All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] expose host-phys-bits to guest
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 08:10:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34be4132-53f4-8779-1ada-68aa554e0eac@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220901161741.dadmguwv25sk4h6i@sirius.home.kraxel.org>

On 9/2/2022 12:17 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 10:36:19PM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>> On 9/1/2022 9:58 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>
>>>> Anyway, IMO, guest including guest firmware, should always consult from
>>>> CPUID leaf 0x80000008 for physical address length.
>>>
>>> It simply can't for the reason outlined above.  Even if we fix qemu
>>> today that doesn't solve the problem for the firmware because we want
>>> backward compatibility with older qemu versions.  Thats why I want the
>>> extra bit which essentially says "CPUID leaf 0x80000008 actually works".
>>
>> I don't understand how it backward compatible with older qemu version. Old
>> QEMU won't set the extra bit you introduced in this series, and all the
>> guest created with old QEMU will become untrusted on CPUID leaf 0x80000008 ?
> 
> Correct, on old qemu firmware will not trust CPUID leaf 0x80000008.
> That is not worse than the situation we have today, currently the
> firmware never trusts CPUID leaf 0x80000008.
> 
> So the patches will improves the situation for new qemu only, but I
> don't see a way around that.
> 

I see.

But IMHO, I don't think it's good that guest firmware workaround the 
issue on its own. Instead, it's better to just trust CPUID leaf 
0x80000008 and fail if the given physical address length cannot be 
virtualized/supported.

It's just the bug of VMM to virtualize the physical address length. The 
correction direction is to fix the bug not the workaround to hide the bug.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-02  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-31 12:50 [PATCH 0/2] expose host-phys-bits to guest Gerd Hoffmann
2022-08-31 12:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] [hack] reserve bit KVM_HINTS_HOST_PHYS_BITS Gerd Hoffmann
2022-08-31 13:05   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-31 12:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] [RfC] expose host-phys-bits to guest Gerd Hoffmann
2022-08-31 12:58   ` Claudio Fontana
2022-09-01  6:07 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Xiaoyao Li
2022-09-01 13:58   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-09-01 14:36     ` Xiaoyao Li
2022-09-01 16:17       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-09-02  0:10         ` Xiaoyao Li [this message]
2022-09-02  6:07           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-09-02  6:35             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-09-02  8:44               ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-09-04 20:37                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-09-05  7:39                   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-09-01 14:55   ` Claudio Fontana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=34be4132-53f4-8779-1ada-68aa554e0eac@intel.com \
    --to=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=slp@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.