
> +                */
> +               if (try_exit_code == -ETIMEDOUT) {
> +                       kunit_err(test, "test case cleanup timed out\n");
> +               /*
> +                * Unknown internal error occurred preventing test case from
> +                * running, so there is nothing to clean up.
> +                */
> +               } else {
> +                       kunit_err(test, "internal error occurred during test case cleanup: %d\n",
> +                                 try_exit_code);
> +               }
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       kunit_err(test, "test aborted during cleanup. continuing without cleaning up\n");
> +}
> +
> +
>  static void kunit_catch_run_case(void *data)
>  {
> +       struct kunit_try_catch cleanup;
>         struct kunit_try_catch_context *ctx = data;
>         struct kunit *test = ctx->test;
>         struct kunit_suite *suite = ctx->suite;
> @@ -451,9 +494,16 @@ static void kunit_catch_run_case(void *data)
>  
>         /*
>          * Test case was run, but aborted. It is the test case's business as to
> -        * whether it failed or not, we just need to clean up.
> +        * whether it failed or not, we just need to clean up. Do this in a new
> +        * try / catch context, in case it asserts, too.
>          */
> -       kunit_run_case_cleanup(test, suite);
> +       kunit_try_catch_init(&cleanup,
> +                            test,
> +                            kunit_try_run_case_cleanup,
> +                            kunit_catch_run_case_cleanup);
> +       ctx->test = test;
> +       ctx->suite = suite;
> +       kunit_try_catch_run(&cleanup, ctx);
>  }
>  
>  /*


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-20  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-19  8:54 [PATCH v2 1/3] kunit: Always run cleanup from a test kthread David Gow
2023-04-19  8:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Documentation: kunit: Note that assertions should not be used in cleanup David Gow
2023-04-19  8:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Documentation: kunit: Warn that exit functions run even if init fails David Gow
2023-04-20  7:34 ` Benjamin Berg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2a5a079404f9ed3082d09a78f270db54a36d93ba.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=benjamin@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=sadiyakazi@google.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.