All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, rad@semihalf.com,
	peter.maydell@linaro.org, quic_llindhol@quicinc.com,
	eduardo@habkost.net, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com,
	philmd@linaro.org, wangyanan55@huawei.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	alistair.francis@wdc.com, bin.meng@windriver.com,
	thuth@redhat.com, lvivier@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	ajones@ventanamicro.com, berrange@redhat.com,
	dbarboza@ventanamicro.com, yihyu@redhat.com,
	shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] NUMA: Apply cluster-NUMA-node boundary for aarch64 and riscv machines
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:07:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d1d2e5d-0202-ffa8-e07f-1cd7dc2ea3bf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230327152651.41f22ac0@imammedo.users.ipa.redhat.com>

Hi Peter,

On 3/27/23 9:26 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 14:25:39 +0800
> Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> For arm64 and riscv architecture, the driver (/base/arch_topology.c) is
>> used to populate the CPU topology in the Linux guest. It's required that
>> the CPUs in one cluster can't span mutiple NUMA nodes. Otherwise, the Linux
>> scheduling domain can't be sorted out, as the following warning message
>> indicates. To avoid the unexpected confusion, this series attempts to
>> warn about such kind of irregular configurations.
>>
>>     -smp 6,maxcpus=6,sockets=2,clusters=1,cores=3,threads=1 \
>>     -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1,memdev=ram0                \
>>     -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=2-3,memdev=ram1                \
>>     -numa node,nodeid=2,cpus=4-5,memdev=ram2                \
>>
>>     ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>     WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/sched/topology.c:2271 build_sched_domains+0x284/0x910
>>     Modules linked in:
>>     CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.14.0-268.el9.aarch64 #1
>>     pstate: 00400005 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>>     pc : build_sched_domains+0x284/0x910
>>     lr : build_sched_domains+0x184/0x910
>>     sp : ffff80000804bd50
>>     x29: ffff80000804bd50 x28: 0000000000000002 x27: 0000000000000000
>>     x26: ffff800009cf9a80 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff800009cbf840
>>     x23: ffff000080325000 x22: ffff0000005df800 x21: ffff80000a4ce508
>>     x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffff000080324440 x18: 0000000000000014
>>     x17: 00000000388925c0 x16: 000000005386a066 x15: 000000009c10cc2e
>>     x14: 00000000000001c0 x13: 0000000000000001 x12: ffff00007fffb1a0
>>     x11: ffff00007fffb180 x10: ffff80000a4ce508 x9 : 0000000000000041
>>     x8 : ffff80000a4ce500 x7 : ffff80000a4cf920 x6 : 0000000000000001
>>     x5 : 0000000000000001 x4 : 0000000000000007 x3 : 0000000000000002
>>     x2 : 0000000000001000 x1 : ffff80000a4cf928 x0 : 0000000000000001
>>     Call trace:
>>      build_sched_domains+0x284/0x910
>>      sched_init_domains+0xac/0xe0
>>      sched_init_smp+0x48/0xc8
>>      kernel_init_freeable+0x140/0x1ac
>>      kernel_init+0x28/0x140
>>      ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>>
>> PATCH[1] Warn about the irregular configuration if required
>> PATCH[2] Enable the validation for aarch64 machines
>> PATCH[3] Enable the validation for riscv machines
>>
>> v3: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-arm/2023-02/msg01226.html
>> v2: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-arm/2023-02/msg01080.html
>> v1: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-arm/2023-02/msg00886.html
>>
>> Changelog
>> =========
>> v4:
>>    * Pick r-b and ack-b from Daniel/Philippe                   (Gavin)
>>    * Replace local variable @len with possible_cpus->len in
>>      validate_cpu_cluster_to_numa_boundary()                   (Philippe)
>> v3:
>>    * Validate cluster-to-NUMA instead of socket-to-NUMA
>>      boundary                                                  (Gavin)
>>    * Move the switch from MachineState to MachineClass         (Philippe)
>>    * Warning instead of rejecting the irregular configuration  (Daniel)
>>    * Comments to mention cluster-to-NUMA is platform instead
>>      of architectural choice                                   (Drew)
>>    * Drop PATCH[v2 1/4] related to qtests/numa-test            (Gavin)
>> v2:
>>    * Fix socket-NUMA-node boundary issues in qtests/numa-test  (Gavin)
>>    * Add helper set_numa_socket_boundary() and validate the
>>      boundary in the generic path                              (Philippe)
>>
>> Gavin Shan (3):
>>    numa: Validate cluster and NUMA node boundary if required
>>    hw/arm: Validate cluster and NUMA node boundary
>>    hw/riscv: Validate cluster and NUMA node boundary
>>
>>   hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c   |  2 ++
>>   hw/arm/virt.c       |  2 ++
>>   hw/core/machine.c   | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   hw/riscv/spike.c    |  2 ++
>>   hw/riscv/virt.c     |  2 ++
>>   include/hw/boards.h |  1 +
>>   6 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
>>
> 
> Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> 

Not sure if QEMU v8.0 is still available to integrate this series.
Otherwise, it should be something for QEMU v8.1. By the way, I'm
also uncertain who needs to be merge this series.

Thanks,
Gavin



  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-17  6:25 [PATCH v4 0/3] NUMA: Apply cluster-NUMA-node boundary for aarch64 and riscv machines Gavin Shan
2023-03-17  6:25 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] numa: Validate cluster and NUMA node boundary if required Gavin Shan
2023-03-21 11:39   ` Alistair Francis
2023-03-17  6:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] hw/arm: Validate cluster and NUMA node boundary Gavin Shan
2023-03-17  6:25 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] hw/riscv: " Gavin Shan
2023-03-21 11:40   ` Alistair Francis
2023-03-27 13:26 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] NUMA: Apply cluster-NUMA-node boundary for aarch64 and riscv machines Igor Mammedov
2023-04-12  1:07   ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2023-04-12 11:42     ` Peter Maydell
2023-04-13  5:50       ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-13 11:21         ` Igor Mammedov
2023-04-18  8:57           ` Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3d1d2e5d-0202-ffa8-e07f-1cd7dc2ea3bf@redhat.com \
    --to=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=bin.meng@windriver.com \
    --cc=dbarboza@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quic_llindhol@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rad@semihalf.com \
    --cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    --cc=yihyu@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.