All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>, Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
	Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 11/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor shadow_zero_check out of make_spte
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:06:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c924ef5-2ff9-c9a8-f28c-8bedaf8b1af6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YYxvSfUPTXbclpSa@google.com>

On 11/11/21 02:18, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> But what would you actually move?  Even shadow_zero_check barely squeaks by,
> e.g. if NX is ever used to for NPT, then maybe it stops being a per-VM setting.

Hmm, I think it would still be per-VM, just like 32-bit shadow page tables
are always built for EFER.NXE=CR4.PAE=1.  Anyway, the rough sketch is to have
three structs:

* struct kvm_mmu_kind has the function pointers and the state that is
needed to operate on page tables

* struct kvm_mmu has the function pointers and the state that is
needed while the vCPU runs, including the role

* struct kvm_paging_context has the stuff related to emulation;
shadow page tables of course needs it but EPT/NPT do not (with
either the old or the new MMU)

So you'd have a "struct kvm_mmu_kind direct_mmu" in struct kvm_arch (for
either legacy EPT/NPT or the new MMU), and

	struct kvm_mmu_kind shadow_mmu;
	struct kvm_mmu root_mmu;		/* either TDP or shadow */
	struct kvm_mmu tdp12_mmu;		/* always shadow */
	struct kvm_mmu *mmu;			/* either &kvm->direct_mmu or &vcpu->shadow_mmu */
	struct kvm_paging_context root_walk;	/* maybe unified with walk01 below? dunno yet */
	struct kvm_paging_context walk01;
	struct kvm_paging_context walk12;
	struct kvm_paging_context *walk;	/* either &vcpu->root_walk or &vcpu->walk12 */

in struct kvm_vcpu_arch.  struct kvm_mmu* has a pointer to
struct kvm_mmu_kind*; however, if an spte.c function does not need
the data in struct kvm_mmu_state*, it can take a struct kvm_mmu_kind*
and it won't need a vCPU.  Likewise the TDP MMU knows its kvm_mmu_kind
is always in &kvm->direct_mmu so it can take a struct kvm* if the struct
kvm_mmu_state* is not needed.

The first part of the refactoring would be to kill the nested_mmu
and walk_mmu, replacing them by &vcpu->walk12 and vcpu->walk
respectively.  The half-useless nested_mmu has always bothered me,
I was going to play with it anyway because I want to remove the
kvm_mmu_reset_context from CR0.WP writes, I'll see if I get
something useful out of it.

Paolo


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-11  7:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-10 22:29 [RFC 00/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize disabling dirty logging Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 01/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix TLB flush range when handling disconnected pt Ben Gardon
2021-11-11 17:44   ` David Matlack
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 02/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Batch TLB flushes for a single zap Ben Gardon
2021-11-11 18:06   ` David Matlack
2021-11-12 23:53   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 03/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor flush and free up when zapping under MMU write lock Ben Gardon
2021-11-11 18:31   ` David Matlack
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 04/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Yield while processing disconnected_sps Ben Gardon
2021-11-11 18:50   ` David Matlack
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 05/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove redundant flushes when disabling dirty logging Ben Gardon
2021-11-11 18:55   ` David Matlack
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 06/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Introduce vcpu_make_spte Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 07/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor wrprot for nested PML out of make_spte Ben Gardon
2021-11-18  2:12   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-18 17:43     ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-18 18:04       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-10 22:29 ` [RFC 08/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor mt_mask " Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 09/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove need for a vcpu from kvm_slot_page_track_is_active Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 10/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove need for a vcpu from mmu_try_to_unsync_pages Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 11/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor shadow_zero_check out of make_spte Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:44   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-10 23:49     ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-11  1:18       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-11  1:44         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-11  7:06         ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-11-18  2:05   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-18  3:29     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-18 16:37       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-18 17:19         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-18 18:02           ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-18 18:07             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-18 18:14               ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 12/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace vcpu argument with kvm pointer in make_spte Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 13/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out the meat of reset_tdp_shadow_zero_bits_mask Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 14/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Propagate memslot const qualifier Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 15/19] KVM: x86/MMU: Refactor vmx_get_mt_mask Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 16/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out part of vmx_get_mt_mask which does not depend on vcpu Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 17/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Add try_get_mt_mask to x86_ops Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 18/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Make kvm_is_mmio_pfn usable outside of spte.c Ben Gardon
2021-11-10 22:30 ` [RFC 19/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Promote pages in-place when disabling dirty logging Ben Gardon
2021-11-15 21:24 ` [RFC 00/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize " Ben Gardon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2c924ef5-2ff9-c9a8-f28c-8bedaf8b1af6@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
    --cc=yulei.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.