All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Enable PSR1 on gen-9+ HW
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 23:49:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40357b496a3b7353db6078e950c943e639381217.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180907050609.GE20927@intel.com>

On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 22:06 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 04:52:02PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > We have new tests and fixes in place since the feature was last
> > disabled.
> > 
> > Try again for gen-9+ hardware and enable only PSR1 as a first step.
> > 
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > References: commit 2ee7dc497e34 ("drm/i915: disable PSR by default
> > on HSW/BDW")
> > References: commit dcb2e993f3c0 ("Revert "drm/i915: Enable PSR by
> > default on Valleyview and Cherryview."")
> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > index b6838b525502..fc823f93a4dc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -71,6 +71,10 @@ static bool psr_global_enabled(u32 debug)
> >  static bool intel_psr2_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  			       const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state)
> >  {
> > +	/* Disable PSR2 by default for all platforms */
> > +	if (i915_modparams.enable_psr == -1)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> >  	switch (dev_priv->psr.debug & I915_PSR_DEBUG_MODE_MASK) {
> >  	case I915_PSR_DEBUG_FORCE_PSR1:
> >  		return false;
> > @@ -1051,7 +1055,7 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv,
> >   * intel_psr_init - Init basic PSR work and mutex.
> >   * @dev_priv: i915 device private
> >   *
> > - * This function is  called only once at driver load to initialize
> > basic
> > + * This function is called only once at driver load to initialize
> > basic
> >   * PSR stuff.
> >   */
> >  void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > @@ -1065,19 +1069,14 @@ void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv)
> >  	if (!dev_priv->psr.sink_support)
> >  		return;
> >  
> > -	if (i915_modparams.enable_psr == -1) {
> > -		i915_modparams.enable_psr = dev_priv-
> > >vbt.psr.enable;
> > -
> > -		/* Per platform default: all disabled. */
> > -		i915_modparams.enable_psr = 0;
> > -	}
> > +	if (i915_modparams.enable_psr == -1)
> > +		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 9 || !dev_priv-
> > >vbt.psr.enable)
> > +			i915_modparams.enable_psr = 0;
> >  
> > -	/* Set link_standby x link_off defaults */
> >  	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv))
> >  		/* HSW and BDW require workarounds that we don't
> > implement. */
> >  		dev_priv->psr.link_standby = false;
> >  	else
> > -		/* For new platforms let's respect VBT back again
> > */
> 
> bikeshed: Can we please leave the clean-up for a separated patch?
> In case we need to revert we don't loose the clean-up part! :$
> 
Okay.

> Also a bikeshed of bikeshed: I think we need to revisit this block
> entirely
> anyways. I can't remember why we stopped respecting the bspec here.
> And probably this was only masking some issues that got fixed during
> your great journey! ;)
> 
> Maybe this block even explain the current gap on hsw and bdw?! ;)
The gap is I haven't had time to investigate :)

> 
> >  		dev_priv->psr.link_standby = dev_priv-
> > >vbt.psr.full_link;
> >  
> >  	INIT_WORK(&dev_priv->psr.work, intel_psr_work);
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-07  6:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-06 23:52 [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Enable PSR1 on gen-9+ HW Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-09-07  0:13 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2018-09-07  0:31 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-09-07  1:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-09-07  5:06 ` [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
2018-09-07  6:49   ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]
2018-09-11 14:04   ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-09-18  0:39     ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40357b496a3b7353db6078e950c943e639381217.camel@intel.com \
    --to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.