From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] KVM: x86: generalize guest_cpuid_has_ helpers
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 17:40:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3924d878-c8f1-06f7-1051-19864708211e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170802204147.3586-2-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
On 02/08/2017 22:41, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> This patch turns guest_cpuid_has_XYZ(cpuid) into guest_cpuid_has(cpuid,
> X86_FEATURE_XYZ), which gets rid of many very similar helpers.
>
> When seeing a X86_FEATURE_*, we can know which cpuid it belongs to, but
> this information isn't in common code, so we recreate it for KVM.
>
> Add some BUILD_BUG_ONs to make sure that it runs nicely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h | 202 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 7 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/mtrr.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 26 +++----
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 38 +++++-----
> 6 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 172 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> index da6728383052..3b17d915b608 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>
> #include "x86.h"
> #include <asm/cpu.h>
> +#include <asm/processor.h>
>
> int kvm_update_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> bool kvm_mpx_supported(void);
> @@ -29,95 +30,78 @@ static inline int cpuid_maxphyaddr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return vcpu->arch.maxphyaddr;
> }
>
> -static inline bool guest_cpuid_has_xsave(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +struct cpuid_reg {
> + u32 function;
> + u32 index;
> + int reg;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct cpuid_reg reverse_cpuid[] = {
> + [CPUID_1_EDX] = { 1, 0, CPUID_EDX},
> + [CPUID_8000_0001_EDX] = {0x80000001, 0, CPUID_EDX},
> + [CPUID_8086_0001_EDX] = {0x80860001, 0, CPUID_EDX},
> + [CPUID_1_ECX] = { 1, 0, CPUID_ECX},
> + [CPUID_C000_0001_EDX] = {0xc0000001, 0, CPUID_EDX},
> + [CPUID_8000_0001_ECX] = {0xc0000001, 0, CPUID_ECX},
> + [CPUID_7_0_EBX] = { 7, 0, CPUID_EBX},
> + [CPUID_D_1_EAX] = { 0xd, 1, CPUID_EAX},
> + [CPUID_F_0_EDX] = { 0xf, 0, CPUID_EDX},
> + [CPUID_F_1_EDX] = { 0xf, 1, CPUID_EDX},
> + [CPUID_8000_0008_EBX] = {0x80000008, 0, CPUID_EBX},
> + [CPUID_6_EAX] = { 6, 0, CPUID_EAX},
> + [CPUID_8000_000A_EDX] = {0x8000000a, 0, CPUID_EDX},
> + [CPUID_7_ECX] = { 7, 0, CPUID_ECX},
> + [CPUID_8000_0007_EBX] = {0x80000007, 0, CPUID_EBX},
> +};
> +
> +static inline struct cpuid_reg x86_feature_cpuid(unsigned x86_feature)
> +{
> + unsigned x86_leaf = x86_feature / 32;
> +
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(x86_leaf));
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(x86_leaf >= ARRAY_SIZE(reverse_cpuid));
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(reverse_cpuid[x86_leaf].function == 0);
> +
> + return reverse_cpuid[x86_leaf];
> +}
> +
> +static inline int *guest_cpuid_get_register(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned x86_feature)
> {
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
> + struct cpuid_reg cpuid = x86_feature_cpuid(x86_feature);
>
> - if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVE))
> + best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, cpuid.function, cpuid.index);
> + if (!best)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + switch (cpuid.reg) {
> + case CPUID_EAX:
> + return &best->eax;
> + case CPUID_EBX:
> + return &best->ebx;
> + case CPUID_ECX:
> + return &best->ecx;
> + case CPUID_EDX:
> + return &best->edx;
> + default:
> + BUILD_BUG();
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +}
Wow, I didn't expect the compiler to be able to inline all of this and
even do BUILD_BUG_ON()s on array lookups. Maybe change inline to
__always_inline just to be safe?
If anybody complains we can make it just a BUG.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-04 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-02 20:41 [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: x86: generalize guest cpuid helpers Radim Krčmář
2017-08-02 20:41 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] KVM: x86: generalize guest_cpuid_has_ helpers Radim Krčmář
2017-08-04 15:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-04 20:44 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-08-04 15:40 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-08-04 20:48 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-08-02 20:41 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] KVM: x86: use general helpers for some cpuid manipulation Radim Krčmář
2017-08-03 11:53 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: x86: generalize guest cpuid helpers David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3924d878-c8f1-06f7-1051-19864708211e@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.