All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915/dp: Fix duplication of DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ handling
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:01:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2af9869d50ac18d4542fbd2fe240314c852f1a88.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180924224528.4744-6-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>

On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 15:45 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> There are two copies of the same code called from long and short
> pulse handlers.


Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 59 ++++++++++++-------------------
> --
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index d6ea93e453a2..64c6158feb0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4038,13 +4038,6 @@ intel_dp_configure_mst(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
>  					intel_dp->is_mst);
>  }
>  
> -static bool
> -intel_dp_get_sink_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8
> *sink_irq_vector)
> -{
> -	return drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
> DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR,
> -				 sink_irq_vector) == 1;
> -}
> -
>  static bool
>  intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8
> *sink_irq_vector)
>  {
> @@ -4432,6 +4425,26 @@ static bool intel_dp_hotplug(struct
> intel_encoder *encoder,
>  	return changed;
>  }
>  
> +static void intel_dp_check_service_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> +	u8 val;
> +
> +	if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < 0x11)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
> +			      DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR, &val) != 1
> || !val)
> +		return;
> +
> +	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
> DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR, val);
> +
> +	if (val & DP_AUTOMATED_TEST_REQUEST)
> +		intel_dp_handle_test_request(intel_dp);
> +
> +	if (val & (DP_CP_IRQ | DP_SINK_SPECIFIC_IRQ))
> +		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CP or sink specific irq
> unhandled\n");
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * According to DP spec
>   * 5.1.2:
> @@ -4449,7 +4462,6 @@ static bool
>  intel_dp_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> -	u8 sink_irq_vector = 0;
>  	u8 old_sink_count = intel_dp->sink_count;
>  	bool ret;
>  
> @@ -4472,20 +4484,7 @@ intel_dp_short_pulse(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp)
>  		return false;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Try to read the source of the interrupt */
> -	if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= 0x11 &&
> -	    intel_dp_get_sink_irq(intel_dp, &sink_irq_vector) &&
> -	    sink_irq_vector != 0) {
> -		/* Clear interrupt source */
> -		drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
> -				   DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR,
> -				   sink_irq_vector);
> -
> -		if (sink_irq_vector & DP_AUTOMATED_TEST_REQUEST)
> -			intel_dp_handle_test_request(intel_dp);
> -		if (sink_irq_vector & (DP_CP_IRQ |
> DP_SINK_SPECIFIC_IRQ))
> -			DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CP or sink specific irq
> unhandled\n");
> -	}
> +	intel_dp_check_service_irq(intel_dp);
>  
>  	/* Handle CEC interrupts, if any */
>  	drm_dp_cec_irq(&intel_dp->aux);
> @@ -5020,7 +5019,6 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector
> *connector,
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
>  	struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)-
> >base;
>  	int status;
> -	u8 sink_irq_vector = 0;
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
>  		      connector->base.id, connector->name);
> @@ -5103,20 +5101,7 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector
> *connector,
>  	    to_intel_connector(connector)->detect_edid)
>  		status = connector_status_connected;
>  
> -	/* Try to read the source of the interrupt */
> -	if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= 0x11 &&
> -	    intel_dp_get_sink_irq(intel_dp, &sink_irq_vector) &&
> -	    sink_irq_vector != 0) {
> -		/* Clear interrupt source */
> -		drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
> -				   DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR,
> -				   sink_irq_vector);
> -
> -		if (sink_irq_vector & DP_AUTOMATED_TEST_REQUEST)
> -			intel_dp_handle_test_request(intel_dp);
> -		if (sink_irq_vector & (DP_CP_IRQ |
> DP_SINK_SPECIFIC_IRQ))
> -			DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CP or sink specific irq
> unhandled\n");
> -	}
> +	intel_dp_check_service_irq(intel_dp);
>  
>  out:
>  	if (status != connector_status_connected && !intel_dp->is_mst)
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-25 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-24 22:45 [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915/dp: Fix link retraining comment in intel_dp_long_pulse() Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-09-24 22:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915/dp: Restrict link retrain workaround to external monitors Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-10-01 19:49   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-01 22:00     ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-10-02  0:30     ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-10-23 11:56       ` Jani Nikula
2018-10-24 10:49         ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-10-01 22:30   ` Lyude Paul
2018-09-24 22:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915/dp: Use a local variable for intel_encoder * Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-09-25 20:51   ` Souza, Jose
2018-09-24 22:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/dp: Do not grab crtc modeset lock in intel_dp_detect() Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-09-25 20:58   ` Souza, Jose
2018-09-26  2:54   ` [PATCH v3 " Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-10-01 19:48     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-01 20:10       ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-01 22:01         ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-10-01 23:22           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-09-24 22:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/dp: Kill intel_dp->detect_done flag Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-09-25 17:53   ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-09-26  2:31     ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-09-24 22:45 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915/dp: Fix duplication of DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ handling Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-09-25 21:01   ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2018-09-24 23:47 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v2,1/6] drm/i915/dp: Fix link retraining comment in intel_dp_long_pulse() Patchwork
2018-09-25  0:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2018-09-25  6:33 ` Patchwork
2018-09-26  2:08 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] drm/i915/dp: Do not grab crtc modeset lock in intel_dp_detect() Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-09-26  3:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v2,1/6] drm/i915/dp: Fix link retraining comment in intel_dp_long_pulse() (rev2) Patchwork
2018-09-26  3:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-09-26  4:32 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-10-01 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915/dp: Fix link retraining comment in intel_dp_long_pulse() Lyude Paul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2af9869d50ac18d4542fbd2fe240314c852f1a88.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.