All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>
To: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] xen/evtchn: read producer index only once
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 11:50:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42e15cc4-56d1-b34b-d97e-d579e771788a@xen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0ca217c-ecc9-55f7-abb1-30a687a46b31@suse.com>



On 08/02/2021 10:59, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 08.02.21 11:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Yes, but I don't see an urgent need to fix that, as there would
> be thousands of accesses in the kernel needing a fix. A compiler
> tearing a naturally aligned access into multiple memory accesses
> would be rejected as buggy from the kernel community IMO.

I would not be so sure. From lwn [1]:

"In the Linux kernel, tearing of plain C-language loads has been 
observed even given properly aligned and machine-word-sized loads.)"

And for store tearing:

"Note that this tearing can happen even on properly aligned and 
machine-word-sized accesses, and in this particular case, even for 
volatile stores. Some might argue that this behavior constitutes a bug 
in the compiler, but either way it illustrates the perceived value of 
store tearing from a compiler-writer viewpoint. [...] But for properly 
aligned machine-sized stores, WRITE_ONCE() will prevent store tearing."

Cheers,

[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/793253/#Load%20Tearing

> 
> 
> Juergen

-- 
Julien Grall

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-08 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-06 10:49 [PATCH 0/7] xen/events: bug fixes and some diagnostic aids Juergen Gross
2021-02-06 10:49 ` [PATCH 1/7] xen/events: reset affinity of 2-level event initially Juergen Gross
2021-02-06 11:20   ` Julien Grall
2021-02-06 12:09     ` Jürgen Groß
2021-02-06 12:19       ` Julien Grall
2021-02-06 10:49 ` [PATCH 2/7] xen/events: don't unmask an event channel when an eoi is pending Juergen Gross
2021-02-08 10:06   ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-08 10:21     ` Jürgen Groß
2021-02-08 10:15   ` Ross Lagerwall
2021-02-06 10:49 ` [PATCH 3/7] xen/events: fix lateeoi irq acknowledgment Juergen Gross
2021-02-06 10:49 ` [PATCH 4/7] xen/events: link interdomain events to associated xenbus device Juergen Gross
2021-02-08 23:26   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-02-09 13:55   ` Wei Liu
2021-02-06 10:49 ` [PATCH 5/7] xen/events: add per-xenbus device event statistics and settings Juergen Gross
2021-02-08 23:35   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2021-02-06 10:49 ` [PATCH 6/7] xen/evtch: use smp barriers for user event ring Juergen Gross
2021-02-08  9:38   ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-08  9:41     ` Jürgen Groß
2021-02-08  9:44   ` Andrew Cooper
2021-02-08  9:50     ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-08 10:23       ` Andrew Cooper
2021-02-08 10:25         ` Jürgen Groß
2021-02-08 10:31           ` Andrew Cooper
2021-02-08 10:36         ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-08 10:45           ` Andrew Cooper
2021-02-06 10:49 ` [PATCH 7/7] xen/evtchn: read producer index only once Juergen Gross
2021-02-08  9:48   ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-08 10:41     ` Jürgen Groß
2021-02-08 10:51       ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-08 10:59         ` Jürgen Groß
2021-02-08 11:50           ` Julien Grall [this message]
2021-02-08 11:54           ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-08 12:15             ` Jürgen Groß
2021-02-08 12:23               ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-08 12:26                 ` Jürgen Groß
2021-02-08 11:40   ` Julien Grall
2021-02-08 11:48     ` Jürgen Groß
2021-02-08 12:03       ` Julien Grall
2021-02-06 18:46 ` [PATCH 0/7] xen/events: bug fixes and some diagnostic aids Julien Grall
2021-02-07 12:58   ` Jürgen Groß
2021-02-08  9:11     ` Julien Grall
2021-02-08  9:41       ` Jürgen Groß
2021-02-08  9:54         ` Julien Grall
2021-02-08 10:22           ` Jürgen Groß
2021-02-08 10:40             ` Julien Grall
2021-02-08 12:14               ` Jürgen Groß
2021-02-08 12:16                 ` Julien Grall
2021-02-08 12:31                   ` Jürgen Groß
2021-02-08 13:09                     ` Julien Grall
2021-02-08 13:58                       ` Jürgen Groß
2021-02-08 14:20                         ` Julien Grall
2021-02-08 14:35                           ` Julien Grall
2021-02-08 14:50                           ` Jürgen Groß

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42e15cc4-56d1-b34b-d97e-d579e771788a@xen.org \
    --to=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.